{"id":3655,"date":"2026-09-16T11:14:31","date_gmt":"2026-09-16T08:14:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/"},"modified":"2026-09-25T21:15:27","modified_gmt":"2026-09-25T18:15:27","slug":"aisi-314","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/","title":{"rendered":"AISI 314 \/ (1.4841)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- dm-hap --><\/p>\n<h1 class=\"dm-ust-baslik\" style=\"font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif !important;text-transform:none !important;font-size:27px;line-height:1.3;font-weight:800;color:#12303f;margin:0 0 10px;letter-spacing:-.01em;\">AISI 314 \/ (1.4841) \/ AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652<\/h1>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:0 0 22px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"background:#12303f;padding:14px 16px 12px;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:22px;font-weight:700;color:#fff;line-height:1.25;\">AISI 314<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-family:ui-monospace,Menlo,Consolas,monospace;font-size:12.5px;color:#b9cfdb;line-height:1.5;margin-top:5px;word-wrap:break-word;\">UNS S31400 \u00b7 W.Nr. 1.4841 \u00b7 X15CrNiSi25-21 \u00b7 the ASTM A276 band: C \u2264 0.25%, Mn \u2264 2.00%, P \u2264 0.045%, S \u2264 0.030%, Si 1.50-3.00%, Cr 23.00-26.00%, Ni 19.00-22.00%. The EN 1.4841 band: C \u2264 0.20%, Si 1.50-2.50%, Mn \u2264 2.00%, P \u2264 0.045%, S \u2264 0.015%, Cr 24.0-26.0%, Ni 19.0-22.0%, N \u2264 0.11%. THE TWO BANDS ARE NOT THE SAME: the ASTM silicon ceiling is 3.00% and the EN one 2.50%; the ASTM carbon ceiling is 0.25% and the EN one 0.20%; the ASTM lower chromium limit is 23.00% and the EN one 24.0%. One heat may not satisfy both, and S31400 and 1.4841 do not automatically stand in for one another. What defines 314 is THAT THE SILICON HAS A LOWER LIMIT: a minimum of 1.50% is required, so the silicon ceiling of 310 is the silicon floor of 314. It is an austenitic stainless steel: NOT PRECIPITATION HARDENABLE.<\/p>\n<div data-dmkars-blok=\"1\" style=\"border-top:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,.16);margin-top:13px;padding-top:11px;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:10px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#7f9fb0;font-weight:700;margin-bottom:8px;\">Not to be confused with<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/2026\/09\/25\/aisi-310-aisi-314-difference\/\" data-dmkars=\"1\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:4px 11px;border:1px solid rgba(36,190,229,.45);background:rgba(36,190,229,.12);border-radius:99px;margin:0 6px 6px 0;font-size:12.5px;font-weight:600;color:#9fe2f7;text-decoration:none;\">AISI 310<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\n<div style=\"flex:0 0 118px;padding:11px 14px;background:#F7FAFB;font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b8091;font-weight:600;line-height:1.5;\">For what<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex:1 1 230px;min-width:0;padding:11px 14px;font-size:14.5px;line-height:1.7;color:#3d5260;word-wrap:break-word;overflow-wrap:break-word;\">Bought when resistance to scaling in air is wanted at a temperature where 310 is not enough: radiant tubes, furnace internals and enclosures, heat-treatment baskets and fixtures, annealing and carburizing boxes.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\n<div style=\"flex:0 0 118px;padding:11px 14px;background:#F7FAFB;font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b8091;font-weight:600;line-height:1.5;\">Forms<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex:1 1 230px;min-width:0;padding:11px 14px;font-size:14.5px;line-height:1.7;color:#3d5260;word-wrap:break-word;overflow-wrap:break-word;\">Round bar \u00b7 flat bar \u00b7 plate \u00b7 sheet \u00b7 pipe \u00b7 forging \u00b7 wire. All forms are supplied to order. NOTE: as set out in the standards note below, there is NO ASTM equivalent for 314 on the plate, sheet, pipe and tube side; those forms are ordered to EN 10095 \/ 1.4841 or to AMS 5522.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\n<div style=\"flex:0 0 118px;padding:11px 14px;background:#F7FAFB;font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b8091;font-weight:600;line-height:1.5;\">Standards<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex:1 1 230px;min-width:0;padding:11px 14px;font-size:14.5px;line-height:1.7;color:#3d5260;word-wrap:break-word;overflow-wrap:break-word;\">AMS: 5522 (sheet, strip and plate \u2014 the SAE title reads &#8217;25Cr-20Ni-2.0Si (314), Solution Heat Treated&#8217;) \u00b7 5652 (bars, forgings and rings \u2014 the SAE title reads &#8217;25Cr-20Ni-2Si&#8217;). ASTM: A276 (bars and shapes) \u00b7 A314 (billets and bars for forging) \u00b7 A473 (forgings) \u00b7 A580 (wire). THERE IS NO OTHER ASTM SPECIFICATION. EN: 1.4841 \u00b7 EN 10095 (heat resisting steels) \u2014 this is the governing standard for plate, sheet, bar and tube. Others: JIS SUH 310 (approximate equivalent) \u00b7 BS 314S25 \u00b7 UNI X16CrNiSi25-20.<br \/><span style=\"font-size:12.5px;color:#7b8f9b;line-height:1.6;display:inline-block;margin-top:6px;\">THE MOST IMPORTANT NOTE \u2014 THE ASTM SCOPE OF 314 EXISTS ONLY ON THE BAR AND FORGING SIDE. The SSINA handbook lists only four ASTM numbers for S31400: A276, A314, A473, A580.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\n<div style=\"flex:0 0 118px;padding:11px 14px;background:#F7FAFB;font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b8091;font-weight:600;line-height:1.5;\">Advantage<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex:1 1 230px;min-width:0;padding:11px 14px;font-size:14.5px;line-height:1.7;color:#3d5260;word-wrap:break-word;overflow-wrap:break-word;\">+100 \u00b0C in air. In ONE AND THE SAME EN 10095 table the maximum service temperature in air is 1150 \u00b0C for 1.4841 and 1050 \u00b0C for 1.4845 (310S).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\n<div style=\"flex:0 0 118px;padding:11px 14px;background:#F7FAFB;font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b8091;font-weight:600;line-height:1.5;\">Welding<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex:1 1 230px;min-width:0;padding:11px 14px;font-size:14.5px;line-height:1.7;color:#3d5260;word-wrap:break-word;overflow-wrap:break-word;\">Filler metal, preheat and post-weld treatment information SPECIFIC to 314 could not be confirmed by four independent sources, and for that reason no numbers are given.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\n<div style=\"flex:0 0 118px;padding:11px 14px;background:#fdeceb;font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#c0392b;font-weight:600;line-height:1.5;\">Limits<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex:1 1 230px;min-width:0;padding:11px 14px;font-size:14.5px;line-height:1.7;color:#3d5260;word-wrap:break-word;overflow-wrap:break-word;background:#fdeceb;\">1) SULPHUR-BEARING ATMOSPHERES \u2014 THIS IS THE HARDEST LIMIT. AGST: resistance to oxidising and reducing sulphurous gases holds up to about 650 \u00b0C. thyssenkrupp: &#8216;the resistance to oxidising and reductive sulphurous gases is low.&#8217; Virgamet: at high sulphur concentrations the heat resistance drops to approximately 900 \u00b0C.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:14px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/contact\/\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:11px 20px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;text-decoration:none;margin:0 8px 6px 0;background:#dd3333;color:#ffffff;\">REQUEST A QUOTE<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/stainless-steel\/\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:11px 20px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;text-decoration:none;margin:0 8px 6px 0;font-weight:600;border:1px solid #12303f;color:#12303f;\">All stainless steels &rarr;<\/a><span data-dm=\"dm-teknik\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:11px 20px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;text-decoration:none;margin:0 8px 6px 0;border:1px solid #dd3333;color:#dd3333;\">TECHNICAL DETAILS &darr;<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:9px 14px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-size:11.5px;color:#8a9aa4;line-height:1.5;\">Compiled from manufacturer data sheets \u00b7 confirm against the current specification before ordering<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- \/dm-hap --><!-- dm-nav --><\/p>\n<style>h4[id^=\"dm-b\"]{scroll-margin-top:120px}#dm-teknik{scroll-margin-top:120px}<\/style>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:0 0 22px;padding:12px 14px;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:10.5px;letter-spacing:.09em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#6b8091;font-weight:600;margin-bottom:9px;\">On this page &middot; click to jump<\/div>\n<div><span data-dm=\"dm-b0\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">What AISI 314 Is<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b1\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Standards by Product Form<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b2\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">ASME Code Acceptance<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b3\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">MAXIMUM SERVICE TEMPERATURE<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b4\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Product Forms That Have NO Standard<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b5\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Chemical Composition<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b6\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Mechanical Properties<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b7\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Physical Properties<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b8\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Heat Treatment and Thermal Stability<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b9\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">SIGMA PHASE AND EMBRITTLEMENT<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b10\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Welding<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b11\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Machining<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b12\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Corrosion<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b13\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Honest Comparison<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b14\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/span><span data-dm=\"dm-b15\" style=\"cursor:pointer;display:inline-block;padding:5px 11px;border:1px solid #dfe6ea;background:#F7FAFB;margin:0 6px 7px 0;font-size:13px;color:#12303f;\">Common Datasheet Errors and Traps<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><script>(function(){function go(id){var e=document.getElementById(id);if(e){var s=document.scrollingElement||document.documentElement;var y=e.getBoundingClientRect().top+s.scrollTop-118;if(y-0-0-0-0!==y){y=0;}window.scrollTo(0,y);}}function bind(el){el.addEventListener(\"click\",function(ev){ev.preventDefault();go(el.getAttribute(\"data-dm\"));});}function init(){var l=document.querySelectorAll(\"[data-dm]\");Array.prototype.forEach.call(l,bind);if(location.hash){if(location.hash.indexOf(\"#dm-\")===0){try{history.replaceState(null,\"\",location.pathname+location.search);}catch(e){}window.scrollTo(0,0);setTimeout(function(){window.scrollTo(0,0);},80);}}}if(document.readyState===\"loading\"){document.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",init);}else{init();}})();<\/script><!-- \/dm-nav --><br \/>\n<span id=\"dm-teknik\" style=\"display:block;height:0;overflow:hidden;\"><\/span><br \/>\n<strong>Corrosion resistance:<\/strong> AISI 314 has very good corrosion resistance even at temperatures above 1000 \u00b0C.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Temperature capability:<\/strong> The maximum service temperature of the material is 1100 \u00b0C.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Weldability:<\/strong> The weldability of the material is good.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Machinability:<\/strong> The material is specially softened so that it machines well.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Heat treatment:<\/strong> AISI 314 stainless steel is an alloy optimised for high temperatures, so its heat treatment requirements are generally somewhat different. Heat treatment of this type of steel is usually carried out for purposes such as cold forming, softening or post-weld stress relief.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Applications:<\/strong> This stainless grade is very frequently used in the chemical industry and in the machinery industry. Beyond these it is used in various fixtures and tooling in the glass and glass manufacturing sector. It is frequently used in high temperature furnaces, in mining, in kilns and in boilers. Another application area is aluminium and bronze moulds. In short, it can be used almost anywhere that high temperatures are involved and good corrosion resistance is required.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Chemical Composition<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Max. 0.25<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Mn<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Max. 2.00<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Si<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Min. 1.50 \u00b7 Max. 3.00<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">P<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Max. 0.045<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">S<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Max. 0.03<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Cr<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Min. 23.00 \u00b7 Max. 26.00<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Ni<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Min. 19.00 \u00b7 Max. 22.00<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Mechanical Properties<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Tensile Strength (MPa)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">689<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Proof Stress (MPa)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">345<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Elongation A50 mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">40<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Hardness Brinell<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">163 Max HB<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Density<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">7.80 g\/cm3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Melting Point<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">1375 &#8211; 1450 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Modulus of Elasticity<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">200 GPa<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Electrical Resistivity<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">8.5E \u03a9.m<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Thermal Conductivity<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">17.5 W\/m.K<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">Thermal Expansion<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">15.1 x10^-6 \/K<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"dm-std\" style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Standards and Equivalents \u00b7 AISI 314<\/div>\n<div data-dmtw=\"1\" style=\"position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;overflow-x:auto;\">\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Trade name<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">AISI 314<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">W.Nr (DIN\/EN)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">1.4841 \u00b7 1.4845<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">AMS<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">5522 \u00b7 5652<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\">ASTM<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">A580 \u00b7 A276 \u00b7 A314 \u00b7 A473<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\">Available forms<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Round bar \u00b7 Flat bar \u00b7 Plate \u00b7 Sheet \u00b7 Tube \u00b7 Forgings<br \/><span style=\"font-size:13px;color:#6b7a84;\">All forms are supplied to order.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- dm-zengin --><\/p>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b0\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">What AISI 314 Is \u2014 What Silicon Buys, and What It Costs<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\">AISI 314 (UNS <b>S31400<\/b>, W.Nr. <b>1.4841<\/b>, EN name <b>X15CrNiSi25-21<\/b>, BS <b>314S25<\/b>, JIS <b>SUH310<\/b>) is the <b>highest-temperature<\/b> member of the austenitic heat-resisting family. Its chemistry is broadly that of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-310\/\">310<\/a> \u2014 <b>24\u201326 % chromium, 19\u201322 % nickel<\/b> \u2014 with <b>one element added: silicon at 1.5\u20132.5 % (up to 3.0 % in the ASTM band)<\/b>. Since typical 310 runs <b>0.5\u20130.6 % silicon<\/b>, that is a <b>three- to fivefold<\/b> increase.