{"id":3671,"date":"2026-09-16T11:17:08","date_gmt":"2026-09-16T08:17:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-303\/"},"modified":"2026-09-25T21:15:37","modified_gmt":"2026-09-25T18:15:37","slug":"aisi-303","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-303\/","title":{"rendered":"AISI 303 \/ (1.4305)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- dm-hap --><\/p>\n<h1 class=\"dm-ust-baslik\" style=\"font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif !important;text-transform:none !important;font-size:27px;line-height:1.3;font-weight:800;color:#12303f;margin:0 0 10px;letter-spacing:-.01em;\">AISI 303 \/ (1.4305) \/ UNS S30300 \/ AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638<\/h1>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:0 0 22px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"background:#12303f;padding:14px 16px 12px;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:22px;font-weight:700;color:#fff;line-height:1.25;\">AISI 303<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-family:ui-monospace,Menlo,Consolas,monospace;font-size:12.5px;color:#b9cfdb;line-height:1.5;margin-top:5px;word-wrap:break-word;\">UNS S30300 \u00b7 W.Nr. 1.4305 \u00b7 X8CrNiS18-9 \u00b7 BS 303S31 \/ EN 58M \u00b7 17.0-19.0% Cr \u2013 8.0-10.0% Ni \u2013 S 0.15% min (ASTM A582) or 0.15-0.35% (EN 1.4305) \u2013 C \u2264 0.15% (ASTM A582) or \u2264 0.10% (EN 1.4305) \u2013 Mo \u2264 0.60% (optional) \u2013 balance Fe. It is a sulphur-bearing FREE-MACHINING austenitic stainless steel: NOT PRECIPITATION HARDENABLE, it cannot be hardened by heat treatment; strength is raised only by COLD WORK. Its selenium sister grade 303Se is UNS S30323 and is a SEPARATE material.<\/p>\n<div data-dmkars-blok=\"1\" style=\"border-top:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,.16);margin-top:13px;padding-top:11px;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:10px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#7f9fb0;font-weight:700;margin-bottom:8px;\">Not to be confused with<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/25\/aisi-303-aisi-304-difference\/\" data-dmkars=\"1\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:4px 11px;border:1px solid rgba(36,190,229,.45);background:rgba(36,190,229,.12);border-radius:99px;margin:0 6px 6px 0;font-size:12.5px;font-weight:600;color:#9fe2f7;text-decoration:none;\">AISI 304<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\n<div style=\"flex:0 0 118px;padding:11px 14px;background:#F7FAFB;font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b8091;font-weight:600;line-height:1.5;\">For what<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex:1 1 230px;min-width:0;padding:11px 14px;font-size:14.5px;line-height:1.7;color:#3d5260;word-wrap:break-word;overflow-wrap:break-word;\">Bought for high-volume machining on automatic screw machines: bushings, shafts, couplings, fittings, valve and fastener parts whose cost is set by machining time and whose environment is dry or mildly corrosive. The selection criterion is machinability, not corrosion resistance;<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\n<div style=\"flex:0 0 118px;padding:11px 14px;background:#F7FAFB;font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b8091;font-weight:600;line-height:1.5;\">Forms<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex:1 1 230px;min-width:0;padding:11px 14px;font-size:14.5px;line-height:1.7;color:#3d5260;word-wrap:break-word;overflow-wrap:break-word;\">Round bar \u00b7 flat bar \u00b7 plate \u00b7 sheet \u00b7 pipe and tube \u00b7 forging. All forms supplied to order. WARNING: the specification base of 303 is BAR and FORGING STOCK (ASTM A582, A484, A314). ISSF\/worldstainless and AZoM state that 303 is not produced in flat-rolled products and that its mechanical properties are specified for long products (bar) in ASTM A582; no current ASTM product specification for 303 in plate, sheet or pipe could be confirmed by four sources.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\n<div style=\"flex:0 0 118px;padding:11px 14px;background:#F7FAFB;font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b8091;font-weight:600;line-height:1.5;\">Standards<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex:1 1 230px;min-width:0;padding:11px 14px;font-size:14.5px;line-height:1.7;color:#3d5260;word-wrap:break-word;overflow-wrap:break-word;\"><b style=\"font-size:16.5px;font-weight:800;color:#12303f;\">AMS 5640<\/b> (bars, wire, mechanical tubing and forgings; Type 1 = S30300 sulphur 303, Type 2 = S30323 selenium 303Se) \u00b7 <b style=\"font-size:16.5px;font-weight:800;color:#12303f;\">AMS 5738<\/b> (303Se, Condition B high tensile). ASTM: A582 \/ A582M (Free-Machining Stainless Steel Bars \u2014 the PRIMARY specification for 303, Condition A) \u00b7 A484 (general requirements for bars, billets and forgings) \u00b7 A314 (billets and bars for forging) \u00b7 A320 Gr B8F (bolting). EN: 10088-3 (1.4305).<br \/><span style=\"font-size:12.5px;color:#7b8f9b;line-height:1.6;display:inline-block;margin-top:6px;\">1) 303 IS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF ASTM A276. The scope text of A276\/A276M states in Note 2 that free-machining stainless bars belong to A582\/A582M; the A276 grade tables published by Ferrobend and Boltport likewise contain neither S30300 nor S30323.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\n<div style=\"flex:0 0 118px;padding:11px 14px;background:#F7FAFB;font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b8091;font-weight:600;line-height:1.5;\">Advantage<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex:1 1 230px;min-width:0;padding:11px 14px;font-size:14.5px;line-height:1.7;color:#3d5260;word-wrap:break-word;overflow-wrap:break-word;\">Machinability. AZoM calls 303 &#8216;the optimum in machinability among the austenitic stainless steels&#8217; and gives the rating as about 78% of the free-machining reference steel B1212; MW Alloys gives the same quantity as 85% against the 1215 reference.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\n<div style=\"flex:0 0 118px;padding:11px 14px;background:#F7FAFB;font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b8091;font-weight:600;line-height:1.5;\">Welding<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex:1 1 230px;min-width:0;padding:11px 14px;font-size:14.5px;line-height:1.7;color:#3d5260;word-wrap:break-word;overflow-wrap:break-word;\">IT IS NOT WELDED \u2014 this is the defining limit of the grade. Sandmeyer says it is &#8216;not recommended for applications requiring welding&#8217;; ISSF\/worldstainless and AZoM say &#8216;not generally recommended&#8217;; thyssenkrupp says &#8216;the sulphur addition results in poor weldability&#8217;;<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\n<div style=\"flex:0 0 118px;padding:11px 14px;background:#fdeceb;font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#c0392b;font-weight:600;line-height:1.5;\">Limits<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex:1 1 230px;min-width:0;padding:11px 14px;font-size:14.5px;line-height:1.7;color:#3d5260;word-wrap:break-word;overflow-wrap:break-word;background:#fdeceb;\">1) IT IS NOT WELDED (five sources above). If a welded structure is required, 304\/316 is chosen rather than 303; even on single parts, if there is a weld bead the grade should be struck from the specification. 2) CORROSION RESISTANCE IS LOWER THAN 304.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:14px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/contact\/\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:11px 20px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;text-decoration:none;margin:0 8px 6px 0;background:#dd3333;color:#ffffff;\">REQUEST A QUOTE<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/stainless-steel\/\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:11px 20px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;text-decoration:none;margin:0 8px 6px 0;font-weight:600;border:1px solid #12303f;color:#12303f;\">All stainless steels &rarr;<\/a><span data-dm=\"dm-teknik\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:11px 20px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;text-decoration:none;margin:0 8px 6px 0;border:1px solid #dd3333;color:#dd3333;\">TECHNICAL DETAILS &darr;<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:9px 14px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-size:11.5px;color:#8a9aa4;line-height:1.5;\">Compiled from manufacturer data sheets \u00b7 confirm against the current specification before ordering<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- \/dm-hap --><!-- dm-nav --><\/p>\n<style>h4[id^=\"dm-b\"]{scroll-margin-top:120px}#dm-teknik{scroll-margin-top:120px}<\/style>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:0 0 22px;padding:12px 14px;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b8091;font-weight:600;margin-bottom:9px;\">On this page &middot; click to jump<\/div>\n<div><span data-dm=\"dm-b0\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">What AISI 303 Is<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b1\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Standards by Product Form<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b2\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">ASME and Pressure Code Status<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b3\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Product Forms With NO Standard<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b4\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Chemical Composition<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b5\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Mechanical Properties<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b6\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Physical Properties<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b7\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Heat Treatment and Thermal Stability<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b8\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Welding<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b9\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Machining<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b10\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Corrosion<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b11\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Honest Comparison<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b12\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><script>(function(){function go(id){var e=document.getElementById(id);if(e){var s=document.scrollingElement||document.documentElement;var y=e.getBoundingClientRect().top+s.scrollTop-118;if(y-0-0-0-0!==y){y=0;}window.scrollTo(0,y);}}function bind(el){el.addEventListener(\"click\",function(ev){ev.preventDefault();go(el.getAttribute(\"data-dm\"));});}function init(){var l=document.querySelectorAll(\"[data-dm]\");Array.prototype.forEach.call(l,bind);if(location.hash){if(location.hash.indexOf(\"#dm-\")===0){try{history.replaceState(null,\"\",location.pathname+location.search);}catch(e){}window.scrollTo(0,0);setTimeout(function(){window.scrollTo(0,0);},80);}}}if(document.readyState===\"loading\"){document.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",init);}else{init();}})();<\/script><!-- \/dm-nav --><br \/>\n<span id=\"dm-teknik\" style=\"display:block;height:0;overflow:hidden;\"><\/span><br \/>\n<strong>Corrosion resistance:<\/strong> The corrosion resistance of AISI 303 is slightly lower than that of 304 stainless. Grades 304 or 316 should be specified for harsher conditions. Grade 303 should not be exposed to marine or similar environments. Like other common austenitic stainless steels, grade 303 is subject to chloride stress corrosion cracking in environments above approximately 60 \u00b0C.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Temperature capability:<\/strong> 303 has good oxidation resistance in environments reaching 760 \u00b0C intermittently and 870 \u00b0C continuously. Carbide precipitation occurs in the 425-860 \u00b0C temperature range, however.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Weldability:<\/strong> Weldability is poor, so welding is generally not recommended. If it has to be carried out, the use of 308L or 309 electrodes is recommended. The material must be annealed after welding for maximum corrosion resistance.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Machinability:<\/strong> This is the grade with the best machinability among the austenitics. Its machinability rating is around 78% and it is known as the free-cutting stainless steel. Although the sulphur (S) addition raises machinability, it lowers corrosion resistance (lower than that of 304) and weakens formability; it is particularly unsuitable for sharp bends.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Heat treatment:<\/strong> Unlike the martensitic stainless steels, AISI 303 does not present a risk of hardening and embrittlement when heat treated. The steel generally does not require heat treatment, because the sulphur it contains already gives it good machinability and it does not display martensitic behaviour. In some cases, however, heat treatment can be applied to 303 in order to obtain greater hardness and strength. Solution treatment: 1010-1120 \u00b0C (1850-2050 \u00b0F). Ageing: this steel is generally not aged, but where necessary ageing can be carried out in the 500-700 \u00b0C (930-1300 \u00b0F) range. Stress relieving: 250-370 \u00b0C (480-700 \u00b0F).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Applications:<\/strong> 303 (1.4305) is frequently used in the manufacture of bolts, stainless screws and stainless nuts, in mass-produced stainless steel shafts, in the food sector, in mass-produced stainless shafting, in automotive gears and fasteners, in electronic units and in certain special decorative products \u2014 in short, wherever stainless steel and volume production are required together.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Chemical Composition<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Max. 0.15<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Mn<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Max. 2.00<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Si<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Max. 1.00<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">P<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Max. 0.20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">S<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Min. 0.15<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Cr<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Min. 17.0 \u00b7 Max. 19.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Ni<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Min. 8.0 \u00b7 Max. 10.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Mechanical Properties<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Density (kg\/m3)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">8027<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Elastic Modulus (GPa)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">193<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Mean Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (\u03bcm\/m\/\u00b0C)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">17.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Thermal Conductivity (W\/m.K)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">17.8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">0-538\u00b0C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">18.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">at 100\u00b0C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">16.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">at 500\u00b0C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">21.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Specific Heat 0-100\u00b0C (J\/kg.K)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Electirical Resistivity (N\u03a9.M)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">720<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Brinell (Hb)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">262 max<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"dm-std\" style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Standards and Equivalents \u00b7 AISI 303<\/div>\n<div data-dmtw=\"1\" style=\"position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;overflow-x:auto;\">\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Trade name<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">AISI 303<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">UNS<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">S30300<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">W.Nr (DIN\/EN)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">1.4305<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">AMS<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">5635 \u00b7 5638<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">ASTM<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">A484 \u00b7 A582<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Available forms<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Round bar \u00b7 Flat bar \u00b7 Plate \u00b7 Sheet \u00b7 Tube \u00b7 Forgings<br \/><span style=\"font-size:13px;color:#6b7a84;\">All forms are supplied to order.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- dm-zengin --><\/p>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b0\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">What AISI 303 Is \u2014 Machinability Bought With Sulphur, and What It Costs<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\">AISI 303 (UNS <b>S30300<\/b> \/ W.Nr. <b>1.4305<\/b> \/ EN name <b>X8CrNiS18-9<\/b>) is the <b>free-machining derivative<\/b> of the 18-8 austenitic family. The base chemistry follows the same logic as 304 \u2014 nominally <b>17\u201319 % Cr<\/b> and <b>8\u201310 % Ni<\/b> \u2014 but one deliberate addition changes everything: <b>sulphur is imposed by ASTM as a 0.15 % MINIMUM<\/b>. This is not an impurity; it is <b>a design decision written into the specification<\/b>. It creates thousands of <b>manganese sulphide (MnS) inclusions<\/b> inside the steel; those inclusions break the chip, act as a lubricant at the tool\u2013chip interface and cut the cutting force.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>And exactly the same inclusions are thousands of ready-made pit nuclei underneath the passive film.<\/b> The whole story of 303 fits in one sentence: <b>it is a manufacturing alloy, not a corrosion alloy.<\/b> Selling 303 as &#8220;the easier-machining version of 304&#8221; is a dishonest one-order win; the buyer learns the truth either during fabrication (it cannot be welded) or in the first year of service (pitting).<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Honest Positioning in Three Sentences<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>What you gain<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Machinability.<\/b> Published machinability tables put 303 in the <b>69\u201378 %<\/b> band and 304 in the <b>40\u201345 %<\/b> band (free-cutting carbon steel reference = 100 %). The absolute figure varies by publisher; <b>what is reliable is the ratio: 303 machines roughly 1.7\u20131.8 times faster<\/b>, with far longer tool life. On a high-volume turned part that is a real and large difference in cost per piece<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>What you lose \u00b7 1<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Corrosion resistance.<\/b> The sulphide inclusions are <b>pit initiation sites<\/b>. In the producer&#8217;s own wording, the resistance of 303 is &#8220;significantly less than Grade 304 due to the sulphur addition; the sulphide inclusions act as pit initiation sites.&#8221; <b>It is not recommended for marine or similar environments<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>What you lose \u00b7 2<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Weldability.<\/b> High sulphur and phosphorus produce <b>hot cracking<\/b>. The Australian welding standard AS 1554.6 <b>does not pre-qualify welding of 303<\/b>; producer datasheets say &#8220;not generally recommended&#8221;. One European mill answers the intergranular-corrosion-resistance question for both the <b>as-delivered<\/b> and the <b>as-welded<\/b> condition with a single word each: <b>NO \/ NO<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>What you lose \u00b7 3<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Formability.<\/b> 303 is <b>not readily cold workable<\/b>. The inclusions act as <b>crack nuclei<\/b> in bending and cold heading. For deep drawing, dishing, cold heading or tight-radius bending, 303 is the wrong material<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>What you lose \u00b7 4<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>An extra penalty in the transverse direction.<\/b> Sulphide inclusions are strung out along the rolling direction. That is why <b>corrosion resistance is particularly reduced in cross-sections<\/b>, and why transverse ductility and impact values sit below the longitudinal ones. <b>The end face of a bar is more vulnerable than its cylindrical surface<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">303Se (S30323) \u2014 the same idea, with selenium<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>303Se<\/b> tries to do the same job with <b>selenium<\/b> instead of sulphur: ASTM A582 defines the grade with <b>Se \u22650.15 %<\/b> and <b>S \u22640.06 %<\/b>. Selenide inclusions tend to stay more globular than sulphides; the result is <b>better surface finish and cleaner behaviour in burnishing, thread rolling and tight-tolerance work<\/b>, and <b>somewhat better cold formability<\/b> than sulphurised 303. <b>But the corrosion problem does not go away<\/b> \u2014 only the chemistry of the inclusion changes. 303Se is <b>still a free-machining stainless and still below 304<\/b>. It is also effectively absent in Europe: <b>no W.Nr. equivalent for 303Se is widely published<\/b>, supply is US\/Asian and lead times are long.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">Are 1.4305 and S30300 the same thing?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>Commercially yes, at certificate level no.<\/b> Both are &#8220;303&#8221; and both do the same job, but <b>the composition bands are not identical<\/b>, and that difference decides whether a mill certificate is acceptable against a given specification. The two sharpest: <b>carbon<\/b> \u2014 ASTM A582 allows <b>\u22640.15 %<\/b>, EN 10088-3 allows <b>\u22640.10 %<\/b>; and <b>sulphur<\/b> \u2014 ASTM sets only a <b>LOWER<\/b> bound (<b>\u22650.15 %<\/b>, no upper limit), while EN sets <b>a band<\/b> (<b>0.15\u20130.35 %<\/b>). So <b>a heat with 0.45 % sulphur complies with ASTM A582 and does NOT comply with EN 1.4305<\/b>. The phosphorus gap is even wider: <b>ASTM \u22640.20 %<\/b> against <b>EN \u22640.045 %<\/b> \u2014 <b>more than four times<\/b>. If your customer buys to a European drawing and you ship an ASTM-certified bar, <b>phosphorus can fail you<\/b>.<\/p>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b1\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Standards by Product Form<\/h4>\n<p><!-- dm-diy-std --><\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #e3e9ec;margin:22px 0 26px;background:#fff;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#12303f;color:#fff;padding:9px 14px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.3px;position:relative;z-index:2;\">STANDARDS BY PRODUCT FORM<\/div>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Product form<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Standards<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Round bar, flat bar (including square and hexagon)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\"><b style=\"font-size:16.5px;font-weight:800;color:#12303f;\">AMS 5640<\/b> (SAE; bars, wire, mechanical tubing, forgings \u2014 Type 1 = S30300, Type 2 = S30323\/303Se) \u00b7 ASTM A582 \/ A582M (free-machining stainless bars, Condition A) \u00b7 ASTM A484 (general requirements) \u00b7 EN 10088-3 (1.4305)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Wire<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\"><b style=\"font-size:16.5px;font-weight:800;color:#12303f;\">AMS 5640<\/b> \u00b7 EN 10088-3. No separate ASTM wire specification for 303 could be confirmed.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Forging and forging stock<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\"><b style=\"font-size:16.5px;font-weight:800;color:#12303f;\">AMS 5640<\/b> (forgings included) \u00b7 ASTM A314 (billets and bars for forging) \u00b7 ASTM A484 (general requirements)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Fastener (bolt, stud)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">ASTM A320 Gr B8F (via Aircraft Materials). Not confirmed by four sources, so given for the record only.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Mechanical tubing<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\"><b style=\"font-size:16.5px;font-weight:800;color:#12303f;\">AMS 5640<\/b> (mechanical tubing is in scope). There is NO ASTM pipe specification for 303 for pressure service.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Plate, sheet and strip<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">NO CURRENT SPECIFICATION COULD BE CONFIRMED. ISSF and AZoM state that 303 is not produced in flat-rolled products. Sandmeyer and UPMET cite ASTM A895; the scope and status of that standard could not be confirmed by four sources and it is not on the card.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Flange, fitting, pressure equipment part<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NONE. 303 is not within ASTM A182, A403 or A312 and is not listed as a pressure material in ASME Section II Part D. For these forms 304\/304L or 316\/316L is used.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:6px 14px 12px;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.7;border-top:1px solid #f0f3f5;position:relative;z-index:2;\">AMS numbers first, ASTM after. AMS 5640 has two types: Type 1 = S30300, Type 2 = S30323 (303Se). The order must state the type. 303 is not within ASTM A276; the base is ASTM A582. For plate, sheet, pipe, flanges and fittings no confirmed specification exists for 303.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- \/dm-diy-std --><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>The most important part of this table is its empty rows.<\/b> 303 is <b>a bar and screw-machine grade<\/b>; it does <b>not appear<\/b> in sheet, plate, boiler tube, process pipe or pressure equipment specifications. Saying so up front prevents an order that will later be cancelled.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Standards by Product Form \u00b7 AISI 303 (S30300 \/ 1.4305)<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Bar \u00b7 rod \u00b7 section<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>ASTM A582 \/ A582M<\/b> \u2014 <i>Free-Machining Stainless Steel Bars<\/i>. This is the primary product specification for 303. It covers hot- and cold-finished bar and <b>explicitly EXCLUDES bars for forging<\/b>. General requirements run to <b>ASTM A484 \/ A484M<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Billets and bars for forging<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>ASTM A314<\/b> \u2014 <i>Stainless Steel Billets and Bars for Forging<\/i>. S30300 is within the scope. Because A582 excludes forging stock, <b>the forging chain runs through A314<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Wire and wire rod<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>ASTM A581 \/ A581M<\/b> \u2014 <i>Free-Machining Stainless Steel Wire and Wire Rods<\/i>; not A580 (general stainless wire)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Europe \u00b7 bar<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>EN 10088-3<\/b>, grade <b>1.4305 \/ X8CrNiS18-9<\/b>. Bar, rod, wire, sections and semi-finished product; delivery <b>+C<\/b>, <b>+SH<\/b> or annealed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Sheet \u00b7 plate \u00b7 strip<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>NONE.<\/b> ASTM A240 does not cover S30300; <b>EN 10088-2 does not include 1.4305<\/b> either. Anything sold as &#8220;303 plate&#8221; is either another grade or a mill product with <b>no product standard behind it<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Seamless \/ welded pipe \u00b7 tube<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>NONE.<\/b> ASTM A312, A213, A249, A269, A358 \u2014 <b>not one of them lists S30300<\/b>. There is a metallurgical reason: tube making means welding and\/or heavy cold deformation, and 303 tolerates neither<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Fittings \u00b7 flanges<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>NONE.<\/b> ASTM A403 (wrought fittings) and A182 (flanges and forged parts) do not list S30300. A 303 flange is <b>machined from bar<\/b> and <b>cannot carry any pressure-class certification<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Bolts \u00b7 nuts<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>There is NO dedicated pressure-class specification.<\/b> The ASTM A193 B8 family is based on 304\/316, not on 303. 303 fasteners are common but fall under <b>ISO 3506 class A1<\/b> \u2014 and ISO 3506 explicitly flags <b>A1 as the low-corrosion-resistance free-machining class<\/b>. <b>Confusing A1 with A2 is a classic purchasing error<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Welding wire \u00b7 electrode<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>NONE, and there should be none.<\/b> No filler metal is made to 303 chemistry; sulphur in weld metal means hot cracking directly<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>ASME Section IX P \/ F number<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>No P-Number assignment for S30300 could be verified.<\/b> 304, 316 and their relatives are <b>P-No. 8 Group 1<\/b>; 303 is a grade that was never designed for welding and <b>should not be used as the basis of a WPS<\/b>. <b>Do not publish a P number<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Pressure equipment<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>OUT OF SCOPE.<\/b> ASME Section VIII, Section I, B31.1, B31.3 \u2014 <b>none of them carries an allowable stress for S30300<\/b>. Do not expect pressure-equipment material approval for 1.4305 on the PED route either<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b2\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">ASME and Pressure Code Status \u2014 Short and Clear<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>This section is normally a table of numbers; for 303 it is a table of refusals, and it should be published as such.