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>What silicon does, in one sentence:<\/b> it builds a thin, adherent <b>SiO\u2082 (silica) sub-layer beneath<\/b> the chromium oxide. That sub-layer is a <b>diffusion barrier<\/b>: it slows oxygen inward and chromium outward. The result is that <b>the scaling limit in air rises from \u22481050 \u00b0C to \u22481150 \u00b0C<\/b> \u2014 a gain of roughly <b>100 \u00b0C<\/b>. The same silica barrier also gives <b>some protection in carburizing gases<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>But the price is heavy and datasheets almost never print it.<\/b> Silicon is a <b>strong ferrite and sigma former<\/b>: <b>314&#8217;s sigma-embrittlement tendency is markedly higher than 310&#8217;s<\/b>. Silicon also <b>raises the hot-cracking risk on solidification<\/b>, <b>makes hot working harder<\/b> and <b>lowers machinability<\/b>. Add <b>almost no ASTM product forms<\/b> and <b>no ASME code status<\/b>, and 314 lands in a narrow but very clear place: <b>static, unwelded, non-pressure furnace parts running above 1050 \u00b0C<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">The real difference between 314 and 310 \u2014 item by item<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">314 vs 310S \u2014 Gains and Losses<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Silicon<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>314: 1.50\u20133.00 % (ASTM) \/ 1.50\u20132.50 % (EN)<\/b> \u00b7 <b>310S: \u22641.50 %, typically 0.5\u20130.6 %<\/b>. <b>This is the only real divergence<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Scaling limit in air<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>314: \u22481150 \u00b0C<\/b> \u00b7 <b>310S: \u22481050 \u00b0C<\/b>. This is the one figure that is <b>consistent across multiple independent European sources<\/b> and <b>the entire reason 314 exists<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Room-temperature strength<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">EN minima: <b>314 \u2192 Rp0.2 \u2265230 MPa, Rm 550\u2013750 MPa<\/b> \u00b7 <b>310S \u2192 Rp0.2 \u2265210 MPa, Rm 500\u2013700 MPa<\/b>. <b>314 is stronger<\/b>, but <b>its elongation requirement falls: 30 % (A5) versus 35 %<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Sigma tendency<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>314 is markedly worse.<\/b> Silicon accelerates sigma; European compilations explicitly note a <b>&#8220;higher embrittlement tendency&#8221;<\/b> for 1.4841. <b>This is 314&#8217;s most serious weakness<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Weldability<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>314 is worse.<\/b> The weld metal is fully austenitic (as in 310) <b>but silicon raises the hot-cracking risk further<\/b>. It is also <b>susceptible to intergranular corrosion in the as-welded condition<\/b> \u2014 with an ASTM carbon ceiling of <b>0.25 %<\/b> that is nearly certain<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Code and specification<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>310S: A240, A312, A213, A249, A358, A182, A403 plus the ASME SA- equivalents.<\/b> <b>314: in ASTM only A276, A314, A473 and A580<\/b> \u2014 that is <b>bar, forging billet, forgings and wire<\/b>. <b>No plate, no pipe, no tube, no flanges, no ASME code acceptance<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>The decision<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Below 1050 \u00b0C, or if the part will be welded, choose 310S.<\/b> <b>For a static, unwelded, unpressurised part between 1050 and 1150 \u00b0C, 314 makes sense<\/b> \u2014 but <b>verify the supply form first<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">WARNING: S31400 and 1.4841 are not the same alloy<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\">This is <b>the most common and most expensive error<\/b> about 314. The equation &#8220;314 = 1.4841&#8221; has become a reflex; some datasheets go so far as to head their page <b>&#8220;1.4841 = AISI 314 = UNS S31000\/S31400&#8221;<\/b>, which <b>compresses three different alloys into one line<\/b>. The real picture:<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Differences Between ASTM S31400 and EN 1.4841<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Chromium<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>ASTM S31400: 23.0\u201326.0 %<\/b> \u00b7 <b>EN 1.4841: 24.0\u201326.0 %<\/b>. <b>The ASTM floor is a full point lower<\/b> \u2014 a heat at 23.5 % meets S31400 and <b>fails 1.4841<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Silicon<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>ASTM: 1.50\u20133.00 %<\/b> \u00b7 <b>EN 1.4841: 1.50\u20132.50 %<\/b>. [CONFLICT] one European catalogue, citing EN 10088-3, gives <b>1.50\u20132.00 %<\/b>. <b>Three different upper limits circulate<\/b> for the element that <b>carries this alloy&#8217;s entire identity<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Carbon<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>ASTM: \u22640.25 %<\/b> \u00b7 <b>EN: \u22640.20 %<\/b>. In EN 10095 practice a <b>carbon MINIMUM (\u22480.10 %) is also cited<\/b> for 1.4841; the producer datasheets available here publish only the <b>\u22640.20 % ceiling<\/b>. <b>Verify the minimum-carbon requirement against the EN 10095 text before ordering<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Sulphur \u00b7 nitrogen<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>ASTM S \u22640.030 %<\/b> \u00b7 <b>EN S \u22640.015 %<\/b> \u2014 <b>EN is twice as tight<\/b>. And <b>EN caps N at 0.11 %<\/b> while the ASTM S31400 row has <b>no nitrogen limit<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Conclusion<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>&#8220;314 and 1.4841 are interchangeable&#8221; is false.<\/b> The chromium floor, the silicon ceiling, the carbon ceiling and the sulphur ceiling differ at <b>four separate points<\/b>. <b>If both standards are needed, ask for dual certification<\/b> and write the window <b>Cr \u226524.0 % \u00b7 Si 1.50\u20132.50 % \u00b7 C \u22640.20 % \u00b7 S \u22640.015 %<\/b> into the order<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">The neighbours<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Where 314 Sits<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-310\/\">310S \/ 310H<\/a><\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Its direct rival, and in most jobs the better answer.<\/b> In exchange for a scaling limit 100 \u00b0C lower it offers <b>a complete specification chain, ASME code acceptance, better weldability and less sigma tendency<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>253 MA class<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\u224821 % Cr \u2013 11 % Ni plus <b>Si \u22481.7 % \u00b7 N \u22480.17 % \u00b7 Ce \u22480.04 %<\/b>. <b>It uses the same silicon logic as 314 but adds cerium and nitrogen, improving both scale adhesion and creep.<\/b> It is ASME VIII Div. 1 approved to <b>1650 \u00b0F (899 \u00b0C)<\/b> \u2014 <b>something 314 has never had<\/b>. Oxidation resistance runs to <b>\u22481093 \u00b0C<\/b> and nitrogen&#8217;s austenite stabilisation <b>retards sigma formation<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>330 class (N08330)<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">\u224835 % Ni \u2013 19 % Cr \u2013 1.25 % Si. <b>Forms no sigma<\/b> and is best in class for thermal cycling and shock. Stress for 1 % creep in 10,000 h at 871 \u00b0C: <b>\u224814.5 MPa<\/b> versus <b>\u22487.6 MPa<\/b> for 310. <b>It is the right answer for carburizing atmospheres<\/b>, but the nickel makes it expensive<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/incoloy-800h\/\">Incoloy 800H<\/a><\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">\u224832 % Ni \u2013 21 % Cr \u2013 Fe, C 0.05\u20130.10 %, Al+Ti. <b>The reference for code coverage and published long-term data in the creep range<\/b>, and it exists in every product form 314 lacks. <b>For pressure-bearing high-temperature work this class is considered, not 314<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Cast equivalent<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>There is no such specification as &#8220;cast 314&#8221;.<\/b> The heat-resisting casting side is the <b>ACI H series<\/b> (for example <b>HK<\/b>, \u224825Cr\u201320Ni, ASTM <b>A297<\/b>; tubing <b>A351 Gr. HK40<\/b>). <b>These are not the same material as wrought 314:<\/b> carbon is far higher and the structure is cast. <b>Specify an H-series casting for valve bodies, hearth supports and reformer tubes<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b1\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Standards by Product Form<\/h4>\n<p><!-- dm-diy-std --><\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #e3e9ec;margin:22px 0 26px;background:#fff;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#12303f;color:#fff;padding:9px 14px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.3px;position:relative;z-index:2;\">STANDARDS BY PRODUCT FORM<\/div>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Product form<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Standards<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Plate<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\"><b style=\"font-size:16.5px;font-weight:800;color:#12303f;\">AMS 5522<\/b> (sheet, strip and plate; the SAE title reads &#8217;25Cr-20Ni-2.0Si (314), Solution Heat Treated&#8217;). THERE IS NO ASTM EQUIVALENT \u2014 S31400 could not be found in either of the two ASTM A240 texts searched. EN 10095 \/ 1.4841 is the governing standard.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Sheet<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\"><b style=\"font-size:16.5px;font-weight:800;color:#12303f;\">AMS 5522<\/b> (sheet, strip and plate). THERE IS NO ASTM EQUIVALENT. EN 10095 \/ 1.4841.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Round bar and flat bar<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\"><b style=\"font-size:16.5px;font-weight:800;color:#12303f;\">AMS 5652<\/b> (bars, forgings and rings). ASTM A276 (bars and shapes, S31400) \u00b7 ASTM A484 (general requirements) \u00b7 EN 10095 \/ 1.4841 \u00b7 EN 10088-3. NOTE: ASTM A479 (bar for boilers and pressure vessels) DOES NOT COVER S31400; 314 cannot be ordered to ASTM as pressure-vessel bar.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Wire<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">THERE IS NO SEPARATE AMS NUMBER FOR WIRE; <b style=\"font-size:16.5px;font-weight:800;color:#12303f;\">AMS 5652<\/b>, which covers bar, applies. ASTM A580 (wire, S31400) \u00b7 EN 10088-3.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Forging<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\"><b style=\"font-size:16.5px;font-weight:800;color:#12303f;\">AMS 5652<\/b> (bars, forgings and rings). ASTM A314 (billets and bars for forging, S31400) \u00b7 ASTM A473 (forgings, S31400) \u00b7 ASTM A484 \u00b7 EN 10095 \/ 1.4841 \u00b7 EN 10250-4. NOTE: ASTM A182 (F-class forged flanges and fittings) DOES NOT COVER S31400.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Pipe and tube<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">NO AMS EQUIVALENT COULD BE CONFIRMED. THERE IS NO ASTM EQUIVALENT \u2014 TP314 could not be found in the ASTM A312 or A213 texts. EN 10095 \/ 1.4841 is the governing standard; dimensions and delivery conditions are settled with the supplier by contract.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Flange and fitting<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NO AMS EQUIVALENT COULD BE CONFIRMED. ASTM A182 DOES NOT COVER S31400; there is no ASTM equivalent for 314 in these forms. A forging may be bought to ASTM A473 \/ A314 and machined to the dimensions of ASME B16.5 \/ B16.9, but that is not a MATERIAL specification match and must be settled before the order.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:6px 14px 12px;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.7;border-top:1px solid #f0f3f5;position:relative;z-index:2;\">314 DOES HAVE AMS NUMBERS: 5522 (sheet\/strip\/plate) and 5652 (bar\/forging\/ring). The SAE title of AMS 5522 says &#8216;(314)&#8217; directly. THE ASTM SCOPE OF 314 IS FOUR NUMBERS ONLY: A276, A314, A473, A580 (the SSINA handbook). All of them are on the bar, billet, forging and wire side. THERE IS NO ASTM EQUIVALENT FOR PLATE, SHEET, PIPE AND TUBE. This is confirmed against the primary texts searched: S31400 is absent from ASTM A240 (two separate texts) and from A479; TP314 is absent from ASTM A312 and A213. ASTM A182 does not cover S31400; there is no ASTM material specification for 314 in flanges and fittings. The numbers AMS 5521 and AMS 5651 DO NOT BELONG to 314; they are 310\/310S numbers. AMS 7490, which SSINA lists, was found in only one source and has NOT been put on the map. EN 10095 \/ 1.4841 is the only complete standard for most of the product forms of 314; for that reason the EN rows here are not for information but GOVERNING.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- \/dm-diy-std --><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>For 314 this section is not a show of strength, as it is for 310, but a warning list.<\/b> On the ASTM side S31400 appears only in <b>bar and bar-derived<\/b> specifications. On the European side the situation reverses: <b>EN 10095 covers 1.4841 as sheet, plate, strip and bar<\/b>. So <b>314 plate exists \u2014 but as &#8220;EN 10095 1.4841 plate&#8221;, not as &#8220;ASTM 314 plate&#8221;<\/b>. That single sentence rescues procurement on many projects.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Standards by Product Form \u00b7 AISI 314 \/ 1.4841<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Bar \u00b7 rod \u00b7 shapes<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">ASTM <b>A276<\/b> (stainless bars and shapes) \u2014 <b>S31400&#8217;s principal ASTM home<\/b>. Europe: <b>EN 10095<\/b> and <b>EN 10088-3<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Billets and bars for forging<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">ASTM <b>A314<\/b> \u2014 <b>a semi-finished specification<\/b>, not a finished-part specification. Forgings: ASTM <b>A473<\/b>; wire: ASTM <b>A580<\/b>. <b>There is no A182 pressure-flange equivalent<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Sheet \u00b7 plate \u00b7 strip<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>ABSENT on the ASTM side.<\/b> On the European side <b>EN 10095<\/b> (heat-resisting steels) covers 1.4841. <b>Order plate through EN 10095 \/ 1.4841<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Pipe and tube<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>ABSENT on the ASTM side<\/b> \u2014 S31400 does not appear in A312, A213, A249, A358 or A409. On the European side some producers offer 1.4841 tube under <b>EN 10216-5<\/b> and <b>EN 10297-2<\/b>. [SINGLE SOURCE] <b>Get written confirmation of that scope before ordering<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Welding consumables<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>There is NO &#8220;ER314&#8221; classification in AWS A5.9.<\/b> In practice <b>ER310<\/b> is used (or W.Nr. <b>1.4842<\/b> filler in Europe). <b>The consequence matters: the weld metal contains LESS silicon than the base metal<\/b>, so <b>the seam is the weak link in scale resistance<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>ASME Section IX<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">The base metal sits in <b>P-No. 8<\/b>; <b>verify the group number against the current edition<\/b>. <b>A P-No. assignment does NOT mean the material may be used in pressure equipment<\/b> \u2014 for that it needs a stress value in Section II Part D<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b2\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">ASME Code Acceptance \u2014 Short Answer: There Is None<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>This section starts with a one-line fact:<\/b> in the sources available here, <b>no ASME SA-prefixed material specification exists for S31400<\/b>. While 310, 310S and 310H are listed in major ASME specifications such as <b>SA-240, SA-312, SA-213, SA-182 and SA-403<\/b>, <b>314 appears in none of them<\/b>. That has three practical consequences, and all three are <b>expensive if discovered after the project has started<\/b>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">314 and Pressure Equipment Codes<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>ASME Section VIII<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>No published allowable stress value was found for 314.<\/b> For comparison, 310H is listed in Section VIII Div. 1 up to <b>1500 \u00b0F (816 \u00b0C)<\/b>, where the design stress is <b>0.75 ksi (\u22485 MPa)<\/b>. <b>There is no such line for 314, so it cannot be used in an ASME stamped vessel.<\/b> The reason: code acceptance requires <b>long-term creep and rupture data<\/b>, and because 314 was never positioned as a <b>pressure material<\/b>, that data was never generated<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>The European side<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">1.4841 falls under <b>EN 10095<\/b> \u2014 but <b>EN 10095 is a &#8220;heat-resisting material&#8221; standard, not a pressure equipment standard<\/b>. Under PED a pressure-bearing part needs the material to appear in the <b>AD 2000-W \/ EN 13445<\/b> listings or to hold an approved <b>European Approval of Materials (EAM\/PMA)<\/b>. <b>Ask about this at the start of the project<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Where is 314 free?<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Everywhere pressure is absent.<\/b> Furnace linings and casings, radiant panels, muffles, annealing boxes, baskets, grids, hearth supports, glass moulds, burner cones, thermocouple protection sheaths, carburizing boxes. <b>This is 314&#8217;s real and fairly large market<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Practical rule<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>The question &#8220;is there pressure?&#8221; splits 314 in two.<\/b> If yes, <b>remove 314 from the list<\/b> and move to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-310\/\">310H<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/incoloy-800h\/\">800H<\/a> or the 253 MA class. If no, <b>314 is often the cheapest correct answer<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b3\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">MAXIMUM SERVICE TEMPERATURE \u2014 Continuous, Intermittent and by Atmosphere<\/h4>\n<p><!-- dm-diy-isil --><\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #e3e9ec;margin:22px 0 26px;background:#fff;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#12303f;color:#fff;padding:9px 14px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.3px;position:relative;z-index:2;\">HEAT TREATMENT \u2014 SCHEMATIC<\/div>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"padding:10px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:6px 0 6px;\">1 \u00b7 SOLUTION ANNEAL \u2014 this is the only valid heat treatment<\/div>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Step<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1 \u00b7 SOLUTION ANNEAL \u2014 this is the only valid heat treatment<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Summary<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">It takes the carbides AND THE SIGMA PHASE into solid solution, homogenizes the structure and restores toughness. IT DOES NOT RAISE STRENGTH, IT LOWERS IT.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Temperature<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1050-1150 \u00b0C \u2014 MORE THAN FOUR of BGH\/Metalcor, AGST, Rodacciai, Abrams and thyssenkrupp give the same band. Fuhong gives the same band as well. Virgamet gives 1100-1150 \u00b0C, the upper half of the band. AZoM gives 1038-1149 \u00b0C (1900-2100 \u00b0F), a band that reaches somewhat lower. Practical envelope: approximately 1050-1150 \u00b0C.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Time<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">No single soaking time could be confirmed by four independent sources, so none is written. The time follows from bringing the whole section to temperature.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Cooling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Water or air \u2014 BGH\/Metalcor, AGST, Rodacciai and Abrams use the same wording (&#8216;water, air&#8217; \/ &#8216;quench in water or cool rapidly in air&#8217;). Virgamet gives the nuance: a water quench is the rule, and air is enough for small parts down to 2 mm thick. AZoM likewise says water quench or rapid air cool. The purpose is to pass through both the carbide band and the SIGMA band without re-precipitation.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Note<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">The cycle is THE SAME as that of 1.4845; the difference between the two grades does not come from heat treatment, it comes from composition. This is shown from the same EN table on the comparison diagram.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Requirement<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Because 314 has no ASTM plate\/pipe\/tube specification, there is NO binding ASTM heat treatment floor by way of those forms. On the bar side ASTM A276 requires the material annealed (Condition A) but gives no temperature. The binding numbers come from EN practice.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:10px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:6px 0 6px;\">2 \u00b7 HOT FORMING<\/div>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Step<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">2 \u00b7 HOT FORMING<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Summary<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">This is not a heat treatment; it appears on the diagram because it shows where the sigma band ends.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Temperature<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1150-800 \u00b0C \u2014 AGST gives this band directly; Rodacciai gives 900-1200 \u00b0C for hot forging. The two bands diverge at the lower end and HAVE NOT BEEN REDUCED TO A SINGLE NUMBER.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Time<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Not written.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Cooling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Could not be confirmed by four independent sources; not written.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Note<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">The critical point: the lower limit of forming (800 \u00b0C) is close to the upper limit of the sigma band (900 \u00b0C). If forming reaches down into the sigma band, there is a risk of embrittlement.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Requirement<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">A solution anneal is applied once hot forming is finished.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:10px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:6px 0 6px;\">3 \u00b7 SIGMA PHASE BAND \u2014 not a treatment but a REGION TO AVOID. This is the most critical limit on 314.<\/div>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Step<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">3 \u00b7 SIGMA PHASE BAND \u2014 not a treatment but a REGION TO AVOID. This is the most critical limit on 314.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Summary<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Sigma is a hard, brittle chromium-iron phase. In this high-chromium alloy it precipitates out of the austenite and lowers toughness.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Temperature<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">AGST: 600-900 \u00b0C \u2014 &#8216;to avoid sigma-phase embrittlement, the material should not be processed in the temperature range between 600 \u00b0C and 900 \u00b0C.&#8217; Abrams: 650-900 \u00b0C (1202-1652 \u00b0F). AZoM states the same phenomenon in other words: it &#8216;can become very brittle when subjected to prolonged temperatures of 649-816 \u00b0C (1200-1500 \u00b0F)&#8217;. MFG Shop: 650-900 \u00b0C. NO SINGLE NUMBER HAS BEEN WRITTEN. Envelope: approximately 600-900 \u00b0C.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Time<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Sigma formation depends on time; because no time-temperature curve confirmed by four independent sources was found, NO CURVE HAS BEEN DRAWN.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Cooling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Not applicable.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Note<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">The practical consequence: 314 is not run CONTINUOUSLY inside this band. The service temperature lies above it (typically over 1000 \u00b0C). A part that has spent a long time inside the band becomes brittle and needs a solution anneal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Requirement<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">This is not a treatment recipe; it is shown on the diagram as a band.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:10px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:6px 0 6px;\">4 \u00b7 STRESS RELIEF \u2014 A TRAP ON 314<\/div>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Step<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">4 \u00b7 STRESS RELIEF \u2014 A TRAP ON 314<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Summary<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">The stress-relief range customary on austenitic stainless steels falls directly inside the sigma band.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Temperature<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NOT WRITTEN. The only figure found is Fuhong&#8217;s suggestion of 800-900 \u00b0C with air cooling after welding; that is a SINGLE source AND it CONFLICTS DIRECTLY with AGST&#8217;s warning that &#8216;the material should not be processed in the temperature range between 600 \u00b0C and 900 \u00b0C&#8217;. It has therefore not been put on the diagram.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Time<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">NOT WRITTEN.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Cooling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NOT WRITTEN.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Note<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">The point on which the sources agree is this: on 314 the restorative treatment is the 1050-1150 \u00b0C solution anneal. If a stress relief is required, its temperature must be confirmed with the supplier and the construction code; because of the sigma band this is not a standard austenitic recipe.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Requirement<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NO stress-relief recipe confirmed by four independent sources COULD BE FOUND for 314, and for that reason no number is written.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:10px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:6px 0 6px;\">5 \u00b7 SENSITIZATION (carbide precipitation)<\/div>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Step<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">5 \u00b7 SENSITIZATION (carbide precipitation)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Summary<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">314 is unstabilized and its carbon ceiling is high (0.25% in ASTM, 0.20% in EN).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Temperature<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">A sensitization band SPECIFIC to 314 COULD NOT BE FOUND in four independent sources and NO NUMBER HAS BEEN WRITTEN. The sources put the sigma phase to the front for 314; 314 is bought for dry high temperature, not for aqueous corrosion.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Time<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Not written.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Cooling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Not written.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Note<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">What that means in practice: 314 is not used in wet or aqueous corrosive service, and post-weld sensitization is not the defining problem of this grade. The defining problems are sigma, sulphur and carburization.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Requirement<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">This is not a treatment recipe.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:6px 14px 12px;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.7;border-top:1px solid #f0f3f5;position:relative;z-index:2;\">The diagram is schematic; the time axis is not to scale. No published TTT\/CCT curve was used, so no curve has been drawn. THIS ALLOY IS AUSTENITIC: IT IS NOT PRECIPITATION HARDENABLE. There is NO AGEING STEP such as H900 or H1075 and no ageing diagram has been drawn. 314 is an unstabilized grade; THERE IS ALSO NO STABILIZING ANNEAL (that belongs to 321). Strength is raised only by COLD WORK. This alloy IS NOT PRECIPITATION HARDENABLE. There is NO ageing step and no ageing diagram has been drawn. THERE IS ALSO NO STABILIZING ANNEAL on 314; 314 is an unstabilized grade. The stabilizing anneal belongs to 321. The solution anneal cycle (1050-1150 \u00b0C, water or air) is THE SAME for 1.4841 and 1.4845; the difference between the two grades comes from composition. The defining thermal limit of 314 is the SIGMA PHASE; the 600-900 \u00b0C envelope is confirmed by four sources and the limits are given with the source names. The stress-relief temperature IS NOT WRITTEN; the only figure found (Fuhong, 800-900 \u00b0C) conflicts directly with the sigma band and rests on a single source. A sensitization band specific to 314 could not be confirmed by four sources and is left BLANK. The time axis is not to scale; no published TTT\/CCT curve was used.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- \/dm-diy-isil --><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\">314&#8217;s entire sales case rests on <b>one number: 1150 \u00b0C in air<\/b>. That figure is <b>consistent across multiple independent European sources<\/b> and is 314&#8217;s real advantage over 310. But <b>what that number is \u2014 and what it is not<\/b> \u2014 must be written down as well.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Published Temperature Limits \u00b7 1.4841 \/ 314<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Scaling limit in air<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>\u22481150 \u00b0C.<\/b> Several independent producer and distributor datasheets give this value and <b>there is no conflict among the sources available here<\/b>. For comparison, <b>\u22481050 \u00b0C for 1.4845 (310S)<\/b>. One producer additionally gives a <b>\u22481100 \u00b0C corrosion-resistance limit<\/b> \u2014 <b>a separate number from the scaling limit<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Sulphur-bearing gases<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>LOW resistance to oxidizing and reducing sulphur-bearing gases up to 650 \u00b0C.<\/b> <b>Silicon buys nothing here<\/b> \u2014 the problem is not in the chromium but in the <b>20 % nickel<\/b> (see the corrosion section below)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Carburizing and low-oxygen gases<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">[CONFLICT] Two different statements circulate within the same European source family: one publication says <b>&#8220;fair resistance above 900 \u00b0C&#8221;<\/b>, another says <b>&#8220;poor resistance above 900 \u00b0C&#8221;<\/b>. <b>The conservative reading: 314 is slightly better than 310, but it is not the solution to a carburizing atmosphere<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>&#8220;Continuous&#8221; versus &#8220;intermittent&#8221;<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">The 314 sources available here <b>do not publish separate continuous \/ intermittent figures<\/b> the way 310 sources do; only a single scaling limit is given. <b>That is a gap and it must be filled:<\/b> the mechanism is the same as for 310 \u2014 <b>thermal cycling spalls the protective layer<\/b> and every spall consumes chromium and silicon. <b>Do not use 1150 \u00b0C as a design figure in heavily cyclic service<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>What is the strength at 1150 \u00b0C?<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Practically nil.<\/b> For scale: the typical tensile strength of 310S at 1093 \u00b0C is <b>\u224844 MPa<\/b>, its yield strength <b>\u224827 MPa<\/b> and its elongation <b>121 %<\/b>. <b>No independently verified table was found for 314<\/b> at those temperatures, but <b>the order of magnitude is the same<\/b>. <b>At 1150 \u00b0C the part carries no load: it flows and it sags<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b4\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Product Forms That Have NO Standard \u2014 314&#8217;s Most Critical Section<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>This is the most commercially important thing to know about 314.<\/b> An extra 100 \u00b0C of scaling resistance is worth nothing if <b>you cannot buy the alloy in the form you need<\/b>. Next to 310&#8217;s, <b>314&#8217;s ASTM coverage is close to empty<\/b>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Standard Gaps in 314 \u00b7 The ASTM Side<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Plate \u00b7 sheet \u00b7 strip<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>S31400 is NOT in ASTM A240.<\/b> &#8220;ASTM A240 Gr. 314 plate&#8221; <b>does not exist<\/b>, and if you see such a certificate you should <b>question it<\/b>. The correct route is <b>EN 10095 \u00b7 1.4841<\/b> plate<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Seamless and welded pipe \u00b7 tube<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>S31400 is NOT in A312, A358 or A409<\/b>, nor in <b>A213 or A249<\/b> for boiler and exchanger tube. On the European side some producers offer 1.4841 pipe under <b>EN 10216-5 \/ EN 10297-2<\/b> [SINGLE SOURCE] \u2014 <b>get written confirmation<\/b>. High-temperature tube otherwise goes to <b>A213 TP310S \/ TP310H<\/b> or nickel-base alloys<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Flanges and fittings<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>There is no F314 in A182 and no WP314 in A403.<\/b> A 314 flange on a pressure line is <b>outside any code<\/b>. For mechanical connections inside a furnace, the route is <b>A473 forgings with part-by-part acceptance<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Bolts and nuts<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>There is no class for 314 in A193 or A194<\/b> (the B8 family is 304-based, B8M 316, B8T\/B8C 321\/347). <b>A 314 fastener is a special manufacture:<\/b> machined from A276 bar, and <b>a lot-based test report must be specified<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Castings<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>There is no &#8220;cast 314&#8221; specification.