<\/b><\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Code Acceptance \u00b7 AISI 303 (S30300)<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>ASME Section VIII Div. 1 \/ Div. 2<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>NOT ACCEPTED<\/b> \u2014 S30300 is not listed with an allowable stress in Section II Part D<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>ASME Section I (power boilers)<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>NOT ACCEPTED<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>ASME B31.1 \/ B31.3<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>NOT ACCEPTED<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>ASME B16.5 \/ B16.34<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>NOT ACCEPTED<\/b> \u2014 303 is not a flange or valve body material<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>NACE MR0175 \/ ISO 15156<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Not listed.<\/b> A high-sulphur free-machining grade is not even a candidate for sour service. <b>Never issue a &#8220;NACE compliant 303&#8221; certificate<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>In practice<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Non-pressure internals, shafts, bushings, gears, fasteners, set screws, valve stem nuts, instrument bodies \u2014 <b>anywhere code coverage is not required<\/b>. If a pressure boundary is needed, the answer is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-304\/\">AISI 304<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-304l\/\">304L<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-316l\/\">316L<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b3\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Product Forms With NO Standard \u2014 the Section Your Sales Engineers Should Memorise<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>Most 303 enquiries are actually for a product form that 303 cannot serve.<\/b> The rows below prevent a cancellation, a return cost and a loss of trust.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Specification Gaps for S30300<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>&#8220;303 plate \/ sheet&#8221;<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>No such product standard exists.<\/b> ASTM A240 and EN 10088-2 do not include 1.4305. When the enquiry arrives, the right question is: <i>&#8220;why does this part have to come from plate?&#8221;<\/i> The answer is usually <b>&#8220;it will be heavily machined&#8221;<\/b> \u2014 then <b>cut it from heavy bar<\/b>. If the answer is &#8220;it will be welded&#8221;, <b>303 is the wrong grade to begin with<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>&#8220;303 pipe \/ tube&#8221;<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>None.<\/b> Anything on the market called &#8220;303 tube&#8221; is either <b>gun-drilled from bar<\/b> or mislabelled. If it will carry pressure, it cannot be certified under any standard<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>&#8220;303 flange&#8221;<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>No standard exists.<\/b> A machined 303 flange can be made, but it <b>cannot carry an ASME B16.5 pressure-temperature class<\/b>. Write &#8220;machined part to drawing&#8221; on the quotation, not &#8220;B16.5 flange&#8221;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>&#8220;303 casting&#8221;<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>303 has no cast equivalent.<\/b> The austenitic cast grades are ASTM A743\/A744 <b>CF-8 (\u2248304)<\/b> and <b>CF-8M (\u2248316)<\/b>; these are <b>not free-machining grades<\/b>. Offer CF-8 to a customer asking for &#8220;cast 303&#8221; and <b>say plainly that machinability will not be like 303<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>&#8220;Welded 303 structure&#8221;<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Do not.<\/b> If welding is required, the grade was chosen wrong at the start. The correct move is to <b>make the part in 304 and accept the machinability loss<\/b>, or to move to an <b>improved-machinability 304 variant<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>&#8220;Food-contact 303&#8221;<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Challenge it.<\/b> A sulphurised grade is not appropriate where cleanability and pitting resistance matter; hygienic equipment is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-304\/\">304<\/a> \/ <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-316l\/\">316L<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Aerospace (AMS)<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>No AMS product specification for 303 could be independently verified.<\/b> Confirm against the current AMS index first<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b4\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Chemical Composition<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>There are two separate systems here, and mixing the rows leads to certificate rejection.<\/b><\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">ASTM A582 \u00b7 mass %<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>S30300 (303)<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>C \u22640.15<\/b> \u00b7 Mn \u22642.00 \u00b7 <b>P \u22640.20<\/b> \u00b7 <b>S \u22650.15 (MINIMUM; NO upper limit)<\/b> \u00b7 Si \u22641.00 \u00b7 <b>Cr 17.00\u201319.00<\/b> \u00b7 <b>Ni 8.00\u201310.00<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>S30323 (303Se)<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">C \u22640.15 \u00b7 Mn \u22642.00 \u00b7 P \u22640.20 \u00b7 <b>S \u22640.06<\/b> \u00b7 Si \u22641.00 \u00b7 Cr 17.00\u201319.00 \u00b7 Ni 8.00\u201310.00 \u00b7 <b>Se \u22650.15 (MINIMUM)<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>No upper limit on sulphur<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>The most overlooked feature of the ASTM route.<\/b> A mill may land anywhere between 0.15 % and 0.40 %, and all of it complies with A582. <b>Machinability and corrosion resistance both vary materially across that band.<\/b> If you want consistent behaviour on the machine, <b>write your own sulphur band into the order<\/b> \u2014 the standard will not protect you<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">EN 10088-3 \u00b7 1.4305 \/ X8CrNiS18-9 \u00b7 mass %<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Carbon<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>\u22640.10<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Silicon<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\u22641.00<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Manganese<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">\u22642.00<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Phosphorus<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>\u22640.045<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Sulphur<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>0.15\u20130.35 (A BAND \u2014 both lower and upper limit)<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Chromium<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">17.0\u201319.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Nickel<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">8.0\u201310.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Copper<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>\u22641.00<\/b> (a limit that does not exist in the ASTM table)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Nitrogen<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>\u22640.11<\/b> (a limit that does not exist in the ASTM table)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">ASTM vs EN Divergences \u2014 the Ones That Actually Matter on a Certificate<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Carbon<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>ASTM \u22640.15<\/b> \u00b7 <b>EN \u22640.10<\/b>. <b>EN is tighter.<\/b> A heat at C = 0.12 % passes A582 and fails 1.4305<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Phosphorus<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>ASTM \u22640.20<\/b> \u00b7 <b>EN \u22640.045<\/b> \u2014 <b>more than four times<\/b>. Phosphorus also contributes to chip breaking, but it raises grain-boundary embrittlement and hot-cracking risk. <b>This single row sums up the philosophy of the two standards<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Sulphur<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>ASTM: only \u22650.15<\/b> \u00b7 <b>EN: 0.15\u20130.35<\/b>. <b>ASTM has no ceiling.<\/b> A high-sulphur ASTM heat is excellent on the machine and poor in corrosion and transverse ductility<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Cu and N<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">EN imposes <b>Cu \u22641.00<\/b> and <b>N \u22640.11<\/b>; neither element appears in the A582 table. Copper is <b>deliberately added in some producer variants to lower work hardening<\/b> \u2014 watch the EN ceiling in that case<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>How to order<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">If the customer says &#8220;303&#8221;, ask <b>against which document<\/b>. <b>A582<\/b> and <b>1.4305<\/b> are two different acceptance criteria for the same material; if you want a dual-certified heat, write the <b>C \u22640.10 and P \u22640.045<\/b> restriction explicitly into the mill order<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b5\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Mechanical Properties<\/h4>\n<p><!-- dm-diy-sert --><\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #e3e9ec;margin:22px 0 26px;background:#fff;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#12303f;color:#fff;padding:9px 14px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.3px;position:relative;z-index:2;\">STRENGTH VALUES<\/div>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"padding:12px 10px 0;\"><svg viewBox=\"0 0 740 418\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto;display:block;\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" role=\"img\"><rect x=\"16\" y=\"6\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\" fill=\"#12303f\"\/><text x=\"34\" y=\"16\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">Yield (MPa)<\/text><rect x=\"146\" y=\"6\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"164\" y=\"16\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">Tensile (MPa)<\/text><text x=\"16\" y=\"44\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"bold\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">Penn Stainless \u00b7 303 bar (supplier specification summary)<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"50\" width=\"516.6\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"539.6\" y=\"62\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">515<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"68\" width=\"205.6\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#12303f\"\/><text x=\"228.6\" y=\"80\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">205<\/text><text x=\"16\" y=\"108\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"bold\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">ISSF \/ worldstainless \u00b7 303 TYPICAL values<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"114\" width=\"652.0\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"675.0\" y=\"126\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">650<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"132\" width=\"300.9\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#12303f\"\/><text x=\"323.9\" y=\"144\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">300<\/text><text x=\"16\" y=\"172\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"bold\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">Sandmeyer Steel \u00b7 303 TYPICAL values (20 \u00b0C)<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"178\" width=\"587.8\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"610.8\" y=\"190\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">586<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"196\" width=\"311.0\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#12303f\"\/><text x=\"334.0\" y=\"208\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">310<\/text><text x=\"16\" y=\"236\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"bold\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">Aircraft Materials \u00b7 303, TYPICAL values annealed from 1900 \u00b0F<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"242\" width=\"621.9\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"644.9\" y=\"254\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">620<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"260\" width=\"241.7\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#12303f\"\/><text x=\"264.7\" y=\"272\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">241<\/text><text x=\"16\" y=\"300\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"bold\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">EN 10088-3 \u00b7 1.4305 bar (via thyssenkrupp and Virgamet)<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"306\" width=\"501.5\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"524.5\" y=\"318\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">500<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"324\" width=\"190.6\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#12303f\"\/><text x=\"213.6\" y=\"336\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">190<\/text><text x=\"16\" y=\"364\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"bold\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">HT Pipe \u00b7 ASTM A276 Type 303 row \u2014 SHOULD NOT BE USED<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"370\" width=\"516.6\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"539.6\" y=\"382\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">515<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"388\" width=\"205.6\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#12303f\"\/><text x=\"228.6\" y=\"400\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">205<\/text><\/svg><\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Condition<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Hardness<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Yield MPa<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Tensile MPa<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Elongation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">ASTM A582 Condition A \u00b7 annealed bar \u2014 SPECIFICATION CEILING<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">262 HBW max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Penn Stainless \u00b7 303 bar (supplier specification summary)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">228 HBW max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">205<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">515<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">35%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">ISSF \/ worldstainless \u00b7 303 TYPICAL values<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">262 HBW max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">300<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">650<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">45%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Sandmeyer Steel \u00b7 303 TYPICAL values (20 \u00b0C)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">202 HBW<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">310<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">586<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">50%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Aircraft Materials \u00b7 303, TYPICAL values annealed from 1900 \u00b0F<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">160 HBW<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">241<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">620<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">50%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">EN 10088-3 \u00b7 1.4305 bar (via thyssenkrupp and Virgamet)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">\u2264230 HB (Virgamet)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">190<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">500-750<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">35%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">HT Pipe \u00b7 ASTM A276 Type 303 row \u2014 SHOULD NOT BE USED<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">201 HB \/ 92 HRB max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">205<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">515<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">30%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:6px 14px 12px;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.7;border-top:1px solid #f0f3f5;position:relative;z-index:2;\"><b style=\"color:#12303f;\">BECAUSE THIS ALLOY IS NOT PRECIPITATION HARDENABLE, the rows are split by SPECIFICATION and SOURCE TYPE, not by ageing condition; there is NO condition column such as H900 or H1075. NOTE \u2014 for 303 no single numerical mechanical minimum could be found with THE SAME VALUE in four independent sources. The reason is not metallurgical but specification-driven: the primary specification for 303 is ASTM A582, and for Condition A that standard sets a HARDNESS CEILING rather than tensile and yield minimums (on small sections a tension test is converted to hardness). The rows below are therefore given NOT as single numbers but EACH UNDER ITS SOURCE NAME; NO AVERAGE IS TAKEN. The value used in a calculation must be read from the table of the specification the order is placed against, together with the diameter range. COLD-WORKED TEMPERS ARE NOT IN THIS TABLE.<\/b> In the chart, a value given as a range is drawn at its lower bound; the full range is in the table. The rows are split by specification and source type, not by ageing condition. A typical value must not be confused with a specification minimum; a typical value never goes into a calculation. For 303 no single mechanical minimum could be found with the same value in four independent sources. Cold-worked tempers are not in the table.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- \/dm-diy-sert --><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>The trap in the mechanical section of 303 is this:<\/b> the primary US bar specification, <b>ASTM A582, sets NO tensile \/ yield \/ elongation minimum for S30300<\/b> \u2014 only a <b>hardness ceiling<\/b>. The great majority of published &#8220;303 mechanical properties&#8221; are <b>typical mill values, not specification minima<\/b>. The European route is the exact opposite: <b>EN 10088-3 sets real minima.<\/b><\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Two Separate Systems \u2014 DO NOT Mix the Rows<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>ASTM A582 \u00b7 S30300, annealed<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Hardness only: \u2264262 HBW.<\/b> There is <b>no specification minimum<\/b> for tensile, yield, elongation or reduction of area<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>ASTM route \u00b7 typical values<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Annealed bar typically <b>tensile ~650 MPa<\/b>, <b>yield ~300 MPa<\/b>, <b>elongation ~45 %<\/b> (typical, not guaranteed). In cold-drawn bar up to \u230025.4 mm, <b>strength rises markedly and elongation falls<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>EN 10088-3 \u00b7 1.4305, \u2300 \u2264160 mm<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Rp0.2 \u2265190 MPa<\/b> \u00b7 <b>Rp1.0 \u2265225 MPa<\/b> \u00b7 <b>Rm 500\u2013750 MPa<\/b> \u00b7 <b>A \u226535 %<\/b> \u00b7 <b>\u2264230 HB<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>In EN, Rm is a BAND<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">ASTM sets no floor at all; EN sets both a floor and a <b>ceiling<\/b> (750 MPa). <b>A heavily drawn bar can fall outside the EN band.<\/b> For a shop holding tight tolerances this is actually good news: the EN band also <b>bounds machine behaviour<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Hardness divergence<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>ASTM \u2264262 HBW<\/b> \u00b7 <b>EN \u2264230 HB<\/b>. <b>EN is tighter<\/b>, and when both are printed side by side on one page the reader cannot tell which governs. <b>Whichever document the order was placed against governs<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Diameter Effect in Cold-Drawn Bar \u2014 There Is No Single &#8220;303 Strength&#8221;<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">\u2300 \u226440 mm, cold drawn<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Rm ~600\u2013950 MPa<\/b> (producer band)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">\u2300 >63\u2013100 mm, cold drawn<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Rm ~500\u2013750 MPa<\/b> \u2014 back to the annealed band<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Cold drawn wire \u23005\u201316 mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Rm \u2264800 MPa<\/b> \u00b7 <b>A \u226535 %<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Why<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">In cold drawing <b>the whole section does not receive the same strain<\/b>: in a thin bar surface and centre harden together, in a heavy bar only the outer shell hardens. <b>So do not expect &#8220;high strength&#8221; from large-diameter 303 bar<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Commercial consequence<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>&#8220;What is the yield strength of 303?&#8221; has no single answer.<\/b> The correct answer: no number can be given without the <b>diameter, the delivery condition (annealed \/ cold drawn \/ peeled) and the specification<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>It cannot be hardened.<\/b> 303 is fully austenitic; it <b>cannot be hardened by heat treatment<\/b>. Strength rises only through <b>cold deformation<\/b> \u2014 and 303&#8217;s capacity for cold deformation is limited. If you need a hardenable stainless that also machines well, the candidates are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/17-4ph-1-4542-aisi-630\/\">17-4 PH<\/a> and the martensitic free-machining grades; <b>303 is not on that list<\/b>.<\/p>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b6\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Physical Properties<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>Warning:<\/b> 303 physical data circulates in two different &#8220;schools&#8221; among publishers. Both are given separately below; <b>do NOT average them<\/b>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Physical Properties \u00b7 AISI 303 \/ 1.4305<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Density<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>CONFLICT:<\/b> one group of publishers prints <b>7.9 g\/cm\u00b3<\/b>, another prints <b>8.03 g\/cm\u00b3<\/b>. The gap is <b>1.6 %<\/b> and it is material on long bar priced by weight. <b>If you calculate with it, state which value you used<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Melting range<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>CONFLICT:<\/b> published either as <b>1400\u20131450 \u00b0C<\/b> (a range) or as <b>~1455 \u00b0C<\/b> (a single point). The single-point figure is physically misleading anyway: a multi-component alloy <b>melts over a range<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Modulus of elasticity<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>193 GPa<\/b> (the usual value for austenitic 18-8)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Thermal conductivity<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>16.3 W\/m\u00b7K<\/b> (100 \u00b0C) \u00b7 <b>21.5 W\/m\u00b7K<\/b> (500 \u00b0C) \u00b7 one European mill gives <b>15 W\/m\u00b7K<\/b> at 20 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Mean thermal expansion<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>17.3 \u00d7 10\u207b\u2076 \/K<\/b> (0\u2013100 \u00b0C) \u00b7 <b>17.8<\/b> (0\u2013315 \u00b0C) \u00b7 <b>18.4<\/b> (0\u2013538 \u00b0C)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Electrical resistivity<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>720 n\u03a9\u00b7m<\/b> (0.72 \u00b5\u03a9\u00b7m) \u00b7 on the European route <b>0.73 \u03a9\u00b7mm\u00b2\/m<\/b> \u2014 the same magnitude<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Specific heat (0\u2013100 \u00b0C)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>500 J\/kg\u00b7K<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Magnetic response<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Effectively non-magnetic in the solution-annealed condition<\/b> (one mill publishes <b>\u00b5r \u22641.3<\/b>; another publisher gives <b>~1.02<\/b>). <b>It becomes slightly magnetic after cold work<\/b>, because deformation produces <b>strain-induced martensite<\/b>. <b>A cold-drawn 303 bar attracting a magnet lightly is not a quality defect<\/b>; conversely, if a buyer specification says &#8220;stainless does not attract a magnet&#8221;, settle that before the order<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>What matters commercially<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Thermal expansion is <b>about 1.4\u20131.5 times that of carbon steel<\/b>, and thermal conductivity is <b>roughly one third<\/b>. Together this means <b>heat goes into the tool<\/b> and <b>the part changes size as it cools<\/b>: fix the measuring temperature<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b7\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Heat Treatment and Thermal Stability<\/h4>\n<p><!-- dm-diy-isil --><\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #e3e9ec;margin:22px 0 26px;background:#fff;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#12303f;color:#fff;padding:9px 14px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.3px;position:relative;z-index:2;\">HEAT TREATMENT \u2014 SCHEMATIC<\/div>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"padding:10px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:6px 0 6px;\">1 \u00b7 SOLUTION ANNEAL \u2014 this is the only valid heat treatment<\/div>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Step<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1 \u00b7 SOLUTION ANNEAL \u2014 this is the only valid heat treatment<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Summary<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">It reverses cold work, takes carbides into solid solution and renews the grain structure. IT DOES NOT RAISE STRENGTH, IT LOWERS IT. This is the ASTM A582 Condition A delivery state.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Temperature<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Approximately 1010-1120 \u00b0C. BY SOURCE NAME: ISSF\/worldstainless 1010-1120 \u00b0C \u00b7 AZoM 1010-1120 \u00b0C \u00b7 thyssenkrupp 1010-1120 \u00b0C \u00b7 Virgamet 1000-1100 \u00b0C \u00b7 UPMET 982-1043 \u00b0C (1800-2000 \u00b0F, upper end for ductility) \u00b7 Sandmeyer a minimum of 1038 \u00b0C (1900 \u00b0F) \u00b7 Aircraft Materials quotes typical properties for the 1900 \u00b0F annealed condition. NO AVERAGE IS TAKEN.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Time<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">No numerical soak time could be confirmed in four independent sources, so NONE IS WRITTEN. In practice the time is set by getting the whole section to temperature; extending it brings grain growth, not benefit.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Cooling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">RAPID COOLING IS MANDATORY \u2014 it is a metallurgical requirement, not a preference. Sandmeyer says &#8216;water quench or rapid cool by other means&#8217;; UPMET says the material &#8216;should be water quenched from the annealing temperature to prevent harmful carbide precipitation&#8217;; ISSF, AZoM and thyssenkrupp say &#8216;cool rapidly&#8217;. Slow cooling holds the part inside the 425-860 \u00b0C sensitization band and voids the treatment.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Resulting hardness<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">The ASTM A582 Condition A ceiling is 262 HBW (Boltport; ISSF also gives 262 HB max). Penn Stainless gives a 228 HB ceiling on its own page \u2014 the two numbers are not the same and the conflict is recorded. Supplier typical measurements: Sandmeyer 202 HB, Aircraft Materials 160 HB.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:10px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:6px 0 6px;\">2 \u00b7 POST-WELD SOLUTION ANNEAL \u2014 only if welding is unavoidable<\/div>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Step<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">2 \u00b7 POST-WELD SOLUTION ANNEAL \u2014 only if welding is unavoidable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Summary<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">This is not a strengthening step. It exists to redissolve the chromium carbides precipitated at the grain boundaries by the welding thermal cycle and to partly recover corrosion resistance.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Temperature<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">IDENTICAL to the solution annealing band of step 1; there is no separate recipe.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Time<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">No numerical soak time could be confirmed in four independent sources.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Cooling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Rapid cooling \/ quench. Slow cooling voids the treatment.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Resulting hardness<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">No hardness change is expected; the aim is corrosion resistance, not hardness. WARNING: a post-weld anneal does NOT bring the corrosion resistance of 303 up to the level of 304; the sulphide inclusions stay where they are. ISSF states that welded 303 gives poor properties even after annealing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:10px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:6px 0 6px;\">3 \u00b7 STRESS RELIEF \u2014 NO NUMERICAL RECIPE IS GIVEN<\/div>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Step<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">3 \u00b7 STRESS RELIEF \u2014 NO NUMERICAL RECIPE IS GIVEN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Summary<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">In an austenitic structure a stress relief has to be done without passing through the sensitization band, so there is no single standard recipe.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Temperature<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NO SINGLE NUMERICAL RECIPE IS GIVEN \u2014 for 303 no temperature\/time pair could be confirmed by four independent sources. PRACTICAL RULE: do not hold the part in the 425-860 \u00b0C band; either do a partial relief well below the band, or go up to a full solution anneal and cool rapidly.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Time<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Not confirmed \u2014 not written.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Cooling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Not confirmed \u2014 not written.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Resulting hardness<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Not confirmed \u2014 not written.