<\/b> The heat-resisting casting side is the <b>ACI H series<\/b> (e.g. <b>HK<\/b>, ASTM A297; tubing <b>A351 HK40<\/b>). <b>Not the same material as wrought 314<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Matching filler wire<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>There is no ER314 in AWS A5.9.<\/b> In practice <b>ER310<\/b> or <b>1.4842<\/b> filler is used. <b>The seam carries less silicon than the base metal and is the weak link in scale resistance<\/b> \u2014 above 1100 \u00b0C <b>the weld line degrades first<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Practical purchasing rule<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Before ordering 314, answer &#8220;which standard, which product form&#8221;.<\/b> For plate, pipe and tube use the <b>European route (EN 10095 \/ 1.4841)<\/b>; for bar, forgings and wire the <b>ASTM route (A276 \/ A314 \/ A473 \/ A580)<\/b>. <b>A certificate that mixes the two is a red flag<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b5\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Chemical Composition<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\">ASTM and EN are given <b>separately<\/b>. Merging them is <b>especially wrong for this alloy<\/b>, because the divergence is <b>in silicon, and silicon is this alloy&#8217;s identity<\/b>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Chemical Composition \u00b7 ASTM S31400 (wt %)<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Chromium \u00b7 Nickel<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Cr 23.0\u201326.0 %<\/b> \u2014 <b>lower than the EN floor of 24.0 %<\/b> \u00b7 <b>Ni 19.0\u201322.0 %<\/b>, the same as 310<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Silicon (Si)<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>1.50\u20133.00 %<\/b> \u2014 <b>the identity of the alloy.<\/b> It builds an <b>SiO\u2082 diffusion barrier<\/b> beneath the chromium oxide. <b>The 3.0 % ceiling is specific to the ASTM side<\/b>, and <b>a very high-silicon heat is far more sigma-prone and far harder to weld<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Carbon (C)<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>\u22640.25 %<\/b> \u2014 <b>very high.<\/b> It makes <b>post-weld sensitization nearly certain<\/b> and by itself explains why 314 is not an aqueous-service material. In exchange it <b>contributes to creep strength<\/b>. Also <b>Mn \u22642.00 % \u00b7 P \u22640.045 % \u00b7 S \u22640.030 %<\/b>; <b>the ASTM row imposes no nitrogen limit<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Chemical Composition \u00b7 EN 1.4841 (X15CrNiSi25-21)<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Chromium \u00b7 Nickel<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Cr 24.0\u201326.0 % \u00b7 Ni 19.0\u201322.0 %<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Silicon (Si)<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>1.50\u20132.50 %.<\/b> [CONFLICT] one European catalogue, citing EN 10088-3, gives <b>1.50\u20132.00 %<\/b>. <b>Clarify which EN standard (10095 or 10088-3) you are ordering to<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Carbon (C)<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>\u22640.20 %.<\/b> In EN 10095 practice a <b>carbon minimum (\u22480.10 %)<\/b> is also cited; the producer datasheets available here publish only the ceiling. <b>Verify the minimum against the standard text<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Mn \u00b7 P \u00b7 S \u00b7 N<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Mn \u22642.00 % \u00b7 P \u22640.045 % \u00b7 S \u22640.015 % \u00b7 N \u22640.11 %<\/b>. <b>Sulphur is half the ASTM limit, and nitrogen is not limited in ASTM at all<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Naming trap<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">The correct EN name is <b>X15CrNiSi25-21<\/b>. The spelling <b>&#8220;X15CrNiSi25-20&#8221;<\/b> also circulates and is <b>wrong<\/b>. Some sources label 1.4841 as <b>&#8220;AISI 310&#8221;<\/b>; <b>that is a completely different alloy (no silicon)<\/b>. <b>Order by W.Nr.<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b6\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Mechanical Properties<\/h4>\n<p><!-- dm-diy-sert --><\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #e3e9ec;margin:22px 0 26px;background:#fff;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#12303f;color:#fff;padding:9px 14px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.3px;position:relative;z-index:2;\">STRENGTH VALUES<\/div>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"padding:12px 10px 0;\"><svg viewBox=\"0 0 740 400\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto;display:block;\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" role=\"img\"><rect x=\"16\" y=\"6\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\" fill=\"#12303f\"\/><text x=\"34\" y=\"16\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">Yield (MPa)<\/text><rect x=\"146\" y=\"6\" width=\"12\" height=\"12\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"164\" y=\"16\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">Tensile (MPa)<\/text><text x=\"16\" y=\"44\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"bold\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">ASTM A276 \u00b7 bars and shapes, HOT-FINISHED (S31400)<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"50\" width=\"541.6\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"564.6\" y=\"62\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">515<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"68\" width=\"215.6\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#12303f\"\/><text x=\"238.6\" y=\"80\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">205<\/text><text x=\"16\" y=\"108\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"bold\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">ASTM A276 \u00b7 bar, COLD-FINISHED, diameter\/thickness \u2264 12.70 mm (S31400)<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"114\" width=\"652.0\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"675.0\" y=\"126\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">620<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"132\" width=\"326.0\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#12303f\"\/><text x=\"349.0\" y=\"144\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">310<\/text><text x=\"16\" y=\"172\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"bold\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">ASTM A276 \u00b7 bar, COLD-FINISHED, diameter\/thickness > 12.70 mm (S31400)<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"178\" width=\"541.6\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"564.6\" y=\"190\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">515<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"196\" width=\"215.6\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#12303f\"\/><text x=\"238.6\" y=\"208\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">205<\/text><text x=\"16\" y=\"236\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"bold\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">EN 1.4841 \u00b7 flat product (EN 10095 table)<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"242\" width=\"578.4\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"601.4\" y=\"254\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">550<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"260\" width=\"241.9\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#12303f\"\/><text x=\"264.9\" y=\"272\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">230<\/text><text x=\"16\" y=\"300\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"bold\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">EN 1.4841 \u00b7 long product (thyssenkrupp table, A80)<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"306\" width=\"578.4\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"601.4\" y=\"318\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">550<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"324\" width=\"241.9\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#12303f\"\/><text x=\"264.9\" y=\"336\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">230<\/text><text x=\"16\" y=\"364\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"bold\" fill=\"#12303f\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">EN 1.4841 \u00b7 annealed rough-turned bar (Rodacciai table)<\/text><rect x=\"16\" y=\"370\" width=\"578.4\" height=\"15\" fill=\"#7fa8bd\"\/><text x=\"601.4\" y=\"382\" font-size=\"11.5\" fill=\"#5b7180\" font-family=\"Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif\">550<\/text><\/svg><\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Condition<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Hardness<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Yield MPa<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Tensile MPa<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Elongation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">ASTM A276 \u00b7 bars and shapes, HOT-FINISHED (S31400)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">205<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">515<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">40%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">ASTM A276 \u00b7 bar, COLD-FINISHED, diameter\/thickness \u2264 12.70 mm (S31400)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">310<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">620<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">30%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">ASTM A276 \u00b7 bar, COLD-FINISHED, diameter\/thickness > 12.70 mm (S31400)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">205<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">515<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">30%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">EN 1.4841 \u00b7 flat product (EN 10095 table)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">223 HB max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">230<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">550-750<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">30%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">EN 1.4841 \u00b7 long product (thyssenkrupp table, A80)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">223 HB max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">230<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">550-750<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">28%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">EN 1.4841 \u00b7 annealed rough-turned bar (Rodacciai table)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">550-750<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">30%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:10px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:6px 0 6px;\">Additional information<\/div>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Note<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">EVERY ROW IS A SPECIFICATION MINIMUM for room temperature; these are NOT typical values. BECAUSE THIS ALLOY IS NOT PRECIPITATION HARDENABLE, the rows are split by SPECIFICATION and PRODUCT FORM, not by ageing condition. THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT \u2014 THE ASTM SCOPE OF 314 IS NARROW: the only ASTM mechanical table is A276 (bars and shapes). S31400 \/ TP314 COULD NOT BE FOUND in the texts of ASTM A240, A312, A213, A249 and A479, and those rows are LEFT BLANK; that blank is not a gap in the research but a confirmed OUT-OF-SCOPE status, and it is marked as such in the table. SECOND POINT \u2014 ASTM AND EN DIVERGE: in ASTM A276 the minimums of 314 are THE SAME as 310 and 310S (515 \/ 205 MPa \/ 40%), whereas in EN 1.4841 they are HIGHER than 1.4845 (Rm 550-750 against 500-700 MPa, Rp0.2 230 against 210 MPa) and the elongation is LOWER (30\/28% against 35%). The two specifications give a different result for the same pair of materials; the ASTM and EN rows ARE NOT PUT ON ONE AXIS. THIRD POINT \u2014 the 689 MPa tensile \/ 345 MPa yield \/ 85 HRB figures given by AZoM are TYPICAL values, not specification minimums, and HAVE NOT BEEN PUT IN THE TABLE.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:6px 14px 12px;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.7;border-top:1px solid #f0f3f5;position:relative;z-index:2;\"><b style=\"color:#12303f;\">EVERY ROW IS A SPECIFICATION MINIMUM for room temperature; these are NOT typical values. BECAUSE THIS ALLOY IS NOT PRECIPITATION HARDENABLE, the rows are split by SPECIFICATION and PRODUCT FORM, not by ageing condition. THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT \u2014 THE ASTM SCOPE OF 314 IS NARROW: the only ASTM mechanical table is A276 (bars and shapes). S31400 \/ TP314 COULD NOT BE FOUND in the texts of ASTM A240, A312, A213, A249 and A479, and those rows are LEFT BLANK; that blank is not a gap in the research but a confirmed OUT-OF-SCOPE status, and it is marked as such in the table. SECOND POINT \u2014 ASTM AND EN DIVERGE: in ASTM A276 the minimums of 314 are THE SAME as 310 and 310S (515 \/ 205 MPa \/ 40%), whereas in EN 1.4841 they are HIGHER than 1.4845 (Rm 550-750 against 500-700 MPa, Rp0.2 230 against 210 MPa) and the elongation is LOWER (30\/28% against 35%). The two specifications give a different result for the same pair of materials; the ASTM and EN rows ARE NOT PUT ON ONE AXIS. THIRD POINT \u2014 the 689 MPa tensile \/ 345 MPa yield \/ 85 HRB figures given by AZoM are TYPICAL values, not specification minimums, and HAVE NOT BEEN PUT IN THE TABLE.<\/b> In the chart, a value given as a range is drawn at its lower bound; the full range is in the table. No row is a typical value; every row is a specification minimum. In ASTM A276 the room-temperature minimums of 314 are THE SAME as 310 and 310S (515 \/ 205 MPa \/ 40% \/ RA 50%). The silicon difference does not show at room temperature. In EN 1.4841 the yield minimum is 230 MPa and the tensile band 550-750 MPa; those are 20 and 50 MPa above 1.4845. The price is in elongation: 30% (28% on long products) against 35% for 1.4845. The ASTM A240, A312, A213, A249 and A479 rows are BLANK because S31400 \/ TP314 COULD NOT BE FOUND in those specifications. That is a confirmed out-of-scope status. AZoM&#8217;s 689 \/ 345 MPa and 85 HRB figures are TYPICAL values and have not been put in the table. The ASTM A276 table gives no hardness ceiling and those cells are left BLANK. A hardness ceiling was found only on the EN side (223 HB).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- \/dm-diy-sert --><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>314&#8217;s mechanical data is both scarcer and more one-sided than 310&#8217;s:<\/b> the European side has clear minima, while on the ASTM side there is <b>no comparable minimum table, because there is no plate specification such as A240<\/b>. Below, the <b>minimum\/typical distinction is made explicitly<\/b>; confusing the two is particularly easy with 314, because the typical values in circulation sit <b>50 % above the minima<\/b>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Room-Temperature Values<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>EN 1.4841 MINIMA (solution annealed)<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Rp0.2 \u2265230 MPa<\/b> \u00b7 <b>Rp1.0 \u2265270 MPa<\/b> \u00b7 <b>Rm 550\u2013750 MPa<\/b> \u00b7 <b>A5 \u226530 %<\/b> (transverse specimen <b>A80 \u226528 %<\/b>) \u00b7 <b>\u2264223 HBW<\/b>. <b>This table is identical across several independent European sources<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>The common &#8220;typical&#8221; table<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Many English-language datasheets publish <b>Rm \u2248689 MPa \u00b7 Rp0.2 \u2248345 MPa \u00b7 A \u224840 % \u00b7 \u224885 HRB \u00b7 E \u2248200 GPa<\/b>. <b>CAUTION: these are TYPICAL, not minima<\/b>, and they sit <b>50 % above the EN minimum in yield<\/b>. <b>Do not design to them<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Compared with 310S<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>314 (EN): Rp0.2 \u2265230 \u00b7 Rm 550\u2013750 \u00b7 A5 \u226530 %<\/b> \u00b7 <b>310S (EN): Rp0.2 \u2265210 \u00b7 Rm 500\u2013700 \u00b7 A5 \u226535 %<\/b>. <b>314 is stronger, 310S is more ductile<\/b> \u2014 silicon&#8217;s expected effect. Note that <b>314 cannot be hardened by heat treatment<\/b>; the only route is cold work, which <b>disappears at the first anneal in service<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Elevated-temperature tensile table<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>No detailed, independently verified Rp0.2 \/ Rm versus temperature table was found for 314.<\/b> The sources available here give room-temperature values only. <b>The 310S table can be consulted for order of magnitude<\/b> (Rm \u224844 MPa at 1093 \u00b0C), <b>but that is not 314 data and must not be presented as such<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Creep and Rupture Data<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Status<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>No independently verified creep\u2013rupture table was found for 314 \/ 1.4841.<\/b> One European compilation gives 10,000 h rupture as <b>600 \u00b0C: \u2248157 MPa \u00b7 700 \u00b0C: \u224863 MPa \u00b7 800 \u00b0C: \u224825 MPa<\/b> \u2014 <b>but the same compilation publishes the SAME figures for 1.4845 (310S)<\/b>, which is <b>suspicious<\/b>. [SINGLE SOURCE \u00b7 DOUBTFUL]<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>What to do<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>If you must design a 314 part to carry load in the creep range (above roughly 550 \u00b0C), take the data directly from the EN 10095 tables<\/b> \u2014 and accept from the outset that, <b>with no ASME code coverage<\/b>, that part cannot belong to code equipment. <b>Note also that silicon does not dramatically raise creep strength; its job is surface protection. 314&#8217;s advantage over 310 is in the scaling limit, not in creep strength<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b7\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Physical Properties<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\">314&#8217;s physical properties are very close to 310&#8217;s; <b>the only visible effect of silicon is in electrical resistivity<\/b>. The two numbers that govern design are the same: <b>high thermal expansion<\/b> and <b>low thermal conductivity<\/b>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Physical Properties \u00b7 1.4841 \/ 314 (20 \u00b0C)<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Density \u00b7 modulus<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">Density <b>7.9 g\/cm\u00b3<\/b>, consistent across several European sources. Elastic modulus <b>196 GPa<\/b> (European tradition); some English-language datasheets give <b>200 GPa<\/b> [CONFLICT]<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Thermal conductivity<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>20 \u00b0C: 15 W\/m\u00b7K<\/b> \u00b7 <b>500 \u00b0C: 19 W\/m\u00b7K<\/b>; specific heat <b>500 J\/kg\u00b7K<\/b>. <b>Roughly 30 % of that of unalloyed steel<\/b> \u2014 that single fact explains most of the distortion in welding and the thermal stress in service<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Electrical resistivity<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>0.90 \u03a9\u00b7mm\u00b2\/m (90 \u00b5\u03a9\u00b7cm)<\/b>. For comparison, <b>0.85 for 1.4845 (310S)<\/b>. <b>Silicon raises resistivity<\/b> \u2014 relevant to induction heating and resistance-measurement applications. <b>Non-magnetic when annealed<\/b>; but because silicon is a ferrite former, <b>high-silicon heats may contain traces of delta ferrite giving a measurable magnetic response<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Thermal expansion (\u00d710\u207b\u2076\/K)<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Rises from <b>\u224815.5 over 20\u2013200 \u00b0C<\/b> to <b>\u224819.0 over 20\u20131000 \u00b0C<\/b>. <b>In practice:<\/b> a <b>3 m 1.4841 beam heated to 1000 \u00b0C grows by about 57 mm<\/b>. In furnace linings, panels and grids, <b>without an expansion allowance the part twists itself apart<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b8\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Heat Treatment and Thermal Stability<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>314 cannot be hardened by heat treatment.<\/b> Its only heat treatment is the <b>solution anneal<\/b>: dissolve carbides and second phases back into the austenite, then cool before they can precipitate again. <b>Because of the silicon this is more critical in 314 than in 310<\/b>, since the damaging phases precipitate faster.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Heat Treatment Parameters \u00b7 314 \/ 1.4841<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Solution anneal<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\">European practice <b>1050\u20131150 \u00b0C<\/b>, soak through, <b>rapid water or air cooling<\/b>; North American practice <b>1038\u20131149 \u00b0C (1900\u20132100 \u00b0F)<\/b> with water quench or rapid air cooling. <b>The two traditions describe practically the same window<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Forging<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">The classic recipe: <b>heat SLOWLY to 871 \u00b0C<\/b>, <b>soak thoroughly<\/b> so it is uniform, then <b>raise rapidly to 1093\u20131232 \u00b0C<\/b> and forge. A European source gives the forging range as <b>1175\u20131000 \u00b0C<\/b> followed by <b>rapid air or water cooling<\/b>. <b>The slow-heating requirement comes from the thermal-shock sensitivity of silicon-bearing austenite<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>After hot forming<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Always solution anneal.<\/b> Otherwise the part <b>passes slowly through the damaging 600\u2013900 \u00b0C band<\/b> as it cools and is embrittled before it ever enters service. <b>Cooling must be rapid<\/b>; in heavy sections the centre cools slowly and sigma and carbide precipitation begin there<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Stress relief<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>DO NOT.<\/b> The carbon-steel reflex of a 550\u2013900 \u00b0C stress relief sits <b>exactly in the middle of the damaging band<\/b> for 314, and <b>because of the silicon its effect is faster than in 310<\/b>. If something is required, the only answer is a <b>full solution anneal plus rapid cooling<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b9\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">SIGMA PHASE AND EMBRITTLEMENT \u2014 314&#8217;s Black Box<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>This is 314&#8217;s most serious weakness and it is a direct consequence of silicon.<\/b> Sigma (\u03c3) is a hard, brittle iron\u2013chromium intermetallic that nucleates at grain boundaries in high-chromium austenitic steels. <b>Silicon is a strong ferrite\/sigma former:<\/b> silicon is <b>deliberately capped at \u22640.75 % in 310H<\/b> for exactly this reason. <b>In 314 it is deliberately HIGH at 1.5\u20132.5 % (up to 3.0 % in ASTM)<\/b> \u2014 so 314 is, by design, <b>a more sigma-prone alloy<\/b>. A European compilation explicitly notes a <b>&#8220;higher embrittlement tendency&#8221;<\/b> for 1.4841.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>Its most dangerous trait is that the damage is invisible at temperature.<\/b> A sigma-loaded 314 part is <b>still ductile at 900 \u00b0C<\/b> and runs normally. The failure comes <b>when the plant stops and the part reaches room temperature<\/b>: impact toughness and elongation have collapsed. While a furnace panel is being removed, a grid lifted or a basket straightened with a hammer, the part <b>shatters like glass<\/b>. <b>314 parts that have run hot must not be impacted, bent or forced at room temperature.<\/b><\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Embrittlement Windows and How to Manage Them<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Published bands<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>649\u2013816 \u00b0C (1200\u20131500 \u00b0F)<\/b> \u2014 one English-language source, noting that 314 <b>&#8220;becomes brittle on prolonged exposure&#8221;<\/b>. <b>600\u2013900 \u00b0C<\/b> \u2014 a European compilation, for sigma. [CONFLICT] <b>Take the conservative envelope: \u2248600\u2013900 \u00b0C<\/b>, and if the 310 data is included as well, push the upper bound to <b>\u2248950 \u00b0C<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Sensitization (separate)<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>314&#8217;s ASTM carbon ceiling is 0.25 %<\/b> \u2014 <b>very high<\/b> among austenitic stainless steels. In the 550\u2013800 \u00b0C band <b>M\u2082\u2083C\u2086 chromium carbide<\/b> precipitates at grain boundaries, the adjacent metal is depleted of chromium, and <b>intergranular corrosion<\/b> begins. <b>Sigma is loss of toughness, sensitization is loss of corrosion resistance; in 314 they happen together<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Accelerating factors<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Silicon (the main factor)<\/b> \u00b7 <b>high chromium (25 %)<\/b> \u00b7 <b>cold deformation<\/b> \u00b7 <b>ferrite in the weld metal<\/b>. <b>High-silicon heats near the ASTM top end (close to 3.0 %) are markedly riskier<\/b> \u2014 which makes the EN ceiling of 2.50 % <b>the safer engineering choice<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Is it reversible?<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>YES.<\/b> A <b>solution anneal at 1100\u20131150 \u00b0C plus rapid cooling<\/b> dissolves the sigma and restores toughness. <b>Re-annealing critical 314 parts at planned shutdowns is an extremely economical maintenance strategy that most plants never consider<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Detection<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Sigma is not magnetic<\/b>, so a magnet will not find it. Detection is <b>metallographic<\/b> (electrolytic KOH\/NaOH etching colours it). In the field the only practical sign is <b>unexpected brittleness in bending or impact<\/b>. <b>314 is austenitic and is NOT susceptible to 475 \u00b0C embrittlement<\/b> \u2014 that belongs to ferritic and duplex stainless steels<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b10\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Welding<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>314 is weldable, but it is among the hardest austenitics to weld<\/b>, for <b>three separate reasons<\/b>. <b>First:<\/b> the weld metal is <b>fully austenitic<\/b> \u2014 there is no <b>3\u201310 % delta ferrite<\/b> safety valve as in 304 and 316, so <b>hot cracking risk is high<\/b>. <b>Second:<\/b> silicon shifts the solidification range and <b>increases the hot-cracking tendency further<\/b>. <b>Third:<\/b> the ASTM carbon ceiling is <b>0.25 %<\/b>, which makes <b>intergranular corrosion in the as-welded condition nearly certain<\/b>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Welding Parameters and Rules \u00b7 314<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Filler metal<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>There is NO matching AWS class (ER314).<\/b> In practice <b>AWS A5.9 ER310<\/b> or, in Europe, W.Nr. <b>1.4842<\/b> filler is used; covered electrodes <b>A5.4 E310-15\/-16<\/b> or EN ISO <b>3581 E 25 20<\/b>. <b>Consequence: the seam carries less silicon than the base metal<\/b> and is <b>the weak link in scale resistance above 1100 \u00b0C<\/b> \u2014 on critical parts, <b>place the weld line away from the hottest zone<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Preheat \u00b7 interpass<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Preheat is <b>NOT required<\/b> \u2014 it only extends the time spent in the damaging band. <b>Interpass \u2264150 \u00b0C.<\/b> This figure is <b>not negotiable<\/b> and is the single most effective control on hot cracking. In heavy sections <b>wait for interpass cooling<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Heat input and speed<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Keep heat input low:<\/b> narrow passes, fast travel, <b>minimal weaving<\/b>. <b>Because thermal conductivity is only about 30 % that of unalloyed steel, high welding speed is needed on thin sheet to avoid overheating.<\/b> Low conductivity plus high expansion equals <b>distortion<\/b>: use <b>back-step<\/b> technique, a balanced sequence and sufficient tacking. <b>TIG, MIG\/MAG, SMAW, SAW and laser are all suitable; on thin sheet laser and TIG are preferred<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>After welding<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Heat treatment is normally unnecessary; stress relief is FORBIDDEN.<\/b> If required, the only option is a <b>full solution anneal plus rapid cooling<\/b>. <b>Heat tint is not harmless:<\/b> mechanical cleaning with stainless-dedicated tools \u2192 <b>pickling<\/b> \u2192 <b>passivation<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>As-welded corrosion<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>314 is susceptible to intergranular corrosion in the as-welded condition.<\/b> If a welded part will see aqueous or condensing service, a <b>post-weld solution anneal is mandatory<\/b> \u2014 or <b>choose low-carbon <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-310\/\">310S<\/a> instead of 314<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b11\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Machining<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\">Machining 314 is <b>harder than machining 310<\/b>, for two reasons: <b>high carbon (\u22640.25 %) forms hard carbides<\/b> and <b>silicon acts as an abrasive<\/b>. To that, add the classic austenitic problems: <b>gummy chips, strong work hardening, poor heat conduction<\/b>. Heat accumulates in the tool, the uncut surface work-hardens, and the next pass enters <b>hardened material<\/b>.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">Machining Guide \u00b7 314<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Assessment \u00b7 cutting speed<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Medium machinability<\/b>; the producer note is explicit \u2014 <b>&#8220;carbides can form during processing&#8221;<\/b> \u2014 so <b>low cutting speeds and adequate cooling<\/b> are essential. [SINGLE SOURCE] One published comparison gives <b>40\u201360 m\/min for 314<\/b> against <b>50\u201370 m\/min for 310S<\/b>. <b>Those figures could not be independently verified<\/b>; however <b>the direction \u2014 that 314 machines more slowly than 310S \u2014 is reliable<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Tooling<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Sharp, positive-rake, coated carbide.<\/b> One producer recommends <b>high-speed steel tooling with generous coolant<\/b> for turning. <b>Continuing with a dull tool is the most expensive error in 314:<\/b> a dull tool smears rather than cuts, and smeared surface work-hardens<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Feed and depth of cut<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Heavy and steady.<\/b> <b>Light feeds are forbidden<\/b> \u2014 the edge rubs in the work-hardened layer. <b>Depth of cut must exceed the hardened depth left by the previous pass.<\/b> Coolant must be <b>flooded, pressurised and uninterrupted<\/b>; if a chlorinated fluid was used the part <b>must be cleaned<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Drilling \u00b7 tapping<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\">Short drills, frequent peck; <b>never let the drill dwell without cutting<\/b>. <b>Tapping is the hardest operation:<\/b> oversize taps, spiral flutes, <b>cut taps rather than form taps<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b12\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Corrosion \u2014 Where It Works, Where It FAILS<\/h4>\n<p><!-- dm-diy-kars --><\/p>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #e3e9ec;margin:22px 0 26px;background:#fff;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#12303f;color:#fff;padding:9px 14px;font-size:14px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.3px;position:relative;z-index:2;\">314 \u2014 310 \u2014 310S COMPARISON: THE SILICON DIFFERENCE AND HIGH-TEMPERATURE BEHAVIOUR<\/div>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"padding:8px 12px 0;font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">A \u00b7 SILICON AND COMPOSITION \u2014 ASTM A276 composition table (SAME SPECIFICATION, SAME TABLE). All three UNS numbers are in this table.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:2px 12px 0;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.6;\">The ASTM A276 \/ A276M composition table. S31400, S31000 and S31008 are listed side by side in the same table, which is what makes the comparison legitimate.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Criterion<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 314<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 310<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 310S<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Difference<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">SILICON (Si)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.50 &#8211; 3.00%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.50% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.50% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">THIS IS THE ONE DECISIVE DIFFERENCE. On 314 silicon is a BAND, not a CEILING, and it has a LOWER limit: 1.50% minimum. The silicon CEILING of 310 is the silicon FLOOR of 314. At worst 314 carries as much silicon as the richest heat of 310; at best twice as much.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Carbon (C)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">0.25% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">0.25% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">0.08% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">314 and 310 are THE SAME. 310S carries less than a third of that carbon; where aqueous corrosion and sensitization are in question, that is where the difference arises.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Chromium (Cr)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">23.00 &#8211; 26.00%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">24.00 &#8211; 26.00%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">24.00 &#8211; 26.00%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">The LOWER limit of 314 is ONE POINT LOWER. That is, 314 may be poorer in chromium, not richer. THE HIGH-TEMPERATURE ADVANTAGE DOES NOT COME FROM CHROMIUM.