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:10px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:6px 0 6px;\">4 \u00b7 COLD WORK \u2014 the ONLY way to raise strength<\/div>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Step<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">4 \u00b7 COLD WORK \u2014 the ONLY way to raise strength<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Summary<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">This is NOT a heat treatment step; it is placed in the diagram so that it is not confused with one. 303 is not precipitation hardened and is not aged. Yield and tensile strength rise only through cold drawing or cold rolling.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Temperature<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Room temperature (cold drawing \/ cold rolling).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Time<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Not applicable.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Cooling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Not applicable.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Resulting hardness<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">In cold-drawn bar hardness and strength rise while elongation falls. The numerical minimums of the cold-worked tempers of 303 could not be confirmed by four independent sources and are therefore NOT in the diagram; what was found is in the &#8216;atlananlar&#8217; list.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:10px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:6px 0 6px;\">SENSITIZATION BAND \u2014 chromium carbide (M23C6) precipitation, 425-860 \u00b0C<\/div>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Step<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">SENSITIZATION BAND \u2014 chromium carbide (M23C6) precipitation, 425-860 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">What happens<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">In this band chromium precipitates as chromium carbide at the grain boundaries; the region next to the boundary is depleted in chromium and the material becomes open to intergranular corrosion. This is NOT a hardening step, it is a REGION TO BE AVOIDED.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">As named in the source<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">ISSF\/worldstainless says for 303 that &#8216;continuous use in the 425-860 \u00b0C range is not usually recommended due to carbide precipitation&#8217; \u00b7 AZoM gives the same band on its 303 page \u00b7 thyssenkrupp says for 303 that it &#8216;is sensitive to carbide precipitation with continuous use at 425-860 \u00b0C&#8217; \u00b7 Aalco gives the same band for the austenitic family (1.4401 and 1.4571). Four independent organizations give the same band ends; NO AVERAGE IS TAKEN, the band is written as it stands.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Mechanism warning<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">The carbon ceiling of 303 under ASTM A582 is 0.15%, roughly twice the ceiling of 304 (0.07-0.08%). The amount of carbon available to precipitate in the same band is correspondingly larger. 303 has NO low-carbon sister grade like 304L; the option of beating the band by lowering carbon does not exist for this grade.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:6px 14px 12px;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.7;border-top:1px solid #f0f3f5;position:relative;z-index:2;\">The scheme is schematic; the time axis is NOT to scale. No published TTT\/CCT curve was used, so no curve is drawn. THIS ALLOY IS AUSTENITIC: it is produced by SOLUTION ANNEALING + RAPID COOLING, it is NOT PRECIPITATION HARDENABLE and cannot be hardened by heat treatment. There is NO hardening step such as H900 \/ H1025 \/ H1075 and none is drawn. The ONLY way to raise strength is COLD WORK; heat treatment lowers it. Sulphur does not change the heat treatment temperatures; it changes the weldability and the corrosion resistance of the result. The scheme is schematic; the time axis is not to scale. This alloy is NOT PRECIPITATION HARDENABLE; there is no ageing step. RAPID COOLING after the solution anneal is mandatory. The 425-860 \u00b0C band is a region to be avoided, not a hardening step. Strength is raised only by cold work.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- \/dm-diy-isil --><\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Solution Annealing and Hot Working<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Solution annealing<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Heat to <b>1010\u20131120 \u00b0C<\/b> and <b>cool rapidly<\/b>. On the European mill route <b>1000\u20131100 \u00b0C<\/b>, water or air cooled. <b>The two ranges do not conflict; the common band is 1010\u20131100 \u00b0C<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Rapid cooling is NOT optional<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">The purpose of the anneal is <b>to dissolve chromium carbides and freeze them in the austenite<\/b>. Slow furnace cooling <b>recreates the very problem the anneal was performed to remove<\/b> \u2014 and faster than in 304, because of the higher carbon<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Hot forging \/ forming<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>900\u20131200 \u00b0C<\/b> (one publisher gives <b>925\u20131260 \u00b0C<\/b>). <b>Re-anneal after hot working if corrosion resistance matters<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Not hardenable<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Cannot be hardened by heat treatment.<\/b> There is no quench-and-temper or comparable hardening recipe. Hardness comes only from <b>cold deformation<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Sensitization \u2014 Why It Is Worse in 303<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>The dangerous window<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>425\u2013860 \u00b0C.<\/b> In this band chromium precipitates at the grain boundaries as <b>chromium carbide (M\u2082\u2083C\u2086)<\/b>; the zone immediately adjacent becomes <b>chromium depleted<\/b> and the passive film weakens there. The result is <b>intergranular corrosion<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Why it is worse in 303<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Carbon.<\/b> ASTM A582 allows 303 <b>up to 0.15 % carbon<\/b> \u2014 <b>five times<\/b> that of 304L and roughly <b>twice<\/b> that of 304. The more carbon there is to precipitate, the faster and more pervasive sensitization is. <b>303 is not, and cannot be, an &#8220;L&#8221; grade<\/b> \u2014 lowering carbon would not remove the free-machining behaviour but would wreck its economics, and the sulphur problem would remain<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>The producer statement<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">One mill asks the intergranular-corrosion question separately for the <b>as-delivered<\/b> and the <b>as-welded<\/b> condition and answers <b>NO<\/b> to both for 1.4305. <b>That is a specification declaration, not marketing copy<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Service temperature<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Published oxidation limits: <b>760 \u00b0C in intermittent service<\/b>, <b>870 \u00b0C in continuous service<\/b>. <b>But those numbers concern scaling only.<\/b> If the part must later show corrosion resistance in an aqueous environment, <b>the 425\u2013860 \u00b0C band is effectively forbidden<\/b> and the real limit is far lower<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>The intermittent &lt; continuous paradox<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>The intermittent limit (760 \u00b0C) being LOWER than the continuous limit (870 \u00b0C) is not a typographical error.<\/b> Intermittent service drags the part <b>repeatedly through the carbide precipitation band<\/b> on every heating and cooling cycle, and cracks the scale layer each time. <b>A part sitting continuously hot pays neither penalty.<\/b> The same logic applies to 304<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b8\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Welding<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>The honest heading for this section is: 303 was not designed to be welded.<\/b> What follows is not &#8220;how to weld it well&#8221; but <b>&#8220;how to limit the damage if it is unavoidable&#8221;<\/b>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Welding \u00b7 AISI 303<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Baseline position<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Not recommended.<\/b> Sulphur and phosphorus form <b>low-melting sulphide\/phosphide films<\/b> in the weld pool; these are pushed to the solidifying grain boundaries and open up under shrinkage stress as <b>hot (solidification) cracking<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Pre-qualification<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">A national welding standard (AS 1554.6) <b>does not pre-qualify welding of 303<\/b> \u2014 the procedure cannot be taken as accepted, and <b>each joint requires separate qualification<\/b>, with no guarantee it will pass<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>If unavoidable \u00b7 filler<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Published recommendations diverge: one group says <b>308L or 309<\/b>, another says <b>E312 (29Cr-9Ni)<\/b>. <b>The logic is the same:<\/b> pick a high-ferrite filler so the weld metal contains <b>\u03b4-ferrite<\/b>. Ferrite dissolves sulphur and phosphorus far better than austenite and interrupts the crack path. <b>E312 gives the most ferrite, 309 sits between, 308L gives the least.<\/b> On a critical joint, move towards E312<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>What not to do<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Do NOT weld autogenously (no filler).<\/b> Without filler the pool is pure base metal chemistry \u2014 full sulphur. <b>Hot cracking is close to certain.<\/b> For the same reason <b>resistance and laser welding are also risky<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Heat input and interpass<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>As low as possible.<\/b> Small bead cross-section, fast travel, cold interpass. <b>No published numeric kJ\/mm limit was found \u2014 do not invent one<\/b>; the rule is qualitative: keep the pool small and short-lived<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>After welding<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Post-weld solution annealing is needed for maximum corrosion resistance \u2014 but in the producer&#8217;s own words the result stays <b>poor both mechanically and for corrosion protection<\/b>. <b>So PWHT does not solve the problem, it only softens it<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>The right decision<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">If the part will be welded, <b>change the material<\/b>. In the same 18-8 family, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-304\/\">304<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-304l\/\">304L<\/a> weld without trouble; <b>the lost machinability is cheaper than a cracked joint<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b9\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Machining<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>303 exists for this section.<\/b> The figures below are <b>starting values<\/b>; machine rigidity, tool quality and coolant strategy will move them more than anything else.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Machinability Ratings \u2014 Sources Diverge, the Ratio Holds<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>AISI 303<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>69 % \u2013 78 %<\/b> (depending on publisher)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>AISI 304 \/ 304L<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>40 % \u2013 45 %<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>AISI 316 \/ 316L<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>36 % \u2013 42 %<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>AISI 321 \/ 347<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>35 % \u2013 36 %<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>AISI 430F<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>55 % \u2013 75 %<\/b> \u2014 <b>the ferritic free-machining grade<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>How to read this<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Absolute numbers swing by 10 percentage points between publishers<\/b>, because the reference steel (B1112 or B1212), the tooling and the criterion all differ. <b>What is reliable is the ratio: 303 is roughly 1.7\u20131.8 times faster than 304 and close to twice as fast as 316.<\/b> Rather than writing &#8220;machinability 78 %&#8221; on a quotation, <b>write &#8220;approximately 1.75\u00d7 that of 304&#8221;<\/b> \u2014 that is what can be defended<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Starting Parameters \u00b7 303 Bar<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Turning \u00b7 roughing<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Coated carbide \u00b7 <b>~90\u2013180 m\/min<\/b> \u00b7 feed <b>0.15\u20130.35 mm\/rev<\/b> \u00b7 depth of cut <b>1.5\u20134 mm<\/b>. <b>Cut deep and steady<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Turning \u00b7 finishing<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Coated carbide, positive rake, small nose radius \u00b7 <b>~150\u2013270 m\/min<\/b> \u00b7 feed <b>0.05\u20130.15 mm\/rev<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Milling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>~100\u2013200 m\/min<\/b> \u00b7 <b>0.05\u20130.15 mm<\/b>\/tooth<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Drilling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>~60\u2013130 m\/min<\/b> (coated carbide) \u00b7 feed <b>0.05\u20130.20 mm\/rev<\/b> by diameter. <b>Through-coolant is the best answer for chip evacuation<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Parting<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>~100\u2013145 m\/min<\/b> \u00b7 <b>never dwell<\/b> \u2014 reduce the feed near centre, but never to zero<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Threading \u00b7 tapping<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">A <b>sulphurised\/chlorinated cutting oil<\/b> makes a visible difference in tapping. <b>But that oil must be completely removed before any heat treatment or welding<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Governing rules<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Austenitic stainless work hardens \u2014 303 does too, just less.<\/b> Three rules: <b>(1) clamp rigidly<\/b>, <b>(2) never rub, never dwell<\/b> \u2014 a stalled feed burnishes the surface and the next pass has to cut a work-hardened skin, <b>(3) cut UNDER the hardened skin<\/b> \u2014 keep the depth of cut larger than the work-hardened layer<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>Is there really a sulphur-free alternative?<\/b> Yes, but a limited one. The major mills produce <b>improved-machinability 304 variants<\/b>: controlled sulphur (well below free-machining levels), controlled inclusion shape, low residual elements and tight grain size. They <b>do not reach 303 speeds<\/b>, but they are <b>clearly above standard 304 and they weld like 304 and corrode like 304<\/b>. These variants <b>carry no separate AISI number<\/b> \u2014 the ASTM chemistry is still S30400\/S30403. <b>The correct commercial sentence is:<\/b> &#8220;If there is welding or corrosion, do not go to a free-machining grade; ask for improved-machinability 304 and get the supplier to confirm it <b>by mill brand name<\/b>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b10\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Corrosion \u2014 Where It Works, Where It FAILS<\/h4>\n<p><!-- dm-diy-kars --><\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #e3e9ec;margin:22px 0 26px;background:#fff;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#12303f;color:#fff;padding:9px 14px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.3px;position:relative;z-index:2;\">303 \u00b7 904L \u00b7 NITRONIC 50 \u2014 COMPARED WITH 304 AND 316<\/div>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"padding:10px 14px 0;font-size:12.5px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.7;\">CRITERION: (A) STRENGTH \u2014 ASTM A479 \/ A479M annealed bar SPECIFICATION MINIMUMS, FROM ONE AND THE SAME TABLE, at room temperature. (B) CORROSION RESISTANCE \u2014 the Cr, Mo, N and Cu contents taken from the composition tables of the same specifications, together with PUBLISHED PREN values (formula: PREN = %Cr + 3.3\u00d7%Mo + 16\u00d7%N, NeoNickel). (C) a critical crevice corrosion temperature measured by a single laboratory in a single test. THE BLOCKS ARE NOT SUMMED AND NOT PUT ON ONE AXIS. Different specifications are not compared on the same row.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:8px 12px 0;font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">A \u00b7 STRENGTH \u2014 ASTM A479\/A479M annealed bar minimums (SAME TABLE, Boltport)<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:2px 12px 0;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.6;\">ASTM A479 \/ A479M, annealed condition, room temperature. The values are SPECIFICATION MINIMUMS, not typical values.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Criterion<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 304<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 316<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 904L<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Nitronic 50<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 303<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Difference<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Tensile strength minimum (MPa)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">515<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">515<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">490<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">690<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NOT WITHIN A479<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Nitronic 50 is 1.34 times 304 and 316. 904L has the LOWEST tensile minimum in this table.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Yield strength minimum 0.2% (MPa)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">205<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">205<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">220<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">380<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">NOT WITHIN A479<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Nitronic 50 is 1.85 times 304 and 316 \u2014 this is where nitrogen strengthening is read. 904L is 15 MPa above 304.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Elongation minimum<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">30%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">30%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">35%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">35%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NOT WITHIN A479<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">904L and Nitronic 50 are MORE ductile than 304\/316; the strength gain was not paid for in ductility.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Reduction of area minimum<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">40%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">40%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">not given<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">55%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">NOT WITHIN A479<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">15 points in favour of Nitronic 50.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Hardness ceiling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">not given<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">not given<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">not given<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">293 HBW max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">ASTM A582 Condition A: 262 HBW max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">This hardness ceiling is the only numerical specification requirement for 303; A582 carries no tensile or yield minimum.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:8px 12px 0;font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">B \u00b7 CORROSION RESISTANCE \u2014 composition (ASTM specification tables) and PUBLISHED PREN values<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:2px 12px 0;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.6;\">The composition figures are taken from the tables of ASTM A240 (304, 316, N08904), ASTM A479\/A276 (S20910) and ASTM A582 (S30300). The PREN values are NOT CALCULATED; they are quoted UNDER THE NAME OF THE SOURCE that published them.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Criterion<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 304<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 316<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 904L<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Nitronic 50<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 303<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Difference<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Chromium (Cr)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">17.5-19.5%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">16.0-18.0%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">19.0-23.0%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">20.5-23.5%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">17.0-19.0%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Nitronic 50 and 904L carry the highest chromium bands.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Molybdenum (Mo)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">none<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">2.00-3.00%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">4.00-5.00%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.50-3.00%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">none (optional \u22640.60%)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">The molybdenum of 904L is about twice that of 316; this is the main source of its pitting resistance.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Nitrogen (N)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u22640.10%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u22640.10%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u22640.10%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">0.20-0.40%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">not specified<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">In Nitronic 50 nitrogen raises BOTH strength AND pitting resistance; in the others nitrogen is a ceiling, not a deliberate addition.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Copper (Cu)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">not specified<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">not specified<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.00-2.00%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">not specified<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">\u22641.00% (AMS 5640)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Copper is a deliberate addition only in 904L and is the reason for its resistance to reducing acids (sulphuric, phosphoric).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Sulphur (S)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u22640.030%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u22640.030%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u22640.035%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u22640.030%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">0.15% MINIMUM (ASTM A582)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">The sulphur of 303 is more than FIVE TIMES the ceiling of the others \u2014 it is the cause of both the machinability and the corrosion weakness.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Published PREN value<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">19 (Langley Alloys)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">25 (Langley Alloys, for 316L)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">35 (ISSF\/worldstainless)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">no single published value found<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">no single published value found<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">The PREN values were published by separate organizations and were not measured in one table; they are used for ranking, not for calculation. NO CALCULATION WAS PERFORMED.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:8px 12px 0;font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">C \u00b7 CREVICE CORROSION \u2014 ONE LABORATORY, ONE TEST (Sandmeyer Steel)<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:2px 12px 0;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.6;\">Critical crevice corrosion temperature in 10% ferric chloride solution. It is the table of a SINGLE organization, so no separate &#8216;corrosion&#8217; diagram was made; it is given inside the comparison under the source name. Nitronic 50 and 303 are NOT in this table.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Criterion<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 304<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 316<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 904L<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Nitronic 50<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 303<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Difference<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Critical crevice corrosion temperature, 10% FeCl3<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">not in the table<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">-2 \u00b0C (316L)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">20 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">not in the table<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">not in the table<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">In the same test 904L is 22 \u00b0C above 316L. For reference the table gives 317L 2 \u00b0C and 6Mo (N08367) 35 \u00b0C.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:8px 12px 0;font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">D \u00b7 SERVICE CLASS \u2014 qualitative, not numerical<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:2px 12px 0;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.6;\">This block is not a laboratory table; it is the common statement of manufacturer technical bulletins.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Criterion<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 304<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 316<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 904L<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Nitronic 50<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 303<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Difference<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Can it be welded?<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Yes<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Yes<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Yes (no preheat, post-weld treatment usually not required)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Yes<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NO \u2014 not recommended<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">303 is the ONLY grade among these five that is not welded.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Seawater \/ chloride service<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Not suitable<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Limited in warm seawater<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Suitable (ISSF: a PRE of 35 gives good resistance to warm seawater)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Suitable (Rolled Alloys: seawater applications, better resistance than 317L)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Not suitable \u2014 pitting<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">904L and Nitronic 50 are in the seawater class; 303 and 304 are not.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">How is strength raised?<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Cold work<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Cold work<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Cold work<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Nitrogen + cold or warm work<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Cold work<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">ALL FIVE ARE AUSTENITIC AND NONE OF THEM IS PRECIPITATION HARDENABLE. None has an ageing step.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:10px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:6px 0 6px;\">Additional information<\/div>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Compared with<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">AISI 303 (S30300 \u00b7 1.4305) \u2014 AISI 904L (N08904 \u00b7 1.4539) \u2014 Nitronic 50 (S20910 \u00b7 XM-19) \u2014 AISI 304 (S30400 \u00b7 1.4301) \u2014 AISI 316 (S31600 \u00b7 1.4401)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:6px 14px 12px;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.7;border-top:1px solid #f0f3f5;position:relative;z-index:2;\">RULE: every block is read from A SINGLE SOURCE TABLE. 303 IS ABSENT FROM BLOCK A because ASTM A479 is a pressure-vessel bar specification and does not cover free-machining grades; the base for 303 is A582, and A582 gives a hardness ceiling rather than tensile and yield minimums. This is not a measurement against 303 but a sign that 303 sits in A DIFFERENT CLASS. Every block is read from a single source table; the blocks are not summed. 303 does not appear in the strength block because it is not within ASTM A479. The PREN values are not calculated; they are quoted under the name of the source that published them. The crevice corrosion block is the table of a single organization and no separate corrosion diagram was made.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- \/dm-diy-kars --><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>One mechanism explains everything: the MnS inclusion.<\/b> The passive chromium oxide film is essentially as good as that of 304 \u2014 <b>but the metal beneath it is not the same<\/b>. Every sulphide inclusion is a discontinuity between film and matrix, and in chloride the pit starts <b>exactly there<\/b>: the inclusion dissolves, an acidic chloride-rich micro-environment forms inside, and the pit deepens <b>autocatalytically<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">Where it works well<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>Dry indoor environments.<\/b> Switchgear and panel components, instrument bodies, furniture and architectural interior hardware, internals of office and laboratory equipment.<br \/><b>Mildly corrosive atmospheres.