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Nickel (Ni)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">19.00 &#8211; 22.00%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">19.00 &#8211; 22.00%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">19.00 &#8211; 22.00%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">NO DIFFERENCE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Manganese (Mn) \u00b7 Phosphorus (P) \u00b7 Sulfur (S)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">2.00% \u00b7 0.045% \u00b7 0.030% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">2.00% \u00b7 0.045% \u00b7 0.030% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">2.00% \u00b7 0.045% \u00b7 0.030% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NO DIFFERENCE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:8px 12px 0;font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">B \u00b7 ROOM-TEMPERATURE MINIMUMS \u2014 ASTM A276 mechanical table (SAME SPECIFICATION, SAME TABLE, hot-finished)<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:2px 12px 0;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.6;\">The ASTM A276 \/ A276M mechanical table. The values are SPECIFICATION MINIMUMS.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Criterion<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 314<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 310<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 310S<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Difference<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Tensile strength minimum<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">515 MPa (75 ksi)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">515 MPa (75 ksi)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">515 MPa (75 ksi)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NO DIFFERENCE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Yield strength minimum (0.2%)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">205 MPa (30 ksi)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">205 MPa (30 ksi)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">205 MPa (30 ksi)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">NO DIFFERENCE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Elongation minimum (50 mm)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">40%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">40%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">40%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NO DIFFERENCE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Reduction of area minimum<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">50%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">50%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">50%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">NO DIFFERENCE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">CONCLUSION<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">AT ROOM TEMPERATURE THE THREE GRADES ARE THE SAME. What is paid for the silicon IS NOT COLLECTED at room temperature; it is collected only when hot. 314 is not a strength grade.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:8px 12px 0;font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">C \u00b7 COMPOSITION \u2014 EN 10095 table (SAME SPECIFICATION, SAME TABLE)<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:2px 12px 0;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.6;\">The EN 10095 composition table; the worldstainless table and the Metalcor and thyssenkrupp sheets give the same numbers independently.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Criterion<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 314<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 310<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 310S<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Difference<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">SILICON (Si)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4841: 1.50 &#8211; 2.50%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 1.50% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 1.50% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">On the EN side too the difference is silicon. NOTE: the EN upper limit is 2.50% while that of ASTM A276 is 3.00% \u2014 the two specifications are not the same.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Carbon (C)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4841: 0.20% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 0.10% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 0.10% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">The carbon of 1.4841 is twice as high.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">CHROMIUM (Cr)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4841: 24.0 &#8211; 26.0%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 24.0 &#8211; 26.0%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 24.0 &#8211; 26.0%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NO DIFFERENCE \u2014 THE BANDS ARE EXACTLY THE SAME. This is the cleanest proof that the 100 \u00b0C gap in the next block does not come from chromium.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">NICKEL (Ni)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4841: 19.0 &#8211; 22.0%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 19.0 &#8211; 22.0%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 19.0 &#8211; 22.0%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">NO DIFFERENCE \u2014 THE BANDS ARE EXACTLY THE SAME.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Nitrogen (N)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4841: 0.11% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 0.11% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 0.11% max.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">NO DIFFERENCE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:8px 12px 0;font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">D \u00b7 MAXIMUM SERVICE TEMPERATURE IN AIR \u2014 EN 10095 (SAME SPECIFICATION, SAME TABLE). THIS IS THE CORE OF THIS DIAGRAM.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:2px 12px 0;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.6;\">The EN 10095 scaling resistance figure in air. Outokumpu gives both grades side by side and on the SAME criterion in its own Therma comparison table; Metalcor, thyssenkrupp, AGST, BGH and Witte repeat the same numbers independently.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Criterion<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 314<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 310<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 310S<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Difference<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Maximum service temperature in air (EN 10095)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4841: 1150 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 1050 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 1050 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">+100 \u00b0C. Since the chromium and nickel bands in the preceding block are EXACTLY THE SAME, the only explanation for that difference is SILICON. AGST writes the reason directly: &#8216;The silicon content of 1.50 to 2.00% provides a scale resistance of 1150 \u00b0C (in air).&#8217; Silicon builds a silicon-rich, adherent, slow-growing oxide layer at the surface.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">CONTINUOUS service ceiling (the producers&#8217; practical note)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">BGH: scaling resistance to 1150 \u00b0C in air, corrosion resistance to 1100 \u00b0C \u00b7 Virgamet: &#8216;heat-resistant up to 1150 \u00b0C, in practice up to 1100 \u00b0C&#8217; \u00b7 Abrams: oxidation resistance up to 1100 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">thyssenkrupp: &#8216;for construction parts which should be resistant to scaling up to about 1050 \u00b0C&#8217; \u00b7 Sandmeyer: continuous oxidizing service 1050 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Witte: &#8216;remains scale-resistant up to approximately 1050 \u00b0C&#8217;<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">The producers pull the nominal 1150 \u00b0C of 314 back to 1100 \u00b0C in practice. No such reduction is recorded on the 310 side. The gap is held at roughly 50 \u00b0C in practice as well.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">INTERMITTENT (thermally cycled) service ceiling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED BY FOUR INDEPENDENT SOURCES \u2014 BLANK. The only figure found is Fuhong&#8217;s 1035 \u00b0C, which rests on a SINGLE source.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">AZoM, Austral Wright and Atlas-derived sources: 1035 \u00b0C (BELOW the continuous 1150 \u00b0C)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">The same sources: 1035 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">THE TWO CEILINGS ARE NOT THE SAME THING AND THE INTERMITTENT ONE IS LOWER. The reason is metallurgical: under thermal cycling the difference in expansion between the oxide layer and the base metal spalls the scale, the protective layer has to re-form at every cycle and metal loss accelerates. For 314 this figure COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED AND IS LEFT BLANK; if 314 is to be used in thermally cycled service, cyclic oxidation data for that heat must be requested from the supplier.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Solution anneal temperature<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4841: 1050-1150 \u00b0C, water or air<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 1050-1150 \u00b0C, water or air<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 1050-1150 \u00b0C, water or air<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">NO DIFFERENCE. The heat treatment cycle is THE SAME; the difference comes from composition, not from heat treatment.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:8px 12px 0;font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">E \u00b7 EN MECHANICAL MINIMUMS \u2014 EN table (SAME SPECIFICATION). Here there IS a difference, and it runs opposite to the ASTM one.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:2px 12px 0;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.6;\">The EN 10095 \/ EN 10088-3 mechanical table; Metalcor, thyssenkrupp, AGST, Rodacciai and BGH give the same numbers.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Criterion<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 314<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 310<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 310S<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Difference<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Yield strength minimum Rp0.2<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4841: \u2265 230 MPa<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: \u2265 210 MPa<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: \u2265 210 MPa<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">314 is 20 MPa higher.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Tensile strength band Rm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4841: 550 &#8211; 750 MPa<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 500 &#8211; 700 MPa<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: 500 &#8211; 700 MPa<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">The band of 314 is shifted 50 MPa upward.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Elongation minimum<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4841: \u2265 30% (flat) \u00b7 \u2265 28% (long, A80)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: \u2265 35%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: \u2265 35%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">The elongation of 314 is 5 points LOWER. THE TEMPERATURE GAIN IS PAID FOR OUT OF DUCTILITY.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Hardness ceiling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4841: \u2264 223 HB<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: \u2264 192 HB<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">1.4845: \u2264 192 HB<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">314 is harder; that too is a consequence of the high silicon.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">NOTE<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">The two grades DIVERGE in the EN table and DO NOT DIVERGE in the ASTM A276 table. The same pair of materials gives a different result in the two specifications; the EN and ASTM rows ARE NOT PUT ON ONE AXIS.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:8px 12px 0;font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">F \u00b7 ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITS \u2014 THIS IS NOT a numerical comparison; it is given with the source names<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:2px 12px 0;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.6;\">In this block the sources do not share one table; every statement is given together with WHO SAID IT.<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:12px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-x:auto;position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;min-width:430px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Criterion<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 314<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 310<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">AISI 310S<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:7px 9px;text-align:left;font-size:12px;color:#12303f;background:#F2F6F8;border:1px solid #eceff1;\">Difference<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Carburizing atmosphere<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">AGST: medium resistance up to approx. 900 \u00b0C against nitrogenous, carburising and low-oxygen gases. thyssenkrupp: &#8216;resistance to carbonising gases, especially over 900 \u00b0C, is low.&#8217; BGH: the maximum operational temperature is lowered in carburizing or reducing atmospheres.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Sandmeyer: maximum service 850-950 \u00b0C in carburizing and nitriding atmospheres. Rolled Alloys and NeoNickel: moderately carburizing environments are suitable; severe ones require RA330\/RA333.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">The same.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">That silicon RAISES carburization resistance is written by AZoM and MFG Shop; but the ABSOLUTE ceiling on both grades is about 900 \u00b0C. The 1150 \u00b0C advantage of 314 belongs to OXIDIZING (in-air) service ONLY and CANNOT BE CARRIED OVER to a carburizing atmosphere.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Sulphur-bearing atmosphere<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">AGST: resistance to oxidising and reducing sulphurous gases up to about 650 \u00b0C. thyssenkrupp: the resistance is &#8216;low&#8217;. Virgamet: at high sulphur concentrations the heat resistance drops to approximately 900 \u00b0C.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">Sandmeyer: with sulphur above 2 g\/m\u00b3 the ceiling drops to 950 \u00b0C. thyssenkrupp: resistance above 900 \u00b0C is &#8216;very low&#8217;.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">The same.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">BOTH GRADES COLLAPSE IN SULPHUR-BEARING ENVIRONMENTS. Silicon does not save the situation here. This is the sharpest fall on 314: 1150 \u00b0C in air, 650-900 \u00b0C with sulphur. Outokumpu gives the general rule: in oxidizing and reducing sulphurous environments ferritic steels perform better than austenitic ones.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Sigma phase<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">AGST: the material SHOULD NOT BE PROCESSED between 600 and 900 \u00b0C. Abrams: 650-900 \u00b0C. AZoM: on a long hold at 649-816 \u00b0C it &#8216;can become very brittle&#8217;.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">Sandmeyer 650-950 \u00b0C \u00b7 Atlas 650-900 \u00b0C \u00b7 Outokumpu 600-850 \u00b0C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">The same bands; the low carbon DOES NOT REMOVE sigma.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">THE SIGMA BAND IS OF THE SAME SIZE ON BOTH GRADES. Silicon does not solve this problem; the high-temperature advantage DOES NOT REMOVE the obligation to avoid the sigma band.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;\">Specification scope (the supply limit)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">ASTM: A276, A314, A473, A580 only (bar, billet, forging, wire). NO ASTM for plate, sheet, pipe, tube and flanges. AMS 5522 and 5652 exist. EN 10095 \/ 1.4841 is the governing standard.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">ASTM: A276, A314, A473, A580, A182 F310. S31000 is OUT OF SCOPE for plate (A240), pressure-vessel bar (A479), pipe (A312) and tube (A213\/A249).<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">ASTM: A240, A276, A312, A213, A249, A358, A479, A580 \u2014 every form is covered.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(247,250,251,.78);color:#3d5260;\">IN TERMS OF SUPPLY AND CERTIFICATION THE WIDEST SCOPE IS 310S. 314 and 310 (S31000) are narrow in scope in a similar way. This is not a property of the material but a limit on ordering and certification, and it must be settled before the contract.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:10px 12px 2px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative;z-index:2;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:13.5px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:6px 0 6px;\">Additional information<\/div>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:13.5px;background:transparent;\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:34%;vertical-align:top;\">Compared with<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:6px 9px;border:1px solid #eceff1;background:rgba(255,255,255,.72);color:#3d5260;\">AISI 314 (UNS S31400 \u00b7 1.4841) \u2014 AISI 310 (UNS S31000) \u2014 AISI 310S (UNS S31008 \u00b7 1.4845)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:6px 14px 12px;font-size:12px;color:#5b7180;line-height:1.7;border-top:1px solid #f0f3f5;position:relative;z-index:2;\">RULE: every block on this diagram is read from a SINGLE TABLE of a SINGLE SPECIFICATION. Blocks A and B are read from the same two tables of ASTM A276; blocks C, D and E from the same tables of EN 10095 \/ EN 10088-3. All three UNS numbers are within the scope of ASTM A276 and both EN numbers within the scope of EN 10095. THE ASTM BLOCKS AND THE EN BLOCKS ARE NOT ADDED TOGETHER AND ARE NOT PUT ON ONE AXIS. Every block is read from a single table of a single specification; the ASTM and EN rows are not put on one axis. In THE SAME ASTM A276 table the ROOM-TEMPERATURE minimums of the three grades are THE SAME; the silicon difference does not show at room temperature. In THE SAME EN 10095 table the chromium (24.0-26.0%) and nickel (19.0-22.0%) bands are EXACTLY THE SAME on both grades; the 100 \u00b0C gap in air comes from silicon alone. That is the proof asked for. THE CONTINUOUS AND INTERMITTENT CEILINGS ARE WRITTEN SEPARATELY. For 310\/310S the intermittent ceiling of 1035 \u00b0C and the continuous ceiling of 1150 \u00b0C were found in three sources; for 314 the INTERMITTENT ceiling could not be confirmed by four sources and is LEFT BLANK. The silicon upper limit for 314 is 3.00% in ASTM A276 and 2.50% in EN 1.4841. The two specifications ARE NOT THE SAME and one heat may not satisfy both. Block F is not a numerical comparison; because the sources come from separate texts, it is given with the source names. Virgamet and Fuhong equate 1.4841 with AISI 310 \/ S31000; that equivalence is wrong because of the silicon band and has not been used in the comparison.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- \/dm-diy-kars --><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\">314&#8217;s corrosion profile is <b>sharply one-directional: it is among the best in its class in dry, oxidizing, hot air, and weak almost everywhere else.<\/b> The sentence &#8220;it is highly alloyed, therefore more corrosion resistant&#8221; is <b>particularly wrong for 314<\/b>, because its <b>carbon ceiling is 0.25 %<\/b> and it contains <b>no molybdenum<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">High-temperature oxidation \u2014 the reason 314 exists<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\">25 % chromium builds a <b>Cr\u2082O\u2083<\/b> layer at the surface, and <b>1.5\u20132.5 % silicon forms a thin, adherent SiO\u2082 sub-layer beneath it<\/b>. That sub-layer is a <b>diffusion barrier<\/b>: it slows oxygen inward and chromium outward. The result is that <b>the scaling limit in air rises from \u22481050 \u00b0C to \u22481150 \u00b0C<\/b>. <b>But the protection is conditional:<\/b> if the layer spalls under thermal cycling, is damaged mechanically or is attacked chemically, <b>the metal beneath must give up chromium and silicon again<\/b>. Every renewal consumes the reserve. <b>314&#8217;s life is the life of its remaining chromium and silicon reserve<\/b> \u2014 which is why <b>thin 314 sections die disproportionately faster than thick ones<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">Sulphidation \u2014 where silicon buys nothing at all<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>This is 314&#8217;s clearest failure and it never appears in sales literature.<\/b> European datasheets state plainly, for 1.4841, <b>&#8220;low resistance to oxidizing and reducing sulphur-bearing gases up to 650 \u00b0C&#8221;<\/b>. The reason lies <b>not in the chromium or the silicon but in the NICKEL<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>The mechanism.<\/b> In <b>oxidizing sulphur<\/b> (SO\u2082, SO\u2083, excess-air combustion gas) the chromium oxide survives and 314 behaves <b>acceptably<\/b> \u2014 but the ceiling drops; the rule published for 310 is that <b>above 2 g\/m\u00b3 of sulphur the maximum falls to 950 \u00b0C<\/b>, and <b>there is no reason to expect different behaviour from 314<\/b>. In <b>reducing sulphur<\/b> (H\u2082S, low-oxygen sulphur-bearing gas) the protective oxide cannot form; sulphur reaches the metal and produces a <b>nickel\u2013nickel-sulphide eutectic that MELTS at about 645 \u00b0C<\/b>. A <b>liquid phase<\/b> appears at the grain boundaries and the part <b>dissolves from the inside<\/b>. <b>An alloy with 20 % nickel performs WORSE in reducing sulphidizing gas than a low-nickel alloy \u2014 and silicon does not change that.<\/b> <b>Practical rule: do not use 314 in reducing atmospheres containing H\u2082S.<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">Carburization, nitriding and low-oxygen atmospheres<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>This is silicon&#8217;s second benefit, but it should not be overstated.<\/b> The SiO\u2082 sub-layer slows carbon ingress somewhat, so 314 is <b>slightly better than 310<\/b> in carburizing environments. How much better? <b>[CONFLICT]<\/b> Two different statements circulate in the same European source family: one gives 1.4841 <b>&#8220;fair resistance to carburizing and low-oxygen gases above 900 \u00b0C&#8221;<\/b>, the other <b>&#8220;poor resistance to carburizing gases above 900 \u00b0C&#8221;<\/b>. <b>The honest way to reconcile them:<\/b> 314 is usable in mild carburization and <b>is not the solution to genuinely carburizing duty<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\">If carbon penetrates the protective layer it precipitates as <b>chromium carbide<\/b> and does two things at once: it <b>embrittles the material<\/b> and it <b>strips chromium from the matrix, collapsing oxidation resistance<\/b>. A carburized 314 part <b>gains weight, grows, distorts and is brittle at room temperature<\/b>. <b>For genuinely carburizing duty the answer is nickel, not silicon:<\/b> the <b>330 class (35 % Ni)<\/b> or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/incoloy-800h\/\">Incoloy 800H<\/a> is required, because carbon&#8217;s solubility and diffusivity in nickel are low. <b>In nitriding and low-oxygen atmospheres<\/b> the limit falls similarly: nitrogen forms <b>chromium nitride<\/b>, and in low oxygen <b>the protective oxide cannot renew itself<\/b> \u2014 <b>paradoxical but true: less oxygen LOWERS oxidation resistance<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">Aqueous corrosion \u2014 314 is NOT an aqueous-service material<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>There are two structural reasons and both are decisive.<\/b> <b>First, the absence of molybdenum:<\/b> in chloride environments the real protection against pitting and crevice attack is molybdenum, and 314 contains <b>none<\/b>. <b>Second, carbon:<\/b> the ASTM ceiling is <b>0.25 %<\/b>, which means every part that passes through the 550\u2013800 \u00b0C band \u2014 welding included \u2014 <b>must be assumed sensitized<\/b>; a sensitized austenitic stainless is consumed rapidly by <b>intergranular corrosion<\/b> in aqueous service. <b>It is not immune to chloride stress corrosion cracking either:<\/b> in austenitic stainless steels, immunity in practice begins <b>above 40\u201345 % nickel<\/b>, and 314&#8217;s 20 % is <b>far below that<\/b>. For scale, tests on 310S show <b>cracking within 30\u201346 h in boiling 42 % MgCl\u2082<\/b>, and <b>there is no reason to expect 314 to do better<\/b>. <b>Rule: never use 314 in aqueous, condensing or chloride-bearing service.<\/b> Those jobs go to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-316l\/\">316L<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-904l\/\">904L<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-f55\/\">super duplex<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">The condensation trap \u2014 the night the furnace is down<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>This is the most overlooked damage mechanism for 314 parts.<\/b> While the furnace runs the atmosphere is dry and 314 performs beautifully. When it <b>stops<\/b>, flue-gas water vapour <b>condenses on the cooling surfaces<\/b> and dissolves <b>sulphur oxides, chlorides and ash into an acidic film<\/b>. A sensitized 314 surface (carbon up to 0.25 %) is then <b>eaten intergranularly<\/b> beneath it. <b>The damage accumulates during downtime, not during service hours.<\/b> On long shutdowns, <b>keeping the furnace dry<\/b> markedly extends the life of 314 equipment \u2014 and no datasheet says so<\/p>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b13\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Honest Comparison \u2014 314 or Something Else<\/h4>\n<div style=\"border:1px solid #d7dfe4;background:#ffffff;margin:24px 0 18px;position:relative;overflow:hidden;\">\n<div style=\"background:#DD3333;color:#ffffff;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;padding:10px 12px;line-height:1.35;\">314 vs 310S vs 253 MA vs 330 vs 800H<\/div>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" data-dmwm=\"1\" style=\"position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%) rotate(-18deg);font-size:72px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.12em;color:#12303f;opacity:.05;white-space:nowrap;pointer-events:none;user-select:none;z-index:3;\">DEFENCE METAL<\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:15px;line-height:1.5;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>314 \u2014 when it is right<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Service in air, sulphur-free, between 1050 and 1150 \u00b0C<\/b>; <b>a static part, unwelded or with its welds in a cooler zone<\/b>; <b>NO pressure<\/b>; <b>product form bar, forging, wire or EN 10095 plate<\/b>. <b>In that narrow window 314 really is the cheapest correct answer<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-310\/\">310S \/ 310H<\/a><\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Gain:<\/b> <b>a complete specification chain<\/b> (A240, A312, A213, A249, A358, A182, A403 plus ASME SA-), <b>code acceptance to 816 \u00b0C in ASME VIII Div. 1<\/b>, <b>better weldability<\/b>, <b>less sigma tendency<\/b>, <b>higher elongation<\/b>. <b>Loss:<\/b> <b>a scaling limit 100 \u00b0C lower (\u22481050 \u00b0C)<\/b> and slightly lower room-temperature strength. <b>For almost any job below 1050 \u00b0C this is the right answer<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>253 MA class<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Gain:<\/b> it develops the silicon logic with <b>cerium and nitrogen<\/b>: the scale adheres better, <b>nitrogen stabilises the austenite so sigma formation is retarded<\/b>, and it holds <b>ASME VIII Div. 1 acceptance to 899 \u00b0C<\/b> \u2014 <b>something 314 has never had<\/b>. Creep strength above 871 \u00b0C is more than twice that of 310. <b>Usually cheaper, since it carries half the nickel.<\/b> <b>Loss:<\/b> lower chromium (21 %) and an oxidation limit of <b>\u22481093 \u00b0C<\/b> \u2014 so <b>in pure scaling resistance it falls behind 314<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>330 class (N08330)<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Gain:<\/b> 35 % nickel means it <b>forms NO sigma<\/b>, it is <b>best in class for thermal cycling and shock<\/b>, <b>markedly superior in carburization<\/b>, and clearly ahead in creep (1 % creep at 871 \u00b0C: <b>\u224814.5 vs \u22487.6 MPa<\/b>). <b>Loss:<\/b> <b>expensive<\/b> because of the nickel, and lower chromium (19 %). <b>For quench baskets, hearth rolls and carburizing fixtures this is usually the right answer<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/incoloy-800h\/\">Incoloy 800H<\/a><\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;background:#F7FAFB;\"><b>Gain:<\/b> \u224832 % nickel with controlled carbon and Al\/Ti makes it <b>the reference for code coverage and published long-term data in the creep range<\/b>, and <b>it exists in every product form<\/b>. <b>Loss:<\/b> priced close to nickel-base alloys, and its chromium is lower than 314&#8217;s (\u224821 %). <b>For pressure-bearing high-temperature work this class is considered, not 314<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;width:42%;\"><b>Decision tree<\/b><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:7px 12px;border-top:1px solid #eceff1;\"><b>Is there pressure? \u2192 314 comes off the list.<\/b> <b>Reducing sulphur-bearing gas? \u2192 DO NOT use 314.<\/b> <b>Heavy carburization? \u2192 330 or 800H.<\/b> <b>Heavy thermal cycling\/shock? \u2192 330.<\/b> <b>Welded fabrication and \u22641050 \u00b0C? \u2192 310S.<\/b> <b>Code coverage at 816\u2013899 \u00b0C? \u2192 310H or 253 MA.<\/b> <b>Static, unwelded, unpressurised, 1050\u20131150 \u00b0C? \u2192 314, and verify the supply form first.<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b14\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">Is 314 better than 310 everywhere? After all it withstands higher temperature.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>No, and that question contains the most common misconception about 314.<\/b> 314 has <b>exactly one definite advantage over 310: a scaling limit in air of \u22481150 \u00b0C against \u22481050 \u00b0C<\/b>. On almost every other count it is <b>behind<\/b>. <b>On the code side:<\/b> 310H is listed in ASME VIII Div. 1 up to <b>816 \u00b0C<\/b>; <b>no published allowable stress value was found for 314<\/b>, so 314 <b>cannot be used in an ASME stamped vessel<\/b>. <b>On the specification side:<\/b> 310S is covered by ASTM\/ASME as plate, pipe, tube, flanges and fittings; <b>in ASTM, 314 is only A276 bar, A314 billet, A473 forgings and A580 wire<\/b>. <b>Metallurgically:<\/b> silicon <b>accelerates sigma<\/b>, so <b>after service 314 is more brittle at room temperature than 310<\/b>; it also has a <b>higher hot-cracking risk and lower machinability<\/b>. <b>And in sulphur-bearing gas there is no gain at all.<\/b> <b>The correct sentence is:<\/b> &#8220;314 is better than 310 for a static, unwelded, unpressurised part running above 1050 \u00b0C; everywhere else 310 is better.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">I have been offered &#8220;ASTM A240 Gr. 314 plate&#8221;. Can that be genuine?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>Almost certainly not, and you should question the certificate.<\/b> ASTM A240 is the stainless plate\/sheet\/strip specification, and <b>S31400 is not within its scope<\/b>. An offer under that name is usually one of three things. <b>(1)<\/b> It is actually <b>EN 10095 \/ 1.4841<\/b> plate and the seller has used the ASTM name as a &#8220;translation&#8221; for a customer who knows it \u2014 <b>the best case, but the certificate is still wrong<\/b>. <b>(2)<\/b> It is actually <b>310S plate<\/b> and the &#8220;314&#8221; label has been applied by mistake or deliberately \u2014 <b>check the silicon analysis: 310S is typically 0.5\u20130.6 %, 314 should be 1.5\u20132.5 %<\/b>. <b>(3)<\/b> The document is fabricated. <b>What to do:<\/b> ask for the heat certificate (3.1 \/ 3.2) and check <b>four numbers: silicon (1.50\u20132.50 %?), chromium (\u226524.0 %?), carbon (\u22640.20 %?) and sulphur (\u22640.015 %?)<\/b>. The certificate must state clearly <b>which standard (EN 10095 or EN 10088-3) it was issued to<\/b>. <b>The correct order text for plate is &#8220;EN 10095, 1.4841 (X15CrNiSi25-21)&#8221;, not &#8220;ASTM A240 314&#8221;.<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">The 314 panel we pulled from the furnace is brittle. Why, and can we save it?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>Most likely sigma phase precipitated \u2014 and in 314 it happens faster than in 310.<\/b> Silicon is a <b>strong ferrite and sigma former<\/b>; it is capped at <b>\u22640.75 % in 310H<\/b> for exactly this reason, whereas in 314 it is deliberately high at <b>1.5\u20132.5 %<\/b>. If the part spent hundreds to thousands of hours in the <b>600\u2013900 \u00b0C<\/b> band (one source points specifically to <b>649\u2013816 \u00b0C<\/b> for 314), hard, brittle sigma has formed at the grain boundaries. Its most insidious trait: <b>the part is still ductile at service temperature<\/b> and runs normally; the brittleness appears <b>only once it cools to room temperature<\/b>. That is why the damage is usually discovered <b>during maintenance<\/b>, while the panel is being removed or handled. <b>Can it be saved? Yes.<\/b> A <b>solution anneal at 1100\u20131150 \u00b0C plus rapid cooling<\/b> dissolves the sigma and restores toughness. Three cautions: <b>(1)<\/b> the temperature must be high enough, because sigma is hard to dissolve; <b>(2)<\/b> cooling must be <b>rapid<\/b>, or the part passes slowly back through the damaging band and sigma returns; <b>(3)<\/b> a thin panel will distort, so <b>fixturing may be needed<\/b>. <b>The long-term fix is design:<\/b> build a temperature profile that does not park the part in the 600\u2013900 \u00b0C band, or <b>move to the 330 class, which forms no sigma<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:18px 0 6px;font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;line-height:1.5;\">My furnace atmosphere contains sulphur or carbon. Will the silicon not protect me?