<\/b> Urban indoor conditions, lubricated machine elements, gears, bushings, shafts, keys, set screws, lock cylinders.<br \/><b>Oil and grease contact.<\/b> An oil film keeps both chloride and oxygen away; 303 shafts and bushings run for decades in lubricated bearings.<br \/><b>Neutral, chloride-free internal volumes<\/b> \u2014 provided there is <b>no crevice geometry<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">Where it FAILS \u2014 this list is not negotiable<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>1. Seawater and marine atmosphere. FORBIDDEN.<\/b> The producer statement is explicit: <b>&#8220;not recommended for marine or similar environments.&#8221;<\/b> Even an outdoor application one kilometre from the coast is a risk for 303. Using 303 on a boat, a jetty or a coastal plant is <b>an invitation to pitting and stress corrosion cracking<\/b>.<br \/><b>2. Pitting and crevice corrosion in chloride-bearing aqueous media.<\/b> 303 pits <b>before 304<\/b> in the presence of chloride. Gaskets, interference fits, thread roots, blind holes, under-deposit and under-paint areas are all <b>crevice geometries<\/b>, and they are the weakest point of 303.<br \/><b>3. Chloride stress corrosion cracking (CLSCC).<\/b> The published threshold: susceptible <b>above ~50 \u00b0C<\/b> in chlorides \u2014 <b>lower<\/b> than the ~60 \u00b0C threshold normally quoted for the austenitic 18-8 family. An independent safety-authority report says it directly: <b>the free-machining grades (303, 303Se) show increased susceptibility to CLSCC because the sulphide inclusions act as nuclei for localised corrosion.<\/b> <b>Welded or cold-worked 303 is worse still<\/b> \u2014 the residual stress is already there.<br \/><b>4. Intergranular corrosion.<\/b> A producer table marks the intergranular corrosion resistance of 1.4305 as <b>NO in the as-delivered condition and NO in the as-welded condition<\/b>. Carbon up to 0.15 % and any pass through the <b>425\u2013860 \u00b0C<\/b> band produce it.<br \/><b>5. Transverse sections and end faces.<\/b> Because the inclusions are aligned with the rolling direction, <b>the end face of a bar is more vulnerable than its cylindrical surface<\/b>. The most attacked area of a 303 part is often <b>the faced end or the cut surface<\/b> \u2014 and this appears in field reports again and again as &#8220;unexpected&#8221;. It is not unexpected.<br \/><b>6. Hygienic \/ food \/ pharmaceutical lines.<\/b> Cleanability and chloride-bearing CIP chemicals make 303 unsuitable.<br \/><b>7. High temperature followed by aqueous service.<\/b> Every hour spent in the 425\u2013860 \u00b0C band lowers the corrosion resistance available later.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">PREN \u2014 and Why It Misleads for 303<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">The calculation<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">PREN = %Cr + 3.3 \u00d7 %Mo + 16 \u00d7 %N. 303 has no molybdenum and low nitrogen; published values fall between <b>~17 and ~21<\/b> (one mill publishes <b>19<\/b>, another gives a band of <b>17.0\u201320.7<\/b>)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Compared with 304<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Published PREN for 304 is <b>18\u201320<\/b>. <b>So if you look at PREN, 303 and 304 appear almost identical<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>And that is exactly wrong<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>The PREN formula cannot see inclusions.<\/b> It counts only dissolved Cr, Mo and N. The real weakness of 303 is not in the chemistry but in the <b>microstructure<\/b>. <b>Any offer that defends 303 on PREN grounds should not be taken seriously.<\/b> PREN is a comparison tool between inclusion-clean grades \u2014 <b>not between a free-machining grade and a standard one<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>The right criterion<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">The real decision criterion is the <b>critical pitting temperature (CPT)<\/b> and field experience. <b>No published CPT value for 303 could be found<\/b> \u2014 and that is no accident; CPT measurement on an inclusion-controlled material scatters widely<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b11\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Honest Comparison \u2014 303 or Something Else<\/h4>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">When to Use Which<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>303<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Choose it for:<\/b> high-volume screw-machine parts, dry or lubricated indoor service, no welding, no forming, no chloride. <b>Do not choose it for:<\/b> welding, marine, chlorides, hygiene, pressure code, cold forming<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-304\/\">304<\/a><\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>The default austenitic.<\/b> It welds, it forms, it is code-covered, and its corrosion resistance is clearly better. <b>The price: machinability roughly halves<\/b> and work hardening must be managed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-304l\/\">304L<\/a><\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">The low-carbon version of 304 for parts that are welded and will not be re-annealed. <b>It removes the sensitization risk<\/b> and gives up about <b>35 MPa<\/b> of yield strength in exchange<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-316\/\">316<\/a> \/ <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-316l\/\">316L<\/a><\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>If chloride is present, this is the right answer.<\/b> 2\u20133 % molybdenum lifts pitting and crevice resistance a class. <b>Machinability is less than half that of 303<\/b> \u2014 part cost rises, failure cost falls<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-430f\/\">430F<\/a><\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>The ferritic free-machining grade.<\/b> Its machinability competes with 303 and it is <b>distinctly cheaper<\/b> (no nickel). <b>But it is magnetic<\/b>, its corrosion resistance is below even 303, and it is brittle at low temperature. <b>Indoors, dry, and where magnetism is acceptable, it is a serious cost alternative<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-430\/\">430<\/a><\/b> \u00b7 416<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">430: non-free-machining ferritic, cheaper than 303, machines worse, welds poorly. 416: martensitic free-machining, <b>54\u201375 %<\/b>, <b>hardenable<\/b> (303 is not), but magnetic and below 303 in corrosion resistance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/17-4ph-1-4542-aisi-630\/\">17-4 PH<\/a><\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>When you need both strength and corrosion resistance.<\/b> Precipitation hardening gives over 1000 MPa yield and far better corrosion resistance than 303. <b>Machinability is around 45 %<\/b> and the price class is different<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Improved-machinability 304<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Very often this is the answer people are actually looking for.<\/b> Sulphur is not at free-machining level; it welds, it forms, it corrodes like 304, and it <b>machines clearly faster than standard 304<\/b>. <b>It does not reach 303 speeds.<\/b> It is ordered by mill brand name<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b12\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">Is the difference between 303 and 304 only machinability? Our parts run dry \u2014 should we buy 303?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>The difference is not only machinability, but in the conditions you describe 303 may well be the right choice.<\/b> Let us make the distinction clean.<br \/>On chemistry the two look like siblings: both are <b>17\u201319 % chromium, 8\u201310 % nickel<\/b>. The divergence is <b>sulphur<\/b>: ASTM imposes a <b>0.15 % minimum<\/b> on 303, while in 304 sulphur is an impurity capped at <b>0.030 % maximum<\/b> \u2014 <b>at least a five-fold difference<\/b>, in practice often ten-fold. That sulphur sits in the steel as <b>manganese sulphide inclusions<\/b> which break the chip and lubricate the tool. The machinability rating rises from <b>40\u201345 % to 69\u201378 %<\/b>, roughly <b>1.7\u20131.8 times<\/b>. On a high-volume turned part that is a genuine cost difference.<br \/>The price comes in three items. <b>First, corrosion:<\/b> those same inclusions are <b>pit initiation sites<\/b> in chloride; 303 is <b>not recommended<\/b> for marine and similar environments and is <b>susceptible to stress corrosion cracking above ~50 \u00b0C<\/b> in chlorides. <b>Second, welding:<\/b> 303 is effectively unweldable. <b>Third, forming:<\/b> it is unsuitable for cold bending, heading and deep drawing.<br \/><b>The decision rule for your case:<\/b> if the part runs in a <b>dry or lubricated indoor environment<\/b>, will <b>not be welded<\/b>, will <b>not be cold formed<\/b> and will <b>not see chloride<\/b>, then 303 is the correct and economical choice \u2014 gears, bushings, shafts, set screws and panel hardware fit that description exactly. If <b>even one<\/b> of those four conditions fails, the machining time you gain is <b>smaller than the cost of one field failure<\/b>. <b>And there is a middle path:<\/b> improved-machinability 304 variants machine <b>clearly faster than standard 304<\/b> without reaching 303 speeds, and they weld like 304 and corrode like 304.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">Our supplier says they can TIG weld 303 parts. Can it actually be done?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>Physically the arc strikes and a bead forms. As engineering, that is not a weld \u2014 it is a planned crack.<\/b><br \/>The mechanism: sulphur and phosphorus form <b>very low melting point liquid films<\/b> in the molten pool. As solidification advances these films are <b>pushed to the grain boundaries<\/b>, and as the bead cools the shrinkage stress opens exactly those liquid films. The result is <b>hot cracking<\/b> \u2014 often invisible to the eye, found by dye penetrant or radiography, and sometimes only in the field. In 303 these two elements are <b>not impurities but a specification requirement<\/b>; we are not talking about accidental contamination but about <b>the definition of the material<\/b>.<br \/>The institutional side is equally clear: a national welding standard <b>does not pre-qualify welding of 303<\/b>. You cannot claim &#8220;welded to a standard procedure&#8221;; <b>each joint needs separate qualification<\/b>, and passing is not guaranteed. A European mill marks intergranular corrosion resistance for 1.4305 as <b>NO as delivered, NO as welded<\/b>.<br \/><b>If it really is unavoidable<\/b>, the way to limit damage is to create <b>\u03b4-ferrite<\/b> in the weld metal: ferrite dissolves sulphur and phosphorus far better than austenite and interrupts the crack path. That is why the recommendations point to <b>high-ferrite fillers<\/b> \u2014 <b>E312<\/b> gives the most ferrite, <b>309<\/b> sits between, <b>308L<\/b> gives the least. <b>Autogenous (no filler) TIG must not be used<\/b>, because then the pool is pure base-metal chemistry. Keep heat input low, beads small and interpass temperature cold. Post-weld solution annealing is needed for maximum corrosion resistance; <b>but in the producer&#8217;s own words the result still remains poor both mechanically and for corrosion<\/b>.<br \/><b>The correct commercial answer:<\/b> make the welded part from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-304\/\">304<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-304l\/\">304L<\/a>. The minutes lost on the machine come back from NDT, scrap and field failure.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">Our 303 attracts a magnet \u2014 did we get the wrong material?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>Almost certainly not, and this is physically expected behaviour.<\/b><br \/>303 is <b>fully austenitic<\/b> in the solution-annealed condition and effectively non-magnetic; published relative permeability values range from <b>~1.02<\/b> to <b>\u22641.3<\/b>. But austenite in 18-8 chemistry is <b>thermodynamically metastable<\/b>. Cold deformation \u2014 bar drawing, rolling, the turning operation itself, thread rolling, centre pressure \u2014 converts part of the austenite to <b>strain-induced martensite<\/b>. Martensite is <b>ferromagnetic<\/b>. So a cold-drawn 303 bar attracting a magnet lightly is <b>normal<\/b>, and <b>the machined surface itself<\/b> may be more magnetic than the bulk.<br \/>There are two practical consequences. <b>First:<\/b> &#8220;stainless does not attract a magnet&#8221; is not a material rule but a folk belief; for the 18-8 austenitics it is close to true <b>only in the annealed condition<\/b>. <b>Second:<\/b> if the buyer specification really contains a <b>magnetic permeability ceiling<\/b> (instrumentation, sensor proximity, medical imaging environments), that must be discussed <b>before<\/b> the order. The solution is then either <b>solution annealing the finished part<\/b> \u2014 which brings dimensional and surface risk \u2014 or moving to a <b>more stable austenitic grade<\/b> from the outset. <b>Remember:<\/b> this magnetism is <b>not a chemistry error but a trace of processing history<\/b>; a mill certificate verifies chemistry, not magnetic response.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">Shafts we machined from 303 bar pitted within two years. The certificate looked compliant. What happened?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>The certificate probably was compliant. The cause of failure was not chemistry but microstructure and geometry.<\/b><br \/>A mill certificate verifies <b>dissolved chemistry<\/b>: chromium, nickel, carbon, sulphur. The weakness of 303 is invisible in those rows, because the weakness is <b>the form the sulphur takes<\/b> \u2014 thousands of <b>manganese sulphide inclusions<\/b>. Each inclusion is a discontinuity beneath the passive film. When chloride loads that film, the pit starts <b>exactly at those inclusions<\/b>: the inclusion dissolves, the inside of the pit turns acidic and chloride-rich, and the pit deepens autocatalytically.<br \/><b>Look at two things.<\/b> <b>First, direction:<\/b> sulphide inclusions are strung out along the rolling direction, which is why corrosion resistance is <b>markedly lower in cross-section<\/b>. The <b>faced end, groove root and shoulder radius<\/b> of a machined shaft are usually attacked first. <b>Second, crevices:<\/b> bearing seats, o-ring grooves, interference fits, keyways and thread roots are all <b>crevice geometries<\/b>; inside a crevice oxygen is depleted and chloride concentrates, and 303 is at its weakest there.<br \/><b>Also ask:<\/b> where did the chloride come from? Very often the answer is not the process fluid but the <b>environment<\/b> \u2014 coastal atmosphere, road salt, condensation, wash water, moisture under insulation, or a cleaning agent used during assembly. If the temperature exceeds <b>~50 \u00b0C<\/b> and the part is stressed (a machined and torqued shaft is), then the risk on the table is not only pitting but <b>stress corrosion cracking<\/b>.<br \/><b>What to do:<\/b> if the same geometry will see chloride, change the material \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-316\/\">316<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-316l\/\">316L<\/a> move up a class in pitting and crevice resistance thanks to molybdenum. If the geometry cannot change, <b>seal the crevices<\/b> and <b>radius the sharp corners<\/b>. <b>What you must not do is ask the supplier for &#8220;a better 303&#8221;<\/b>: the corrosion limit of 303 is not a quality problem, it is <b>the definition of the grade<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">Common datasheet errors \u2014 check these before you order<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>1. Selling 303 with 304 corrosion data \u2014 the most common and most expensive error.