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>Against carbon partly; against sulphur not at all.<\/b> The two must be separated. <b>Carbon (carburization):<\/b> the <b>SiO\u2082 sub-layer<\/b> that silicon builds slows carbon ingress somewhat, so 314 is <b>slightly better than 310<\/b> in carburizing environments. By how much? The sources conflict: within the same European source family, 1.4841 is given both <b>&#8220;fair resistance above 900 \u00b0C&#8221;<\/b> and <b>&#8220;poor resistance above 900 \u00b0C&#8221;<\/b>. <b>The honest reading: it works in mild carburization and is not the solution to real carburizing duty.<\/b> The true shield against carburization is <b>nickel<\/b> \u2014 carbon&#8217;s solubility and diffusivity in nickel are low \u2014 so heavy duty calls for the <b>330 class (35 % Ni)<\/b> or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/incoloy-800h\/\">Incoloy 800H<\/a>. <b>Sulphur:<\/b> here silicon contributes <b>nothing<\/b>. European datasheets state plainly, for 1.4841, <b>&#8220;low resistance to oxidizing and reducing sulphur-bearing gases up to 650 \u00b0C&#8221;<\/b>. The reason: in reducing sulphur no protective oxide can form, sulphur reaches the metal and forms a <b>nickel sulphide eutectic that melts at \u2248645 \u00b0C<\/b>; a liquid phase appears at the grain boundaries and the part disintegrates from within. <b>Here 20 % nickel is not an advantage but a direct liability.<\/b> <b>In a reducing atmosphere containing H\u2082S, take 314 off the list.<\/b><\/p>\n<h4 id=\"dm-b15\" style=\"font-size:19px;font-weight:700;color:#12303f;margin:30px 0 10px;line-height:1.35;\">Common Datasheet Errors and Traps<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.75;\"><b>1. The equation &#8220;314 = 1.4841&#8221;.<\/b> <b>They differ at four points:<\/b> the chromium floor (<b>23.0 vs 24.0 %<\/b>), the silicon ceiling (<b>3.00 vs 2.50 %<\/b>), the carbon ceiling (<b>0.25 vs 0.20 %<\/b>) and the sulphur ceiling (<b>0.030 vs 0.015 %<\/b>). <b>EN also sets a nitrogen limit (\u22640.11 %); ASTM does not.<\/b><br \/><b>2. Labelling 1.4841 as &#8220;AISI 310&#8221; or &#8220;S31000&#8221;.<\/b> Some datasheets go so far as to head their page <b>&#8220;1.4841 = AISI 314 = UNS S31000\/S31400&#8221;<\/b>. <b>S31000 is silicon-free 310; S31400 is silicon-bearing 314.<\/b> <b>Their scaling limits differ by 100 \u00b0C.<\/b><br \/><b>3. Misspelling the EN name.<\/b> The correct form is <b>X15CrNiSi25-21<\/b>; the spelling <b>&#8220;X15CrNiSi25-20&#8221;<\/b> also circulates and is <b>wrong<\/b>. <b>Order by W.Nr.<\/b><br \/><b>4. Giving the silicon band as a single range.<\/b> <b>ASTM 1.50\u20133.00 %<\/b>, <b>EN 10095 practice 1.50\u20132.50 %<\/b>, and one catalogue, citing EN 10088-3, <b>1.50\u20132.00 %<\/b>. <b>Three different upper limits<\/b> \u2014 for the element that <b>carries this alloy&#8217;s entire identity<\/b>.<br \/><b>5. Selling &#8220;ASTM A240 Gr. 314 plate&#8221;.<\/b> <b>S31400 is NOT within A240.<\/b> For plate the correct address is <b>EN 10095 \/ 1.4841<\/b>. <b>This is the most common commercial error on the list.<\/b><br \/><b>6. Assuming 314 is an ASME code material.<\/b> <b>No ASME SA- specification and no published allowable stress value was found for S31400.<\/b> <b>314 cannot be used in ASME stamped pressure equipment.<\/b><br \/><b>7. Mistaking typical mechanical values for minima.<\/b> The circulating <b>Rm \u2248689 MPa \/ Rp0.2 \u2248345 MPa \/ A \u224840 %<\/b> are <b>TYPICAL<\/b>; the EN minima are <b>Rp0.2 \u2265230 MPa, Rm 550\u2013750 MPa, A5 \u226530 %<\/b>. <b>A 50 % gap in yield.<\/b><br \/><b>8. Never mentioning the sigma tendency.<\/b> <b>Silicon accelerates sigma<\/b>, which is <b>exactly why 310H caps it at \u22640.75 %<\/b>. <b>314 is by design more sigma-prone than 310<\/b>; published bands are <b>649\u2013816 \u00b0C<\/b> and <b>600\u2013900 \u00b0C<\/b>. <b>Expect room-temperature brittleness after service.<\/b><br \/><b>9. Treating 1150 \u00b0C as a design temperature.<\/b> That number is a <b>SCALING limit<\/b>. At that temperature the material <b>carries essentially no load<\/b>; for scale, the typical tensile strength of 310S at 1093 \u00b0C is <b>\u224844 MPa<\/b> with <b>121 %<\/b> elongation. <b>The part flows and sags.<\/b><br \/><b>10. Never distinguishing continuous from intermittent.<\/b> The 314 sources give one scaling limit and <b>never state that heavy thermal cycling spalls the layer and shortens life<\/b>. <b>Do not use 1150 \u00b0C as a design figure in cyclic service.<\/b><br \/><b>11. Implying that &#8220;silicon also protects against sulphur&#8221;.<\/b> <b>False.<\/b> European datasheets give 1.4841 <b>&#8220;low resistance to sulphur-bearing gases up to 650 \u00b0C&#8221;<\/b>; the problem is not the chromium but the <b>20 % nickel<\/b> (a <b>nickel\u2013sulphide eutectic melting at \u2248645 \u00b0C<\/b>).<br \/><b>12. Overstating carburization resistance.<\/b> [CONFLICT] <b>&#8220;fair resistance above 900 \u00b0C&#8221;<\/b> and <b>&#8220;poor resistance above 900 \u00b0C&#8221;<\/b> circulate together within the same source family. <b>The real shield against carburization is nickel, not silicon.<\/b><br \/><b>13. Quoting an &#8220;ER314 welding wire&#8221;.<\/b> <b>No such class exists in AWS A5.9.<\/b> In practice <b>ER310<\/b> or <b>1.4842<\/b> is used, and <b>because the seam carries less silicon than the base metal it is the weak link in scale resistance<\/b>.<br \/><b>14. Recommending post-weld stress relief.<\/b> <b>A slow cycle at 550\u2013900 \u00b0C is exactly inside the sigma and sensitization band<\/b>, and because of the silicon its effect is faster than in 310. <b>The only correct treatment: a full solution anneal plus rapid cooling.<\/b><br \/><b>15. Omitting that carbon may run as high as 0.25 %.<\/b> That is <b>very high<\/b> among austenitic stainless steels and makes <b>intergranular corrosion in the as-welded condition nearly certain<\/b>. <b>Do not use 314 on parts that will be wetted or see condensation.<\/b><br \/><b>16. Quoting creep data with confidence.<\/b> The European compilation available here publishes <b>the SAME 10,000 h rupture values for 1.4841 and 1.4845<\/b> (157\/63\/25 MPa at 600\/700\/800 \u00b0C) \u2014 <b>which is suspicious and could not be independently verified<\/b>. <b>For critical calculations go directly to the EN 10095 tables.<\/b><br \/><b>17. Assuming the physical properties match 310.<\/b> Electrical resistivity is <b>0.90 for 1.4841<\/b> against <b>0.85 \u03a9\u00b7mm\u00b2\/m for 1.4845<\/b> \u2014 <b>silicon raises resistivity<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/dm-zengin --><\/p>\n<div class=\"dm-benzer\" style=\"margin:22px 0 0;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #e0e0e0;background:#FBFCFD;\">\n<p style=\"font-size:11px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.08em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#9aa3a8;margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.4;\">Related grades<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;font-size:15px;line-height:2;color:#333;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-316\/\" style=\"color:#24BEE5;font-weight:600;text-decoration:none;\">AISI 316<\/a> &nbsp;\u00b7&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-316l\/\" style=\"color:#24BEE5;font-weight:600;text-decoration:none;\">AISI 316L<\/a> &nbsp;\u00b7&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-316ti\/\" style=\"color:#24BEE5;font-weight:600;text-decoration:none;\">AISI 316Ti<\/a> &nbsp;\u00b7&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-321\/\" style=\"color:#24BEE5;font-weight:600;text-decoration:none;\">AISI 321<\/a> &nbsp;\u00b7&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/austenitic-steels\/\" style=\"color:#666;font-weight:600;text-decoration:none;\">Austenitic steels \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- dm-ld --><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"name\":\"AISI 314\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"description\":\"AISI 314 (UNS S31400, W.Nr. 1.4841, EN name X15CrNiSi25-21, BS 314S25, JIS SUH310) is the highest-temperature member of the austenitic heat-resisting family.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"name\":\"Defence Metal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/\"},\"publisher\":{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"Defence Metal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/\"},\"mainEntity\":{\"@type\":\"DefinedTerm\",\"name\":\"AISI 314\",\"description\":\"AISI 314 (UNS S31400, W.Nr. 1.4841, EN name X15CrNiSi25-21, BS 314S25, JIS SUH310) is the highest-temperature member of the austenitic heat-resisting family.\",\"inDefinedTermSet\":{\"@type\":\"DefinedTermSet\",\"name\":\"Defence Metal - metals and alloys\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/\"},\"alternateName\":[\"UNS S31400\",\"W.Nr. 1.4841\",\"X15CrNiSi25-21\"],\"identifier\":[{\"@type\":\"PropertyValue\",\"propertyID\":\"UNS\",\"value\":\"S31400\"},{\"@type\":\"PropertyValue\",\"propertyID\":\"Werkstoffnummer\",\"value\":\"1.4841\"}],\"additionalProperty\":[{\"@type\":\"PropertyValue\",\"name\":\"DIN \/ EN designation\",\"value\":\"X15CrNiSi25-21\"}]}}<\/script><!-- \/dm-ld --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AISI 314 \/ (1.4841) \/ AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652 DEFENCE METAL AISI 314 UNS S31400 \u00b7 W.Nr. 1.4841 \u00b7 X15CrNiSi25-21 \u00b7 the ASTM A276 band: C \u2264 0.25%, Mn \u2264 2.00%, P \u2264 0.045%, S \u2264 0.030%, Si 1.50-3.00%, Cr 23.00-26.00%, Ni 19.00-22.00%. The EN 1.4841 band: C \u2264 0.20%, Si 1.50-2.50%, Mn \u2264 &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/\" class=\"more-link\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;AISI 314 \/ (1.4841)&#8221;<\/span>devam\u0131n\u0131 oku<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":3526,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_yoast_wpseo_title":"AISI 314 \/ (1.4841) \/ AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652 | Defence Metal","_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":"AISI 314 (1.4841) \u2014 AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652. High chromium-nickel heat resisting austenitic stainless steel for service up to 1100 \u00b0C.","inspiro_hide_title":false,"inspiro_hide_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"dm_sektor":[10,13,18,14],"class_list":["post-3655","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>AISI 314 \/ (1.4841) \/ AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652 | Defence Metal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"AISI 314 (1.4841) \u2014 AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652. High chromium-nickel heat resisting austenitic stainless steel for service up to 1100 \u00b0C.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AISI 314 \/ (1.4841) \/ AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652 | Defence Metal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"AISI 314 (1.4841) \u2014 AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652. High chromium-nickel heat resisting austenitic stainless steel for service up to 1100 \u00b0C.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defence Metal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-25T18:15:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"54 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/index.php\\\/en\\\/aisi-314\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/index.php\\\/en\\\/aisi-314\\\/\",\"name\":\"AISI 314 \\\/ (1.4841) \\\/ AMS 5522 \\\/ AMS 5652 | Defence Metal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-16T08:14:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-25T18:15:27+00:00\",\"description\":\"AISI 314 (1.4841) \u2014 AMS 5522 \\\/ AMS 5652. High chromium-nickel heat resisting austenitic stainless steel for service up to 1100 \u00b0C.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/index.php\\\/en\\\/aisi-314\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/index.php\\\/en\\\/aisi-314\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/index.php\\\/en\\\/aisi-314\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Anasayfa\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/index.php\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"AISI 314 \\\/ (1.4841)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Defence Metal\",\"description\":\"for better produce !\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Defence Metal\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/cropped-logopngson.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/cropped-logopngson.png\",\"width\":3846,\"height\":649,\"caption\":\"Defence Metal\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.defencemetal.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/defencemetal\"],\"description\":\"Havac\u0131l\u0131k, savunma, enerji ve makine sekt\u00f6rleri i\u00e7in paslanmaz \u00e7elik, nikel ala\u015f\u0131mlar\u0131, titanyum, al\u00fcminyum ve ala\u015f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00e7elik tedarik eden \u00f6zel ala\u015f\u0131m tedarik\u00e7isi.\",\"email\":\"info@defencemetal.com\",\"telephone\":\"+90 216 709 74 41\",\"legalName\":\"Defence Metal\",\"address\":{\"@type\":\"PostalAddress\",\"streetAddress\":\"Cevizli Mah. Mustafa Kemal Cad. Hukuk\u00e7ular Towers A Blok No:66A \u0130\u00e7 Kap\u0131 No:111\",\"addressLocality\":\"Kartal\",\"addressRegion\":\"\u0130stanbul\",\"postalCode\":\"34865\",\"addressCountry\":\"TR\"},\"contactPoint\":{\"@type\":\"ContactPoint\",\"contactType\":\"sales\",\"telephone\":\"+90 216 709 74 41\",\"email\":\"info@defencemetal.com\",\"areaServed\":\"TR\",\"availableLanguage\":[\"Turkish\",\"English\"]}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AISI 314 \/ (1.4841) \/ AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652 | Defence Metal","description":"AISI 314 (1.4841) \u2014 AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652. High chromium-nickel heat resisting austenitic stainless steel for service up to 1100 \u00b0C.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"AISI 314 \/ (1.4841) \/ AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652 | Defence Metal","og_description":"AISI 314 (1.4841) \u2014 AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652. High chromium-nickel heat resisting austenitic stainless steel for service up to 1100 \u00b0C.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/","og_site_name":"Defence Metal","article_modified_time":"2026-09-25T18:15:27+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"54 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/","url":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/","name":"AISI 314 \/ (1.4841) \/ AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652 | Defence Metal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-09-16T08:14:31+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-25T18:15:27+00:00","description":"AISI 314 (1.4841) \u2014 AMS 5522 \/ AMS 5652. High chromium-nickel heat resisting austenitic stainless steel for service up to 1100 \u00b0C.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/aisi-314\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Anasayfa","item":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"AISI 314 \/ (1.4841)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/","name":"Defence Metal","description":"for better produce !","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/#organization","name":"Defence Metal","url":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/cropped-logopngson.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/cropped-logopngson.png","width":3846,"height":649,"caption":"Defence Metal"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/defencemetal"],"description":"Havac\u0131l\u0131k, savunma, enerji ve makine sekt\u00f6rleri i\u00e7in paslanmaz \u00e7elik, nikel ala\u015f\u0131mlar\u0131, titanyum, al\u00fcminyum ve ala\u015f\u0131ml\u0131 \u00e7elik tedarik eden \u00f6zel ala\u015f\u0131m tedarik\u00e7isi.","email":"info@defencemetal.com","telephone":"+90 216 709 74 41","legalName":"Defence Metal","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","streetAddress":"Cevizli Mah. Mustafa Kemal Cad. Hukuk\u00e7ular Towers A Blok No:66A \u0130\u00e7 Kap\u0131 No:111","addressLocality":"Kartal","addressRegion":"\u0130stanbul","postalCode":"34865","addressCountry":"TR"},"contactPoint":{"@type":"ContactPoint","contactType":"sales","telephone":"+90 216 709 74 41","email":"info@defencemetal.com","areaServed":"TR","availableLanguage":["Turkish","English"]}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3655","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3655"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3655\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6284,"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3655\/revisions\/6284"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3526"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3655"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"dm_sektor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.defencemetal.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/dm_sektor?post=3655"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}