<\/b> Many distributor pages print the chemistry of 303 and then copy <b>the 304 text<\/b> into the corrosion section: &#8220;excellent corrosion resistance&#8221;, &#8220;food industry&#8221;, &#8220;broad chemical resistance&#8221;. <b>That is not true.<\/b> The producer&#8217;s own wording: the resistance of 303 is <b>&#8220;significantly less than Grade 304 due to the sulphur addition&#8221;<\/b>. <b>Do not trust any 303 page whose corrosion paragraph was copied from 304.<\/b><br \/><b>2. Offers for &#8220;303 sheet \/ plate \/ pipe&#8221;.<\/b> There is <b>no sheet, plate, strip, pipe or tube product standard for S30300<\/b>; ASTM A240, A312, A213, A249 and EN 10088-2 do not include 1.4305. Such an offer is either the wrong grade or a product with no standard behind it.<br \/><b>3. Believing ASTM A582 places an UPPER limit on sulphur.<\/b> A582 sets only the <b>S \u22650.15 % minimum<\/b>; <b>there is no ceiling<\/b>. EN 10088-3 gives a <b>0.15\u20130.35 % band<\/b>. If you do not write a sulphur band into the order, <b>machine behaviour will vary from lot to lot<\/b>.<br \/><b>4. Forgetting phosphorus.<\/b> <b>ASTM \u22640.20 %<\/b> against <b>EN \u22640.045 %<\/b> \u2014 more than four times. An ASTM-compliant heat may fail 1.4305. If you want dual certification, write carbon and phosphorus into the order.<br \/><b>5. Printing mechanical values as if they were specification minima.<\/b> <b>ASTM A582 sets no tensile \/ yield \/ elongation minimum for S30300<\/b> \u2014 only <b>\u2264262 HBW<\/b>. The &#8220;tensile 650 MPa, yield 300 MPa&#8221; figures circulating on datasheets are <b>typical values<\/b>. The real minima come from the <b>EN 10088-3<\/b> route: <b>Rp0.2 \u2265190, Rm 500\u2013750, A \u226535 %<\/b>.<br \/><b>6. Publishing a single &#8220;303 strength&#8221;.<\/b> In cold-drawn bar <b>diameter governs<\/b>: at \u2300 \u226440 mm Rm is <b>~600\u2013950 MPa<\/b>, at \u2300 >63\u2013100 mm it is <b>~500\u2013750 MPa<\/b>. A strength figure given without diameter and delivery condition is meaningless.<br \/><b>7. Density and melting point conflicts.<\/b> Density is printed as both <b>7.9<\/b> and <b>8.03 g\/cm\u00b3<\/b>; melting as both a <b>1400\u20131450 \u00b0C<\/b> range and a single <b>~1455 \u00b0C<\/b> point. <b>Do not average them; state which source you used.<\/b><br \/><b>8. A unit error: &#8220;density 8.03 kg\/m\u00b3&#8221;<\/b> \u2014 the real value is <b>8030 kg\/m\u00b3<\/b>.<br \/><b>9. Column-shifted tables.<\/b> One widely circulated 303 PDF shows modulus of elasticity as <b>62 GPa<\/b>, sulphur as <b>\u22641 %<\/b> and tensile as <b>398 MPa<\/b>. All three are wrong: modulus is <b>~193 GPa<\/b>, sulphur <b>0.15\u20130.35 %<\/b>, annealed tensile <b>500\u2013750 MPa<\/b>.<br \/><b>10. Phosphorus printed as &#8220;0\u20130.4 %&#8221;<\/b> by one technical portal. <b>No standard allows this:<\/b> ASTM \u22640.20 %, EN \u22640.045 %.<br \/><b>11. The claim &#8220;303 can be hardened by heat treatment&#8221;.<\/b> <b>False.<\/b> It is fully austenitic; hardness comes only from <b>cold deformation<\/b>. There is no quench-and-temper recipe.<br \/><b>12. Confusing ISO 3506 class A1 with A2.<\/b> 303 fasteners fall in <b>A1<\/b>, and the standard flags A1 as the <b>low-corrosion-resistance free-machining class<\/b>; <b>A2<\/b> is 304-based. Buying A1 bolts for outdoor or wet service is <b>a direct specification error<\/b>.<br \/><b>13. Presenting 303Se as &#8220;303 with the corrosion problem solved&#8221;.<\/b> <b>False.<\/b> Selenide inclusions improve <b>surface finish and some formability<\/b>; <b>the corrosion disadvantage remains<\/b>. It is also effectively unavailable in Europe.<br \/><b>14. Publishing an ASME P number for 303.<\/b> <b>Unverified, and it should not be published.<\/b> 303 is not a WPS basis; there is no allowable stress in any code requiring a pressure boundary.<br \/><b>15. Defending 303 with PREN.<\/b> The PREN values of 303 and 304 are numerically close (<b>~17\u201321<\/b>). <b>The PREN formula cannot see inclusions<\/b>; the real weakness of 303 is in the microstructure. <b>A 303 offer resting on PREN cannot be defended technically.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/dm-zengin --><\/p>\n<div class=\"dm-benzer\" style=\"margin:22px 0 0;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #e0e0e0;background:#FBFCFD;\">\n<p style=\"font-size:11px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.08em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#9aa3a8;margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.4;\">Related grades<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;font-size:15px;line-height:2;color:#333;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-304\/\" style=\"color:#24BEE5;font-weight:600;text-decoration:none;\">AISI 304<\/a> &nbsp;\u00b7&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-304l\/\" style=\"color:#24BEE5;font-weight:600;text-decoration:none;\">AISI 304L<\/a> &nbsp;\u00b7&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-310\/\" style=\"color:#24BEE5;font-weight:600;text-decoration:none;\">AISI 310<\/a> &nbsp;\u00b7&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/\" style=\"color:#24BEE5;font-weight:600;text-decoration:none;\">AISI 314<\/a> &nbsp;\u00b7&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/austenitic-steels\/\" style=\"color:#666;font-weight:600;text-decoration:none;\">Austenitic steels \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- dm-ld --><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"name\":\"AISI 303\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-303\/\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"description\":\"AISI 303 (UNS S30300 \/ W.Nr. 1.4305 \/ EN name X8CrNiS18-9) is the free-machining derivative of the 18-8 austenitic family. The base chemistry follows the same logic as 304 \u2014 nominally 17\u201319 % Cr and 8\u201310 % Ni \u2014 but one deliberate addition changes everything: sulphur is imposed by ASTM as a 0.15 %\u2026\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"name\":\"Defence Metal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/\"},\"publisher\":{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"Defence Metal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/\"},\"mainEntity\":{\"@type\":\"DefinedTerm\",\"name\":\"AISI 303\",\"description\":\"AISI 303 (UNS S30300 \/ W.Nr. 1.4305 \/ EN name X8CrNiS18-9) is the free-machining derivative of the 18-8 austenitic family. The base chemistry follows the same logic as 304 \u2014 nominally 17\u201319 % Cr and 8\u201310 % Ni \u2014 but one deliberate addition changes everything: sulphur is imposed by ASTM as a 0.15 %\u2026\",\"inDefinedTermSet\":{\"@type\":\"DefinedTermSet\",\"name\":\"Defence Metal - metals and alloys\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/\"},\"alternateName\":[\"UNS S30300\",\"W.Nr. 1.4305\",\"X8CrNiS18-9\"],\"identifier\":[{\"@type\":\"PropertyValue\",\"propertyID\":\"UNS\",\"value\":\"S30300\"},{\"@type\":\"PropertyValue\",\"propertyID\":\"Werkstoffnummer\",\"value\":\"1.4305\"}],\"additionalProperty\":[{\"@type\":\"PropertyValue\",\"name\":\"DIN \/ EN designation\",\"value\":\"X8CrNiS18-9\"}]}}<\/script><!-- \/dm-ld --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AISI 303 \/ (1.4305) \/ UNS S30300 \/ AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638 DEFENCE METAL AISI 303 UNS S30300 \u00b7 W.Nr. 1.4305 \u00b7 X8CrNiS18-9 \u00b7 BS 303S31 \/ EN 58M \u00b7 17.0-19.0% Cr \u2013 8.0-10.0% Ni \u2013 S 0.15% min (ASTM A582) or 0.15-0.35% (EN 1.4305) \u2013 C \u2264 0.15% (ASTM A582) or \u2264 0.10% &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-303\/\" class=\"more-link\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;AISI 303 \/ (1.4305)&#8221;<\/span>devam\u0131n\u0131 oku<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":3526,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_yoast_wpseo_title":"AISI 303 \/ (1.4305) \/ UNS S30300 \/ AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638 | Defence Metal","_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":"AISI 303 (UNS S30300, 1.4305) \u2014 AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638. Free-machining austenitic stainless steel, the most machinable of the austenitics.","inspiro_hide_title":false,"inspiro_hide_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"dm_sektor":[10,13,18,14,15],"class_list":["post-3671","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>AISI 303 \/ (1.4305) \/ UNS S30300 \/ AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638 | Defence Metal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"AISI 303 (UNS S30300, 1.4305) \u2014 AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638. Free-machining austenitic stainless steel, the most machinable of the austenitics.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-303\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AISI 303 \/ (1.4305) \/ UNS S30300 \/ AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638 | Defence Metal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"AISI 303 (UNS S30300, 1.4305) \u2014 AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638. Free-machining austenitic stainless steel, the most machinable of the austenitics.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-303\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defence Metal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-25T18:15:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"45 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/index.php\\\/en\\\/aisi-303\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/index.php\\\/en\\\/aisi-303\\\/\",\"name\":\"AISI 303 \\\/ (1.4305) \\\/ UNS S30300 \\\/ AMS 5635 \\\/ AMS 5638 | Defence Metal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-16T08:17:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-25T18:15:37+00:00\",\"description\":\"AISI 303 (UNS S30300, 1.4305) \u2014 AMS 5635 \\\/ AMS 5638. Free-machining austenitic stainless steel, the most machinable of the austenitics.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/index.php\\\/en\\\/aisi-303\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/index.php\\\/en\\\/aisi-303\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/index.php\\\/en\\\/aisi-303\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Anasayfa\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/index.php\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"AISI 303 \\\/ (1.4305)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Defence Metal\",\"description\":\"for better produce !\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Defence Metal\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/cropped-logopngson.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/cropped-logopngson.png\",\"width\":3846,\"height\":649,\"caption\":\"Defence Metal\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/defencemetal\"],\"description\":\"Havac\u0131l\u0131k, savunma, enerji ve makine sekt\u00f6rleri i\u00e7in paslanmaz \u00e7elik, nikel ala\u015f\u0131mlar\u0131, titanyum, al\u00fcminyum ve ala\u015f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00e7elik tedarik eden \u00f6zel ala\u015f\u0131m tedarik\u00e7isi.\",\"email\":\"info@defencemetal.com\",\"telephone\":\"+90 216 709 74 41\",\"legalName\":\"Defence Metal\",\"address\":{\"@type\":\"PostalAddress\",\"streetAddress\":\"Cevizli Mah. Mustafa Kemal Cad. Hukuk\u00e7ular Towers A Blok No:66A \u0130\u00e7 Kap\u0131 No:111\",\"addressLocality\":\"Kartal\",\"addressRegion\":\"\u0130stanbul\",\"postalCode\":\"34865\",\"addressCountry\":\"TR\"},\"contactPoint\":{\"@type\":\"ContactPoint\",\"contactType\":\"sales\",\"telephone\":\"+90 216 709 74 41\",\"email\":\"info@defencemetal.com\",\"areaServed\":\"TR\",\"availableLanguage\":[\"Turkish\",\"English\"]}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AISI 303 \/ (1.4305) \/ UNS S30300 \/ AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638 | Defence Metal","description":"AISI 303 (UNS S30300, 1.4305) \u2014 AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638. Free-machining austenitic stainless steel, the most machinable of the austenitics.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-303\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"AISI 303 \/ (1.4305) \/ UNS S30300 \/ AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638 | Defence Metal","og_description":"AISI 303 (UNS S30300, 1.4305) \u2014 AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638. Free-machining austenitic stainless steel, the most machinable of the austenitics.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-303\/","og_site_name":"Defence Metal","article_modified_time":"2026-09-25T18:15:37+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"45 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-303\/","url":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-303\/","name":"AISI 303 \/ (1.4305) \/ UNS S30300 \/ AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638 | Defence Metal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-09-16T08:17:08+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-25T18:15:37+00:00","description":"AISI 303 (UNS S30300, 1.4305) \u2014 AMS 5635 \/ AMS 5638. Free-machining austenitic stainless steel, the most machinable of the austenitics.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-303\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-303\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-303\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Anasayfa","item":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"AISI 303 \/ (1.4305)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/","name":"Defence Metal","description":"for better produce !","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/#organization","name":"Defence Metal","url":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/cropped-logopngson.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/cropped-logopngson.png","width":3846,"height":649,"caption":"Defence Metal"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/defencemetal"],"description":"Havac\u0131l\u0131k, savunma, enerji ve makine sekt\u00f6rleri i\u00e7in paslanmaz \u00e7elik, nikel ala\u015f\u0131mlar\u0131, titanyum, al\u00fcminyum ve ala\u015f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00e7elik tedarik eden \u00f6zel ala\u015f\u0131m tedarik\u00e7isi.","email":"info@defencemetal.com","telephone":"+90 216 709 74 41","legalName":"Defence Metal","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","streetAddress":"Cevizli Mah. Mustafa Kemal Cad. Hukuk\u00e7ular Towers A Blok No:66A \u0130\u00e7 Kap\u0131 No:111","addressLocality":"Kartal","addressRegion":"\u0130stanbul","postalCode":"34865","addressCountry":"TR"},"contactPoint":{"@type":"ContactPoint","contactType":"sales","telephone":"+90 216 709 74 41","email":"info@defencemetal.com","areaServed":"TR","availableLanguage":["Turkish","English"]}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3671"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3671\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6288,"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3671\/revisions\/6288"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3526"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"dm_sektor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/dm_sektor?post=3671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}